HomeInternational Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Managementvol. 2 no. 4 (2022)

The use of active learning technique Think-Pair-Share in urban land use class: Fifth year surveying engineering

Mamo Morka Jano

 

Abstract:

Active Learning techniques, designed to make the students active and collaborative participants in the learning process, are gaining popularity as a supplement and alternative to traditional lectures. The purpose of this paper is to assess and evaluate the use of TPS as an active learning technique in the urban land use planning class of the surveying engineering department. Quantitative research was deployed. The class has a 50-sample size. The results of students’ average result of the pretest (without TPS) and posttest using the Think Pair Share (TPS) method has increased from 8.975(44.98%) to 11.43(58.23%) out of 20(100%). The normalized gain for each student is 0.24(i.e. low and better than the pretest), but the value denotes a positive gain in the performance of the student’s result. The witnessed level of satisfaction of students with this teaching intervention showed that the students have positively perceived that the use of the lecture method is not enough to learn urban land use planning courses effectively. On the other hand, the result of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient data analysis of the witnessed level of satisfaction of students with TPS teaching intervention for the ten items is 0.797, suggesting that the items have relatively high internal consistency. So the majority of the respondents' students perceived the use of TPS as active learning is more essential than the traditional lecture.



References:

  1. Alpusari, M. & Putra, R.A. (2013). The Application of Cooperative Learning Think Pair Share (TPS) Model to Increase the Process Science Skills in Class IV Elementary School Number 81 Pekanbaru City. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2805-2808.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2010). Research methods. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. P.27
  3. Bamiro, A,O. (2015). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students‟ achievement in chemistry. SAGE Publishing, 1-7.
  4. Banerjee, G., Patwardhan, M., & Mavinkurve, M. (2013). Teaching with visualizations in classroom setting: Mapping Instructional Strategies to Instructional Objectives. In 2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013) (pp. 176-183). IEEE
  5. Bataineh, M,Z. (2015). Think-Pair-Share, Co Op-Co Op and Traditional Learning Strategies on Undergraduate Academic Performance. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, 5(1), 217-226
  6. Bean, J.C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing critical thinking and active-learning in the classroom (2nd ed). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA:
  7. Bewoor, A.K. (2019). Use of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) As an Active Learning Strategy to Teach Metrology Course.
  8. Bewoora, A.K. & Kulkarnib, V.A. (2018). Use of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) As an Active Learning Strategy to Teach Quality Control. In National Symposium on Innovations in Teaching-Learning Process, December, 8.
  9. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. Washington, DC, US: National Acaderesearcher Press.
  10. Deshpande, A. & Salman, B. (2016). Think-pair-share: application of an active learning technique in engineering and construction management classes. In Associate Schools of Construction, 52nd Annual Conference Proceedings, New York, NY (pp. 1-7).
  11. Dol, S.M. (2014). TPS (Think-Pair-Share): An Active Learning Strategy to Teach Theory of Computation Course. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(4), 62-67.
  12. Hénard, F. & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering Quality Teaching in Higher Education: Policies and Practices; Institutional Management in Higher Education; Guide for Higher Education Institutions.
  13. Faust, J.L. & Paulson, D.R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on excellence in college teaching, 9(2), 3-24.
  14. Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2014) ‘Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics’, Proceedings of the National Acaderesearcher of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415.
  15. Ifamuyiwa, A.S. & Onakoya, S.K. (2013). Impact of think-pair-share instructional strategy on students‟ achievement in secondary school mathematics. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (JSTAN), 48(1), 26-34. 10.
  16. Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students' critical thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3-24.
  17. Kothiyal, A., Majumdar, M., Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on international computing education research. Effect of Think-Pair-Share in a Large CS1 Class: 83% Sustained Engagement. San Diego: ACM
  18. Kresta, S.M. (1998). “Hands-on demonstrations: An alternative to full-scale lab experiments.” Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1), 7–9.
  19. Lee, C., Li, H., & Shahrill, M. (2018). Utilizing the think-pair-share technique in the learning of probability. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 49-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.8218
  20. Mahmoud, K. (2013). Think-Pair-Share: A Teaching Learning Strategy to Enhance Students‟ Critical Thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4).
  21. Martha, M.I., Emmanue, l. & Seraphina, M. (2015). Effect of think- pair –share strategy on secondary school mathematics students‟ achievement and academic self-esteem in fractions. American International Journal of Contemporary Scientific Research (AIJCSR), 2(2), 141-147.
  22. Maskel, D. (1999). “Student-based assessment in a multidisciplinary problem-based learning environment.” Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 237-241.
  23. Morka, A. (2019). Assessing the Effects of Higher Diploma Program (HDP) Training on the Teaching Learning Process in Assossa University.
  24. Nirmalakhandan, N., Ricketts, C., McShannon, J., & Barrett, S. (2007).” Teaching Tools to Promote Active Learning: Case Study.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(1), 31-37. Review of the research’, Quart. Rev. Distance Educ., 3(2), 161-179
  25. Parahoo, A.K. (1997). Nursing Research, Principles, Process, and Issues. London, MacMillan. Pp.142.
  26. Polit, D.F. et al. (2001). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilisation. Philadephia, Lippincott.pp. 167.
  27. Raba, A.A.A. (2017). The Influence of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) on Improving Students‟ Oral Communication Skills in EFL Classrooms. Scientific Research Publishing, 8, 12-23.
  28. Saunders, B.R., Laajam, N., Daly, E., Teow, S., Hu, X., & Stepto, R. (2009). Microgels: From responsive polymer colloids to biomaterials. Advances in colloid and interface science, 147, 251-262, pp.136.
  29. Sharma, H.L. & Saarsar, P. (2018). TPS (think-pair–share): An effective cooperative learning strategy for unleashing discussion in classroom interaction. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 8(5), 91-100.
  30. Siburian, T.A. (2013). Improving students‟ achievement on writing descriptive text through think-pair-share. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 3(3), 30-43.
  31. Sugiarto, D. & Sumarsono, P. (2014). The Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Model to Improve Students‟ Ability in Reading Narrative Texts. International Journal of English and Education, 3(3), 206-215.
  32. Tint, S.S. & Nyuut. E.E. (2015). Collaborative learning with Think-pair-share Technique. Computer Applications: An International Journal (CAIJ), 2(1), 1-11.
  33. Titsankaew, P. (2015). The Effects of using Cooperative Learning on Student’s Achievement and Attitude toward Mathematics. The international conference on language, education, humanities & Innovation, 83-87.
  34. Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 60, 53-85.