Home⇛Universal Journal of Educational Research⇛vol. 2 no. 1 (2023)

“PARTICIPATION” IN ONLINE DISCUSSION FORUM IN DISTANCE EDUCATION: AN AUTOETHNOGRAPHIC INQUIRY

Job Vincent M. Arcebuche | Mark Nickhole R. Bernardino

 

Abstract:

Interactions are important in establishing deep and meaningful learning experiences for learners in a distance education setup. Of all the activities in an online classroom, the discussion forum proved to be the one that had the most interactions. A discussion forum lets learners interact with the content, peers, and teachers. Participation in these learning activities is one important factor. The more the learners participate, the more they learn. This paper uses the researcher’s experience in determining what participation is in an online learning experience. After reviewing the experience, participation in a discussion forum is defined as a self-induced connection to the learning community to receive and share knowledge to bring a deeper understanding of a certain theory or phenomenon.” There are conditions for a behavior or action that can be considered participation. The more conditions the behavior met, the higher the level of participation it led. The conditions are the learner analyzes an abstract theory or concept and relates it to practice or experience; the learner views other people’s perspectives regarding the subject and synthesizes a stronger and deeper understanding of the acquired knowledge; the learner communicates the acquired understanding of a certain subject that induces a validation or further inquiry; lastly, the learner constructed a train of premeditated discourse that leads to the understanding of a certain subject.



References:

  1. Altman, W. S., Ericksen, K., & Pena-Shaff, J. B. (2006). An inclusive process for departmental textbook selection. Teaching of Psychology, 33(4), 228-231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3304_2
  2. Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student Interactions in Online Discussion Forum: Empirical Research from ‘Media Richness Theory’ Perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/9.1.1.pdf
  3. Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2011, March 18). (PDF) Facilitating learning through online discussion forum: An inquiry using SEM. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228280020_Facilitating_Learning_through_Online_Discussion_Forum_An_Inquiry_Using_SEM
  4. Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘‘invisible’’ online student. CiteSeerX. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.505.5696&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  5. Brook, C., & Oliver, R. (2003). Online learning communities: Investigating a design framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1708
  6. Bullen, M., & Beuchot, A. (2005, May). Interaction and Interpersonality in online discussion forums. Learning & Technology Library (LearnTechLib). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/98459/
  7. Cho, M. H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123-140.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. Deakin University (n.d.). Effective Online Discussions. Retrieved from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/virtuallearningdesigndelivery/chapter/6-effective-online-discussions/
  9. De Lima, D.P.R., et al. (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: the instructor’s perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(1), 22.
  10. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28.
  11. Dorman, J. P., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Psychosocial environment and affective outcomes in technology-rich classrooms: Testing a causal model. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9069-8
  12. Eisenbach, B.B. (2015). Stories of Care in the Virtual Classroom: An Autoethnographic Narrative Inquiry. University of South Florida
  13. Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
  14. Gottardo, E., & Noronha, R. V. (2012, October). Social networks applied to distance education courses: analysis of interaction in discussion forums. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian symposium on Multimedia and the web, pp. 355-358.
  15. Hijada Jr., M. V. & Dela Cruz, M. L. (2022). The Gap Between Comprehension Level and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(1). Retrieved from http://ejournals.ph/form/cite.php?id=18177
  16. Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755-1765.
  17. Hrastinski, S. (2009). A Theory of Online Larning as Online Participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.
  18. James, N., & Busher, H. (2012). Epistemological dimensions in qualitative research: The construction of knowledge online. SAGE Library of Research Methods: SAGE internet research methods, 151-165.
  19. Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (2000). A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317-338.
  20. Kadagidze, L. (2014). The Role of Forums in Online Instruction. European Scientific Journal.
  21. Kaminski, J. (2007). Online Discussion Forum in Distance Learning. Retrieved from https://www.nursing-informatics.com
  22. Lieberman, M. (2019a). Discussion Boards: Valuable? Overused? Discuss. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2019/03/27/new-approaches-discussion-boards-aim-dynamic-online-learning
  23. Lieberman, M. (2019b). New approaches to discussion boards aim for dynamic online experiences. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2019/03/27/new-approaches-discussion-boards-aim-dynamic-online-learning
  24. Lima, D.P.R., et al. (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: The instructor’s perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(1), 22.
  25. Lopez, C. S. (2022). English in the Workplace: Business English as a Lingua Franca in Boardwalk Direct Selling Company. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 232-244. Available at https://www.ujer.org/vol1no4/article714
  26. Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to Jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
  27. Mohanan, K.P. (n.d.). Critical Inquiry and Inquiry-Oriented Education. Retrieved from https://mgiep.unesco.org/article/critical-inquiry-and-inquiry-oriented-education
  28. Mulenga, D., & Liang, J. S. (2008). Motivations for older adults’ participation in distance education: A study at the National Open University of Taiwan. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(3), 289-314.
  29. Motorization of coetaneous virtual learning environment. (n.d.). Academia.edu - Share research. https://www.academia.edu/33703780/Motorization_of_Coetaneous_Virtual_Learning_Environment
  30. Nunez, J. L., & Gula, L. P. (2022). Becoming A Doctor: A Collaborative Autoethnography. Partners Universal International Research Journal, 1(3), 26-33. Available at https://puirj.com/index.php/research/article/view/42
  31. Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Erratum to: Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions [Comput. Educ. 42 (3) 243–265]. Computers & Education, 43(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.02.002
  32. Picciano, A.G. (2017). Theories and Frameworks for Online Education: Seeking an Integrated Model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190.
  33. Spiro, R. J. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 441.
  34. Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.03800.x
  35. Wall, S (2008). Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, (7)1.
  36. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic