Home⇛The Rizalian Researcher⇛vol. 7 no. 1 (2020)

HOMEROOM GUIDANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND LEARNER DEVELOPMENT DOMAINS IN THE NEW NORMAL OF ALAMADA EAST DISTRICT

Ofelia Caturas | Josephine B. Baguio

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the level of Homeroom Guidance implementation as a determinant of the learner developmental domains of teachers in Alamada East District, Cotabato Division. The finding revealed that the Homeroom Guidance implementation items of curriculum implementation and compliance, delivery process, evaluation of learner’s development, and feed oftentimesmes manifested. Teachers somewhat expire at the satisfaction of the mechanism in implementing Homeroom Guidance to the learners. This is manifested in how the program was able to address the developmental needs of learners since they rated extensive to the majority of the indicators. Moreover, the learner development domains in terms of academic development, personal and social development and career development are extensive. This means that teachers were able to address the developmental needs of learners with the implementation of the Homeroom Guidance program in the instructional process. However, some of the items in the career developmental domain needed more intervention activities, as shown in the result that they were moderately extensive. The teachers believed it was because they did not experience a face-to-face encounter with learners that they were not able to develop their talents and skills. DepEd should design programs to address the career development needs of learners to prepare them for the world of work as early as elementary years. Teachers should also be sent to capacity-building seminars and training for effective implementation of the program.



References:

  1. Akos, P., Cockman, C. R., & Strickland, C.A. (2007). Differentiating classroom guidance. Professional School Counseling, 10(5), 455-463.
  2. Ahmed, A., & Firdous, H. (2020). The Transformational Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Guidance and Counseling. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education. Vol-6 Issue-6. ISSN (O)-2395, 4396.
  3. Aquino, G.V. & Razon, P.U. (1993). Educational Psychology: Rex Bookstore.1993
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
  5. Baker, S. B., & Gerler, E. R.(Eds).  Counseling in Schools. In D. C.
  6. Bloom, L. A. (2009). Classroom management: Creating positive outcomes for all students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design 4th edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  9. Kant, R. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemic: Looking in the mind of students during lockdown. Purakala. UGC CARE J, 31, 508-522.
  10. Locke, J. E. Myers, and E. L. Herr (2001).  The Handbook of Counseling, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  11. Brigman, G.A, Webb, L.D & Campbell, C. (2007). Building Skills for School Success: Improving the Academic and Social Competence of Learners.
  12. Carey, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2012).  School counseling and student outcomes: Summary of six statewide studies Professional School Counseling, 16 (2), 146-153. doi: 10.1177/2156759X0001600204.
  13. Deemer, S. A. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73-90.
  14. Early, D., Rogge, R., & Deci, E. (2014). Engagement, alignment, and rigor as vital signs of high quality instruction: A classroom visit protocol for instructional improvement and research. High School Journal, 97(4), 219-239.
  15. Gautam, C., Lowery, C., Mays, C., & Durant, D. (2016). Challenges for global learners: A qualitative study of concerns and difficulties of international students. Journal of International Students, 6(2), 501-526.
  16. George, A., Hall, G., & Stiegelbauer (2013). Measuring implementation in school: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: SEDL.
  17. Hall, G. (2015). Jere Brophy: The Texas years. Journal of Classroom Interactions, 50(2), 102- 106.
  18. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  19. Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration.  new directions for youth development • DOI: 10.1002/yd Behavior, 66(3), 385–419;
  20. Madden, L. E. (2007). Motivating students to learn better through own goal-setting. Education, 117(3), 411-415.
  21. Meeus, W. (2011). The study of adolescent identity formation 2000–2010: A review of longitudinal research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 75–94. 5.
  22. Mendoza, E.D. (2003). Guidance and Counseling Today: Rex Bookstore.
  23. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77-86.
  24. Pastor, C. K. L. (2020). Sentiment analysis on synchronous online delivery of instruction due to extreme community quarantine in the Philippines caused by COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 1-6.
  25. Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2009). Career development, work, and occupational success. In M. C. Smith & N. DeFratesDensch (Eds.), Handbook of research on adult learning and development (pp. 412– 436). New York, NY: Routledge.
  26. Porfeli, E. J., Lee, B., Vondracek, F. W., & Weigold, I. K. (2011). A multi-dimensional measure of vocational identity status. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 853–871;
  27. Regner, I., Escribe, C., & Dupeyrat, C. (2007). Evidence of social comparison in mastery goals in natural academic settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 575-583.
  28. Savickas, M. L. (2011). Career counseling. In J. Carlson & M. Englar-Carlson (Eds.), Theories of psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Pyschological Association.
  29. Schlossberg, S.M., Morris, J.D., & Lieberman, M.G.(2001).  The Effects of a Counselor-led Guidance Intervention on Learners’ Behaviors and Attitudes. Professional School Counseling.
  30. Skorikov, V. B., & Vondracek, F. W. (2007). Vocational identity. In V. B. Skorikov & W. Patton (Eds.), Career development in childhood and adolescence (pp. 143–168). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  31. Taskaya, S.M. & Kurt, Y. (2010). The opinions of primary school teachers about school guidance services at primary schools. Paper presented at the 2010 international Conference on new trends in education and their implications.
  32. Villlar, Imelda V.G. (2007).  Implementing a Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Program in the Philippines.
  33. Villarreal-Davis, C., Sartor, T. A., & McLean, L. (2020). Utilizing Creativity to Foster Connection in Online Counseling Supervision. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 1-14.
  34. Wiles, J. W., & Bondi, J. C. (2014). Curriculum development: A guide to practice (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  35. Wright, P. M., Craig, M. W. (2011) Tool for assessing responsibility-based education (TARE): Instrument development, content validity, and inter-rater reliability. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 15(3): 204–219.
  36. Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic