Home⇛Madayaw Journal⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2019)

USAGE OF MOBILE PHONES AND INTERNET SOCIAL MEANING AND FAMILY CONVERSATION

Noel E. Margate

 

Abstract:

The study was meant to describe the social meaning of the mobile phone and the Internet as perceived by the selected college students of San Pedro College. A qualitative-phenomenological research design was used to describe how the said technologies were used and how the face-to-face conversation and the virtual connection in the family were carried through. The research data were gathered through a series of focus group discussions (FGDs). The social meaning of the mobile phone and the Internet was found to be influenced by the type of technology attachments the college students were formed. The FGD participants who showed functional type of attachment merely considered the aforementioned technologies as utility devices that were instrumental in attaining social and academic responsibilities. On the other hand, those that exhibited structural type of attachment viewed the mobile phone and Internet as basic needs and as source of emotional comfort. While both technologies were helpful in expanding the face-to-face conversation to the virtual connection with the families, the mobile phone was found to be more accessible and widely used means to obtain personal updates in life, share information of all sorts and indirectly express emotions with ease. The study concludes that based on the flow of the family conversation, family values and moral purpose were imparted as part of the formation and foundation of their individual self. However, the banality and the eventual shift of technology attachment from functional to structural purposes seemingly influenced the virtual connection with family members. Thus, the flow of the family conversation where family values and moral purpose are imparted is apparently affected.



References:

  1. Bruun, H. & Hukkinen, J. (2003). Crossing boundaries: An integrative framework for studying technological change. Social Studies of Science, SAGE Publications, 33(1), 95-116. Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://sss.sagepub.com
  2. Chen, Y.F. & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67, 179-191. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhcs
  3. Corey, G. (2005). Case approach to counseling and psychotherapy. Overview of the therapeutic perspectives (6 th ed.). Brooks/Cole, Thomson Learning, 7-8.
  4. Gergen, K. J. (2000). The self in the age of information. The Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 201.
  5. Gergen, K. J. (2001). Technology, self and moral project. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://swarthmore.edu/documents-/faculty/gergen/Technology_-Self_and_the_Moral_Project.pdf
  6. Gergen, K. J. (2008). Social construction: Revolution in the making. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://www.swarthmore.edu/Documents/faculty/gergen/25230_01_Gergen_(2e)_Ch_01.pdf
  7. Gergen, K. J. (2002a). Cell phone technology and the challenge of absent presence. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://www.swarthmore.edu/Documents/faculty/gergen/Cell_Phone_Technology.pdf
  8. Gergen, K. J. (2002b). Self and community in the new floating worlds. Mobile democracy, essays on society, self and politics. Vienna: Passagen. 103-114.
  9. Green, N. (2001). Who’s watching whom? Monitoring and accountability in mobile relations. In: Brown, B., Green, N., Harper, R. (eds.). Wireless world: Social and Interacial aspects of the mobile age.
  10. Spinger, London, UK, 32-45. In: Chen, Y. F. & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67, 179-191. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhcs
  11. Horrigan, J., Rainie, L., & Fox, S. (2001). ‘Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties.’ Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved October 19,2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/report_display.asp?r=47
  12. Igarashi, T., Takai, J., & Yoshida, T. (2005). Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 691-713.
  13. Igarashi, T. Motoyoshi, T., Takai, J., & Yoshida, T. (2008). No mobile, no life: Self-perception and text message dependency among Japanese high school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2311-2324. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh
  14. Katz, J. E. & Aakhus, M. (2002). Introduction: Framing the issues. In: Katz, J. E. & Aakhus, M. (eds.). Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1-14. In: Chen, Y. F. & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67, 179-191. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhcs
  15. Katz, J. E. & Aakhus, M. A. (2002). Conclusion: Making meaning of mobiles—a theory of Apparatgeist. In Katz, J. E. & Aakhus, M. A. (eds.). Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 301-319. In: Peters, O. & Allouch, S. B. (2005). Always connected: A longitudinal field study of mobile communication. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 239-256. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/tele
  16. Kennedy, T. L. M., Smith, A., Wells, A. T. & Wellman, B. (2008). Network families: Parents and spouses are using the Internet and cell phones to create a “new connectedness.” Pew Internet and American Life Project.
  17. Kioskea.net (2009). Games trump deals for Philippines web users: Survey. Retrieved from en.kioskea.net/news/12364-games-trump-deals-for-philippines-web-users-survey
  18. Kopomaa, T. (2000). The city in your pocket: Birth of the mobile information society. In: Chen, Y. F. & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67, 179-191. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhcs
  19. Kraut, R., Patterson, M. Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). ‘Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?’ American Psychologist, 53, 1017-31. In: Cavanaugh, A. (2009). From culture to connection: Internet community studies. Sociology Compass, 3/1, 1-15. Retrieved October 19, 2009, Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
  20. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Morgan Kaufmann publishers, San Francisco, CA. In: Chen, Y. F. & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67, 179-191. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhcs
  21. McQuail, D. (2001)With more hindsight: conceptual problems and some ways forward for media use research. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 26(4), 337-350. In: Peters, O. & Allouch, S. B. (2005). Always connected: A longitudinal field study of mobile communication. Telematics and Information, 22, 239-256. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from, www.elsevier.com/locate/tele
  22. Mesch, G. S. (2009). Social context and communication channels choice among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 244-251. Retrieved August 15, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh
  23. Nie, N. H. & Erbing, L. (2002). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. IT & Society, 1, 275-283. In: Cavanaugh, A. (2009). From Culture to Connection: Internet Community. Sociology Compass, 3/1, 1-15. Retrieved October 19, 2009, Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  24. Persson, A. (2001). Intimacy among strangers: On mobile telephone calls in public places. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2(3). Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://www.mundanebehavior.org/issues/v2n3/persson.htm.
  25. Peters, O. & Allouch, S. B. (2005). Always connected: A longitudinal field study of mobile communication. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 239-256. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/tele
  26. Piazza, J. & Bering, J. M. (2009). Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to Internet behavior. Computers in Human Behavior. Retrieved August 15, 2009, from www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh
  27. Sawhney, H. & Gomez, H. (2000). Communication patterns in domestic life: Preliminary ethnographic study. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://web.media.mit.edu/_nitin/ethno/DomesticEthno.pdfS.
  28. Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. In: Cavanaugh, A. (2009). From Culture to Connection: Internet Community Studies. Sociology Compass, 3/1, 1-15. Retrieved October 19, 2009, Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic