Home⇛Aka Student Research Journal⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2024)

Prosocial behavior and academic achievement of the college of teacher education students of Occidental Mindoro State College

Camille A. Limos | Ian D. Parle | Jessica T. Tasani | Christine A. Adre | Pauline Grace M. Domingo | Mary Nicole B. Ducado | Joanne D Gorospe

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examines the relationship between prosocial behaviors and academic achievement among students at the College of Teacher Education, Occidental Mindoro State College-San Jose Campus. The primary objective was to determine whether levels of prosocial behavior correlate significantly with academic performance, and to explore potential differences based on demographic variables such as age, sex, year level, and program. A descriptive research design was employed, involving a sample of 103 students from various education programs for the academic year 2022-2023. Data were collected using the bifactor model of the 16-item new prosociality scale and academic performance records. The analysis revealed that while prosocial actions did not show a significant correlation with academic achievement (r = 0.158, p = 0.111), prosocial feelings were positively associated with academic performance (r = 0.267, p = 0.006). Significant differences were observed in prosocial behaviors based on year level and academic program, with first-year students showing lower levels of prosocial actions and feelings compared to their senior peers. Additionally, students in the Bachelor of Elementary Education program exhibited higher levels of prosocial behaviors than those in other programs. No significant differences were found based on age or sex. These findings suggest that while specific prosocial actions may not directly impact academic success, greater emotional sensitivity and empathy are beneficial. The study highlights the importance of fostering prosocial feelings and recommends targeted interventions to enhance student support, promote empathy, and address the unique needs of various student groups. Future research should consider longitudinal studies and include diverse educational contexts to validate and expand upon these findings.



References:

  1. Aytaç, K. Y., & Kartal, M. (2016). Analyzing the prosocial tendency of students studying at physical education and sports department. SHS Web of Conferences, 26, 01047. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601047
  2. Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2015). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. In Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023
  3. Cassidy, S. (2012). Exploring individual differences as determining factors in student academic achievement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 793-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.545948
  4. Eisenberg, N., & Larson, R. (2013). The relation of prosocial behavior to children's social and emotional development. In Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-01013-013
  5. Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M. J., & Liew, J. (2014). The development of prosocial moral reasoning and a prosocial orientation in young adulthood: concurrent and longitudinal correlates. Developmental psychology, 50(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032990
  6. Fensham, P. J., & Harlen, W. (2012). Changing conceptions of science education and science curriculum development. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci3030326
  7. Galán-Muros, V., Bouckaert, M., Roser, J. (2023). The representation of women in academia and higher education management positions. UNESCO-IESALC policy brief series. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386876
  8. Gerbino, M., Zuffianò, A., Eisenberg, N., Castellani, V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2018). Adolescents' prosocial behavior predicts good grades beyond intelligence and personality traits. Journal of personality, 86(2), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12309
  9. Guo, Y. (2017). The Influence of Social Support on the Prosocial Behavior of College Students: The Mediating Effect based on Interpersonal Trust. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 158. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p158
  10. Gupta D. (2015). A Study of Prosocial Behaviour and Self Concept of Adolescents. Journal on Educational Psychology, 9(1), 38-45. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098159
  11. Johnson, M. L., Taasoobshirazi, G., Clark, L., Howell, L., & Breen, M. (2016). Motivations of traditional and nontraditional college students: from self-determination and attributions, to expectancy and values. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1132880
  12. Kanacri, B. P. L., Eisenberg, N., Tramontano, C., Zuffiano, A., Caprara, M. G., Regner, E., Zhu, L., Pastorelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2021). Measuring prosocial behaviors: Psychometric properties and cross-national validation of the prosociality scale in five countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693174 61
  13. Kruglanski, A. W. (2012). Handbook of the History of Social Psychology. In Psychology Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203808498
  14. Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., Rivera-Torres, P., & Liesa-Orús, M. (2022). Emotional well-being and social reinforcement as predictors of motivation and academic expectations. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102043
  15. Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: an integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049
  16. Longobardi, C., Settanni, M., Lin, S., & Fabris, M. A. (2021). Student-teacher relationship quality and prosocial behaviour: The mediating role of academic achievement and a positive attitude towards school. The British journal of educational psychology, 91(2), 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12378
  17. Lu, T. C., Wang, C. X., Tao, B. L., Sui, H. R., & Yan, J. (2022). The relationship between physical activity and prosocial behavior of college students: A mediating role of self-perception. PloS one, 17(8), e0271759. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271759
  18. Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047
  19. Oberle, E., & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2013). Relations among peer acceptance, inhibitory control, and math achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.09.003
  20. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., & Nielson, M. G. (2015). Does helping keep teens protected? Longitudinal bidirectional relations between prosocial behavior and problem behavior. Child development, 86(6), 1759-1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12411
  21. Senter, M. S. (2023). The Impact of social relationships on college student learning during the pandemic: implications for sociologists. Teaching Sociology, 52(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x231178505
  22. Sotnik, G., Choporov, S., & Shannon, T. (2023). The role of social identity in a population's adoption of prosocial Common-Pool behavior. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.5132
  23. Wentzel, K. R. (2012). School adjustment. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207010

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic