Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 3 (2023)

Study Habit and Social Media Exposure as Predictors of Grade 10 Students Academic Performance

Glenn M. Castillas

 

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine the respondents' study habits and social media exposure during the school year. 2019- 2020.The study's participants were 50 grade 10 students of Alabel 4 District. The researcher administered the survey to all of the student respondents. Majority of respondents were 17 years old, and the majority of their parents had a bachelor's degree and were all employed. The researcher administered the survey to all of the student respondents. The majority of respondents were 17 years old, and the majority of their parents had a bachelor's degree and were all employed. It also has a high correlation with respondents' social media exposure. The responses revealed that respondents' use of social media has a direct or indirect positive effect on their academic performance. The study suggests that parents should constantly guide and supervise their children's use of social media, particularly female and younger students who are more interested in social networking. Despite the fact that this study discovered that respondents' socio-demographic characteristics have no bearing on their academic performance. It also suggests that a long-term program be implemented to assist students in constantly improving their study habits. According to the study's findings, teachers must continue to effectively stimulate and sustain students' interests and enthusiasm for learning in order for them to consistently achieve exceptional academic performance. Teachers should receive regular service trainings and workshops to stay current on their knowledge and pedagogical skills, improve the quality of the teacher workforce, and improve students' academic achievement.



References:

  1. Ahmad, K., &Naeema, B. (2013). Influence of socioeconomic and educational background of parents on their children’ education in Nigeria. International journal of scientific and research publications, volume 3
  2. Akram, Muhammad, & Ghani Mamuna, Gender And Language Learning Motivation (2013). Department Of English, Islamia University Of Bahawalpur, P Akistan.Issn-L: 2223-9553, Issn: 2223-9944 Vol. 4 No. 2 March 2013.
  3. Alhajraf, N. M., &Alasfour, A. M. (2014). The Impact of Demographic and Academic Characteristics on Academic Performance.International Business Research, 7(4), p92.
  4. Aluede, E. F., &Onolemhemhen, G.F. (2001). Effect of study habit counseling on the academic performance of secondary schools students in English language. Journal of Education Research.38 (3), 17-26.
  5. Ashton, C. (2001). Life Skills Project Implementation in the American Education System. YAREVAN: UNICEF.
  6. Bansal, D., &Dhananjay Joshi, T. (2014).A Study of Students Experiences of WhatsApp Mobile Learning.Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 14(4).
  7. Baquiran, L. A. (2011). Study Habits and Attitudes of Freshmen Students: Implications for Academic Intervention Programs. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1116-1121.
  8. Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment .Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 39- 62.
  9. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J.V. (2001).Research in Education (7th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.
  10. Bouhnik, D., &Deshen, M. (2014).WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217-231.
  11. Boyd, D. M. &Elisson, N. B. (2007).Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(13), 11. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
  12. Boyd, D. (2008). Why Youth Heart Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life, 119-142.
  13. Burnett, P.C.(2002), Teacher Praise and Feedback and Students’ Perceptions of the Classroom Environment. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 1–16.
  14. Businessdictionary.com (2016).Family Income. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/familyincome.html#ixzz4BuQCS3hr
  15. Cabasog, E. L. (2016). The Influence of Study Habits, Parental Involvement and Tecahers’ Involvement on the Academic Performance of Grade 6 Muslim Pupils. Master Thesis. Holy Trinity College of General Santos City, Philippines.
  16. Cahyani, H., &Cahyono, B.Y. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes and technology use in Indonesian EFL classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 23(2), 130-148.
  17. Calvo, R., Arbiol, A., & Iglesias, A. (2014). Are all Chats suitable for learning purposes? A study of the required characteristics.Procedia Computer Science, 27, 251-260.
  18. Davis, C. H. F., Canche, M. S. G., Deil-Amen, R. & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2012).Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Research Directions. Arizona: The Center for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University.
  19. Dihaisat, F. (2016).Impact of Classroom Environment on Jordanian Secondary School Students. Unpublished MA Thesis, Islamic University.
  20. Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 224–249. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0030
  21. Duhina, L. R. (2012). “The study habits of grade IV pupils in Cahilsot I. General Santos City”. Master thesis.Holy Trinity College of General Santos City.
  22. Duke, N. (2000). For the rich it’s richer: Print environments and experiences offered to first-grade students in very low- and very high-SES school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 456–457.
  23. Eamon, M. K. (2005). Social demographic, school, neighborhood and parenting influences on academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 163-175.
  24. Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do gender and race matter? Explaining the relationship between sports participation and achievement.Sociological Spectrum, 25(2), 177-195.
  25. Fehintola, J. O. (2014). Teachers’ Characteristics as Correlates of Students’ Academic Performance among Secondary School Students in Saki-west Local Government Area of Oyo State. Journal of Educational and Social Research 4 (6): 459-468
  26. Feuerstein, A. (2000). School characteristics and parent involvement: Influences on participation in schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 29.
  27. Furstenberg, F. F., & Hughes, M. E.(1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580-592.
  28. Fitriah, A., Sumintono, B., Subekti, N. B., & Hassan, Z. (2013). A different result of community of participation in education: An Indonesian case study of parental participation in public primary schools. Asia Pacific Education Revision, 14, 483–493.
  29. Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research, International Journal of Education Research, 11, 145-252.
  30. Garcia-Mainar, I., Molina, J. A., &Montuenga, V. M. (2011).Gender differences in childcare: Time allocation in five European Countries. Feminist Economics, 17 (1), 119-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2010.542004
  31. Goddard, R. D. (2003). The impact of schools on teacher beliefs, influence, and student achievement: The role of collective efficacy. In J. Raths& A. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 6), pp.183–204. Westport, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  32. Goddard, R. D. (2003). Relational networks, social trust, and norms: A social capital perspective on students' chances of academic success. Educational Evaluations & Policy Analysis, 25, 59-74.
  33. Grismore, B. A. (2012). Mini technology manual for schools: An introduction to technology integration. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED533378)
  34. Gudaganavar, N. &Halayannavar, R. (2014). Influence of Study Habits on Academic Performance of Higher Primary School Students.International Journal of Science and research (IJSR), Vol. 3, No. 2
  35. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference, Melbourne, VIC.
  36. Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 161–164.
  37. Henderson, A. T. (1988). Good news: An ecologically balanced approach to academic improvement. Educational Horizons, 66(2), 60-67.
  38. Holloway, S.,Yamamoto, Y., Suzuki, S. &Mindnich, J.D. (2008). Determinants of Parental Involvement in Early Schooling: Evidence from Japan. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 10 (1),1-10.
  39. Hornby, G. (2011). Parental involvement in childhood education: Building effective school-family partnerships. Springer Science & Business Media.
  40. Hrastinski, S., Edman, A., Andersson, F., Kawnine, T., &Soames, C. A. (2014).Informal math coaching by instant messaging: Two case studies of how university students coach K-12 students. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 84-96.
  41. Hu, R. (2016). The age factor in second language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2164-2168. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.13.
  42. Ibrahim, M.U. &Abubakar N.B. (2015) The Impact of Parents’ Occupation on Academic Performance of Secondary School Students in Kuala Terengganu. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1
  43. Jamal M. (2009).Seven teacher competence fun and professional. Jogjakarta: PowerBooks.
  44. Kalmus, V. (2013). “Children’s safety in the new media environment”, in EstonianHuman Development Report 2012/2013: Estonia in the World,ed M. Heidmets, Estonian Cooperation Assembly, Tallinn, pp. 92-94. Available from: . [16 July 2015].
  45. Kassim,A.,Kehinde, M., &Abisola, L.(2011).Parents’ education, occupation and real mother’s age as predictors of students’ achievement in Mathematics in some selected secondary schools in Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of African Studies, 145(4),50-60.
  46. Khan, R.A., Iqbal, N. &SaimaTasneem, S. (2015). The influence of Parents Educational level on Secondary School Students Academic achievements in District Rajanpur. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6, No. 16
  47. Kilei, J. K. (2012). Factors Influencing Quality Training in Public Primary TTC in Rift Valley Zone, Kenya. Executive Med project, Moi University
  48. Kumar, V. S., Lian, T. Y., &Vasudevan, H. (2016) UNiKL RCMP Undergraduates Perception on Using WhatsApp as a Tool for Mandarin Language Teaching and Learning.
  49. Kurgat, S. J and Gordon, T. J (2014). The effects of teacher characteristics and attitudes on students’ achievement in Kcse Economics Examination. International Journal of Education Learning and Development 2(5),33-43.
  50. Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., &Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 36(11), 143-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010
  51. Laerd, (2018).Dissertation, Lund Research Ltd. Total Population Sampling.Retrieved from http://dissertation.laerd.com/total-population-sampling.php on April 18, 2018.
  52. Lampatan, T.A. (2012). “Academic performance of the intermediate Muslim pupils in Mathematics as influenced by their study habits, parent factors and teacher factors. Master Thesis. Mindanao State University of General Santos City.
  53. Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., &Ang, P. H. (2008).Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent internet use.Current Psychology, 27, 217-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9038-6
  54. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/211/report_display.asp
  55. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media, & technology overview 2015.Pew Research Center: Information and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  56. Lopez, O. S. (1995). The effect of the relationship between classroom student diversity and teacher capacity on student performance: Conclusions and recommendations for educational policy and practice. Austin, TX: The Strategic Management of the Classroom Learning Enterprise Research Series.
  57. Ma, X. & Wang, J. (2001).A confirmatory examination of Walberg’s model of educational productivity in student career aspiration.Educational Psychology, 21, 443-453.
  58. Marmot, M. (2004).The status syndrome: how social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: our Book
  59. Martí, E. (2003). Representar el mundoexternamente. La construccióninfantil de los sistemasexternos de representación. Madrid: Antonio Machado.
  60. Marzano, Robert &Marzano, Jana. (2003). The Key to Classroom Management. Educational Leadership. 61. 6-13.
  61. Morrison, D. M., Mohaski, K., & Cotter, K. (2005).Instructional quality indicators research foundations. Cambridge, MA: Connecticut.
  62. Mucella, U., Melis, S. O &Ahu, E. (2011).The effects of teachers’ attitudes on students’ personality and performance in Instanbul Turkey.Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 (2011) 738 – 742
  63. Musgrave, C.B. 2000. Environmental Factors Affecting Attitude towards Science and Mathematics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1) 382 – 394.
  64. Nabukenya, M. (2007).Influence of teachers’ professionalism on teacher performance in Busiro County Secondary Schools, Wakiso District. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Makerere University.
  65. Onyinye, O., &Okereke, N.A. (2012). The Attitude of Final Year Students Towards Learning of Physics in Ihiala Local Government Area of Anambra State. Journal of Science and Arts, 1(18), 85-92.
  66. Osharive, P. (2015). Social Media and Academic Performance of Students. Research Project submitted to Department of Educational Administration, (100302125).
  67. OECD. (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000.
  68. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume 1): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
  69. Oye, N. D., Mahamat, A. H. and Rahim, N. Z. (2012). Model of Perceived Influence of Academic Performance Using Social Networking. International Journal of Computers and Technology, 2(2), 24-29.
  70. Palekahelu, D., Hunt, J., &Thrupp, R. (2016).ICT use by schools in Kota Salatiga, Central Java. In L. Morris, & C. Tsolakidis, (Eds.), Proceedings: International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE) 2016, Rhodes, Greece.
  71. Park, C. N., & Son, J. B. (2009).Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers' perceptions and perspectives.International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.5.2.80
  72. Peng, S. S., & Hall, S. T. (1995).Understanding racial-ethnic differences in secondaryschool science and mathematics achievement (NCES No. 95710). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  73. Rafiq, H. M. W., Fatima, T., Sohail, M. M., Saleem, M., & Khan, M. A. (2013). Parental involvement and academic achievement; A study on secondary school students of Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(8).
  74. Rambe, P. (2012). Constructive disruptions for effective collaborative learning: Navigating the affordances of social media for meaningful engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning 10(1), 132-146.
  75. Rambe, P., &Bere, A. (2013a). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544-561.
  76. Rather, A.A. (2013). Overuse of Facebook and Academic grades: an Inverse Correlation. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS.)Volume 12, (6). PP 68-72.
  77. Reynolds, A. J. & Walberg, H. J., (1991).A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 97-107.
  78. Reynolds, A. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 371-382.
  79. Rowe, K. (2003). The importance of teacher quality as a key determinant of students' experiences and outcomes of schooling. Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us? Melbourne, VIC. http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/3
  80. Ryan, M. (2010).Cultural studies: a practical introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  81. Robert, M. (2007). The Contribution of Learning Mentors to Achievement: Pastoral Care in Education, Volume 25, issue 3.
  82. Ross, S.M., Morrison, G.R., &Lowther, D.L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1),17-35

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic