HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovationvol. 1 no. 1 (2023)

THE EFFICACY OF THE ONLINE EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY

Noreen Leigh B. Ramos

 

Abstract:

This study is intended to determine the efficacy of the teachers and students involving social, cognitive, and teaching presences to the Senior High School students of Saint Joseph College. This study utilized the descriptive survey design. Calderon (2006), defined descriptive research as a purposive process of gathering, analyzing, classifying, and tabulating data about prevailing conditions, practices, processes, trends, and cause-effect relationships and then making an adequate and accurate interpretation of such data with or without or sometimes minimal aid of statistical methods. The following major findings are: the status of the implementation of the online educational community is at a well implemented level as rated by the students and the teachers. There is no significant difference between the rating of the teachers and the students on the status of the implementation of the online educational community. It can be concluded that the implementation of the online educational community could not be indicative of the performance of the students. Since there is no significant relationship between the implementation of utilizing online education, online learning can still continue as a learning modality whether there is an ongoing pandemic or not because there might be other factors that affect the performance of the students. The mode of the teaching-learning process could not affect the performance of the students.



References:

  1. Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1550848
  2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R, and Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2) Retrieved from:

http://immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/ATHAB_CA/Anderson.pdf

  1. Anderson, T. (2004). Anderson, T. (2004). Teaching in an online learning context. Theory and practice of online learning, 273. https://oarklibrary.com/file/2/2b5725a4-4fe0-46b4-8c5d-1549255f4594/f24e89a9-98cc-4a3c-bb7b-1f0f9e9224bd.pdf#page=355
  2. Artino, A.R. (2007). Online Military Training: Using a Social Cognitive View of Motivation and Self-Regulation to Understand Students' Satisfaction, Perceived Learning, and Choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191-202. Retrieved November 26, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/106651/.
  3. Barrot, J. S. (2021). Scientific Mapping of Social Media in Education: A Decade of Exponential Growth. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120972010.
  4. Copeland, W. E., McGinnis, E., Bai, Y., Adams, Z., Nardone, H., Devadanam, V., Rettew, J., & Hudziak, J. J. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on College Student Mental Health and Wellness. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(1), 134–141.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.466.
  5. Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4), 287-303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137910100403.
  6. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. Retrieved November 26, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/93870/.
  7. Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716831.
  8. Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990) Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education,39(3),196–209.Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0363452900937880
  9. Liu, C.-J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Using the Community of Inquiry Model to Investigate Students’ Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.3.d.
  10. Medina, A. M., Camposagrado, A. E., & Lim, M. C. (2022). A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experiences of Tagumpay National High School Teachers Involved in Online Learning Action Cell Session. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 142-154. Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7111218.
  11. Pastor, M. J., Andres, S. R., & Manarpaac, J. R. (2022). The Big Shift: Examining Practices, Challenges and Coping Mechanisms of Teachers and Students in Transitioning to Modular Distance Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 155-163. Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7111238