Research Hesitancy in the Academe: A Multi-University Study in the Philippines

Cherry Ann  G. Durante,; Lino  C. Reynoso,; Lorenzo  C. Lorenzo,; Norma  G. Nunez,; Rufo  Calixtro Jr.,; Estrella  San Juan,; Jeeno Jay  Frani,

Research Hesitancy in the Academe: A Multi-University Study in the Philippines

Abstract:

Cultivating a culture of research in the academe is one of the goals of every institution of higher education in the Philippines. Despite of this, there exists a hesitation among faculty and non-teaching staff in engaging in research and publication. This study explored the reasons behind the decrease of research productivity in the academe in different higher education institutions in the Philippines. Sixteen faculty members from different disciplines were included in the study and were interviewed from November to December 2022. Employing a descriptive phenomenological research design, results showed that the causes of research hesitancy were summarized into four domains, namely: individual, institutional, scientific and professional domains. Under the individual domain, the themes of lack of confidence, lack of motivation, lack of time and lack of interest were identified. The institutional domain enumerated lack of research training, equipment, lack of research programs and funding deficiency. The scientific domain contained themes like lack of knowledge, skill and expertise in conduct of research and writing publishable papers. The professional domain identified themes that revolve around lack of access, lack mentors and lack of collaboration between faculty members. Based on the results of the study, all of the participants expressed the lack of funding support, which included tedious methods of acquiring such funding from the institution and other stakeholders as the primary cause of their hesitancy. Furthermore, participants expressed that individual factors that cause research hesitancy are most difficult to overcome as it pertains to past negative experiences, which led to the reluctance to be trained or to engage in research. The lack of a research culture within the institution was also linked to the absence of a clear research agenda and program, and capacity-building programs geared towards faculty researcher development.

References:

Creswell, J. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publication.
Moustakas, C. (2019). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hu, C., & Chang, Y. (2017). John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(2), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v4i2.1313
Cocal CJ, Cocal EJ, Celino B. Factors limiting research productivity of faculty members of a state university: The Pangasinan state university Alaminos city campus case. Asia Pacific J Acad Res Social Sci 2017;2:43-8.
Okoduwa SIR, Abe JO, Samuel BI, Chris AO, Oladimeji RA, Idowu OO, et al. Attitudes, perceptions, and barriers to research and publishing among research and teaching staff in a Nigerian research institute. Front Res Metr Anal 2018;3:26.
Pakdaman N, Ahmadi MA, Pakdaman R, Malih N. Barriers to research activities of faculty members in Islamic Azad University. Soc Determinants Health 2016;2:76-83.
Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc 2012;5:53-9.
Ellis N, Loughland T. The challenges of practitioner research: A comparative study of Singapore and NSW. Australian J Teacher Education 2016;41:2-16.
Wenke RJ, Mickan S, Bisset L. A cross sectional observational study of research activity of allied health teams: Is there a link with self-reported success, motivators and barriers to undertaking research?. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:114
Nath B, Kumari R. Perceived barriers and effect of knowledge-based intervention on the competencies of medical faculty members towards conducting research. J Med Edu 2017;16:e105576.
Conradie A, Duys R, Forget P, Biccard BM. Barriers to clinical research in Africa: A quantitative and qualitative survey of clinical researchers in 27 African countries. Br J Anaesth 2018;121:813-24.
Fournier I, Stephenson K, Fakhry N, Jia H, Sampathkuma R, Lechien JR, et al. Barriers to research among residents in OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery around the world. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2019;136:S3-7.
Tullu MS, Karande S. Quality research in Indian medical colleges and teaching institutions: The need of the hour. J Postgrad Med 2016;62:213-5.