Experiences and Health-Seeking Practices of Women with Cervical Cancer in Iloilo Province

Louie  P. Hijalda,; Trisha Anne  Selvaraj,; Karyn Joy  Lamis,; Venesse  Palencia,; Rogelio  Escorpiso Jr.,

Experiences and Health-Seeking Practices of Women with Cervical Cancer in Iloilo Province

Trisha Anne Selvaraj | Karyn Joy Lamis | Venesse Palencia | Rogelio Escorpiso Jr. | Louie P. Hijalda

Abstract:

Cervical Cancer affects women worldwide. This research focuses on the experiences and health seeking practices of women diagnosed with Cervical Cancer in the Province of Iloilo, in relation to a variety of aspects. This study was conducted to explore the experiences of women with Cervical Cancer in terms of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors; and discuss their health-seeking practices in terms of diet, exercise, and medical care compliance. A qualitative-descriptive approach was utilized in this study. The researchers interviewed women in Iloilo Province with Cervical Cancer, to examine their experiences and health-seeking practices. Significantly, the study was able to establish that five out of six respondents felt physical discomfort. Majority of them needed assistance in their daily activities. Four out of six respondents were upset about their present situation, and only two had positive mindsets. Majority experienced emotional support from their relationships. However, two out of the six respondents felt disinclined to socialize. All of the respondents found a more significant connection with their faith. For health seeking practices, all respondents with the exception of one were able to comply with their new diets. There were also modifications and changes in the participants’ ability to work, and sleep. The majority of them complied with their prescribed health regimens. They were able to have regular checkups, monitor their health progress, and take medication consistently. The study confirmed that the respondents shared a commonality in the modifications they adopted in terms of their biological, psychological, spiritual, and social approaches towards their experience with cancer. The similarities in these applied changes were also integrated in their health-seeking practices. It is imperative that health practitioners and researchers understand the linkage between women with Cervical Cancer and a variety of socio-physical aspects.

References:

1. American Cancer Society (2018). Physical Activity and the Cancer Patient.
https://www.cancer.org/treatmentsurvivorship- during-and-after-treatment staying-active/ physical-activity-and-the- cancer-patient.html
2. Ann Med Health Sci Res (2014).A Study on Knowledge and Screening for Cervical
Cancer among Women in Mangalore City https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199169/
3. Asia Pac J OncolNurs. (2018). A Study on Cervical Cancer Screening Using Pap Smear Test and Clinical Correlation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC5996593/ Cancer Treatment Center of America (2018). Spiritual Support for Cervical Cancer. /
4. Khalil, J., et al. (2015). Impact of cervical cancer on quality of life: beyond the short term
5. Lins, G. A. I., et al (2013). Theory of Human Becoming in Nursing Ecology: Applying Meleis’ evaluation method.Vol. 22 no. 4.
6. National Cancer Institute. (2016). Physical Activity and Cancer. National Institutes of Petiprin, Alice. (2016). Nursin/g Theory: Human Becoming Theory. Nursing-Theory Org.
7. Spiegel, D., (2016). Sleep More to Heal Cancer? Psychology Today. https:// www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201606/ sleep-more-heal-cancer
8. Tian, J., et al. (2015) .Sleep status of cervical cancer patients and predictors of poor sleep quality during adjuvant therapy. Support Care in Cancer. Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1401-1408 Vann, M. / (2017). Cervical Cancer Prevention and Your Diet. Retrieved: September 8,2018
.https://www.everydayhealth.com/cervicalcancer/prevention.aspx
9. Weil, A., (2018). Cervical Cancer.Healthy Lifestyle Brands.
https://www.drweil.com/health-wellness/body-mind-spirit/cancer/cervical-cancer/
10. American Cancer Society. 2015. Global cancer facts & figures, 3rd ed American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
11. Bloch W, Zopf E, Zimmer P, Baumann FT. 2013. Role of physical activity in tumor patients and possible underlying mechanisms. Eur Rev Aging Phys Activity 10: 25. [Google Scholar]
12. Case MA, Burwick HA, Volpp KG, Patel MS. 2015. Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearble devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA 313: 625–626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Coleman EA, Goodwin JA, Coon SK, Richards K, Enderlin C, Kennedy R, Stewart CB, McNatt P, Lockhart K, Anaissie EJ. 2011. Fatigue, sleep, pain, mood, and performance status in patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Nurs 34: 219–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Demark-Wahnefried W, Hars V, Conaway MR, Havlin K, Rimer BK, McElveen G, Winer EP. 1997. Reduced rates of metabolism and decreased physical activity in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J ClinNutr 65: 1495–1501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. 2012. Older Americans 2012: key indicators of well-being. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
16. Ferrucci L, Schrack JA, Knuth ND, Simonsick EM. 2012. Aging and the energetic cost of life. J Am GeriatrSoc 60: 1768–1769. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Gresham GK, Piantadosi S, Drye L, Figlin RA, ManoharShinde A. 2016. Applications of wearable activity monitors (WAM) in cancer clinical trials (CT): a review of the literature. [Abstract]. J ClinOncol 34. [Google Scholar]
18. Harris TJ, Owen CG, Victor CR, Adams R, Ekelund U, Cook DG. 2009. A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 1392–1402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Hurria A, Mohile SG, Dale W. 2012. Research priorities in geriatric oncology: addressing the needs of an aging population. J NatlComprCancNetw 10: 286–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. John D, Sasaki J, Staudenmayer J, Mavilia M, Freedson PS. 2013. Comparison of raw acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph GT3X+ activity monitors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 13: 14754–14763. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Lee JM, Kim Y, Welk GJ. 2014. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46: 1840–1848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Lowe SS, Watanabe SM, Courneya KS. 2009. Physical activity as a supportive care intervention in palliative cancer patients: a systematic review. J Support Oncol 7: 27–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Lyden K, Keadle SK, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. 2014. A method to estimate free-living active and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46: 386–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Martin KR, Koster A, Murphy RA, Van Domelen DR, Hung MY, Brychta RJ, Chen KY, Harris TB. 2014. Changes in daily activity patterns with age in U.S. men and women: national health and nutrition examination survey 2003-04 and 2005-06. J Am GeriatrSoc 62: 1263–1271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Matthews CE, Moore SC, George SM, Sampson J, Bowles HR. 2012. Improving self-reports of active and sedentary behaviors in large epidemiologic studies. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 40: 118–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Moore SC, Lee IM, Weiderpass E, Campbell PT, Sampson JN, Kitahara CM, Keadle SK, Arem H, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Hartge P, et al. 2016. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA Intern Med 176: 816–825. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. National Cancer Institute. 2017. Cancer statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics. Updated March 22, 2017. [Google Scholar]
28. Nissila S, Bouchard J, Boustany M. 2014. IHS
MEMS & sensors for wearables report—2014. [Google Scholar]
29. Pirl WF, Fujisawa D, Stagl J, Eusebio J, Traeger L, El-Jawahri A, Greer JA, Temel JS. 2015. Actigraphy as an objective measure of performance status in patients with advanced cancer. [Abstract]. J ClinOncol 33. [Google Scholar]
30.Rogers LQ. 2010. Objective monitoring of physical activity after a cancer diagnosis: challenges and opportunities for enhancing cancer control. PhysTher Rev 15: 224–237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Schrack JA, Simonsick EM, Chaves PHM, Ferrucci L. 2012. The role of energetic cost in the age-related slowing of gait speed. J Am GeriatrSoc 60: 1811–1816. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Schrack JA, Zipunnikov V, Goldsmith J, Bai J, Simonsick EM, Crainiceanu C, Ferrucci L. 2013. Assessing the “physical cliff”: detailed quantification of age-related differences in daily patterns of physical activity. J Gerontol A BiolSci Med Sci 69: 973–979. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Schrack JA, Zipunnikov V, Goldsmith J, Bandeen-Roche K, Crainiceanu CM, Ferrucci L. 2014. Estimating energy expenditure from heart rate in older adults: a case for calibration. PLoS One 9: e93520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Schrack J, Zipunnikov V, Crainiceanu C. 2015. Electronic devices and applications to track physical activity. JAMA 313: 2079–2080. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Schrack JA, Cooper R, Koster A, Shiroma EJ, Murabito JM, Rejeski WJ, Ferrucci L, Harris TB. 2016. Assessing daily physical activity in older adults: unraveling the complexity of monitors, measures, and methods. J Gerontol A BiolSci Med Sci 71: 1039–1048. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. 2015. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 5–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Staudenmayer J, He S, Hickey A, Sasaki J, Freedson P. 2015. Methods to estimate aspects of physical activity and sedentary behavior from high-frequency wrist accelerometer measurements. J ApplPhysiol (1985) 119: 396–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Steene-Johannessen J, Anderssen SA, Van der Ploeg HP, Hendriksen IJ, Donnelly AE, Brage S, Ekelund U. 2016. Are self-report measures able to define individuals as physically active or inactive? Med Sci Sports Exerc 48: 235–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, Brach J, Chandler J, Cawthon P, Connor EB, et al. 2011. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305: 50–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Takacs J, Pollock CL, Guenther JR, Bahar M, Napier C, Hunt MA. 2014. Validation of the fitbit one activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport 17: 496–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Washburn RA. 2000. Assessment of physical actvity in older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 71: S79–S88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Welch WA, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, Freedson PS, Staudenmayer JW, John D, Steeves JA, Conger SA, Ceaser T, Howe CA, et al. 2013. Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45: 2012–2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]