HomeHealth Sciences Journalvol. 12 no. 1 (2023)

A descriptive cross-sectional study on the motivation of work-from-home office workers in the National Capital Region

Clark Anthony Trovela | Jennifer Marie L. San Juan | Marian Angelica C. Tria | Sofia Kairie T. Tria | Katrina Isabel G. Trinchera | Albertito Luis V. Tuazon | Christine Joyce J. Tumabini | Ezekiel Maloloy On | Maria Lourdes D. Sta. Ana

 

Abstract:

Introduction The landscape of work has changed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic as more companies shifted from face-to-face to the work-from-home (WFH) setup. This change has affected several aspects of human life especially the motivation to WFH. The study aimed to determine the motivation of WFH among office workers in the National Capital Region (NCR) from March 2020 to February 2022. Methods Using a descriptive cross-sectional study design, an online survey of WFH office workers around the NCR, Philippines was conducted. A 26-item questionnaire on motivation covering dimensions of availability (flexibility), safety (work-life balance), and meaningfulness (work performance) was used. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24. Results A total of 252 respondents were included in the study, with a majority identifying as females aged 21 to 30, never married, and college graduates. Additionally, respondents reported having one to five years of work experience and were employed in professional/technical/managerial fields. Regarding the impact of remote work, the findings indicated that most individuals who worked from home (WFH) felt motivated by this setup due to its positive effects on availability, time and cost savings from reduced commuting, and the flexibility it provided for managing their schedules according to personal preferences. Furthermore, in terms of safety and conducive work environment, WFH office workers expressed agreement that the remote work setup contributed to a favorable work environment, leading to increased job satisfaction. This setup allowed them to effectively balance work responsibilities with personal and family commitments. The study also revealed that WFH office workers perceived a sense of meaningfulness in their work, as they felt trusted and valued by their employers. This sentiment contributed to their overall well-being, both physically and mentally Conclusion Work-from-home office workers are generally always motivated in terms of availability (flexibility), safety (work-life balance) and meaningfulness (work performance).



References:

  1. Caillier JG. The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. federal government agency. The American Review of Public Administration. 2011;42(4):461–80.
  2. Zamani NF, Ghani MH, Radzi SF, Rahmat NH, Kadar NS, Azram AA. A study of work from home motivation among employees. Int J Asian Soc Sci 2021;11(8):388–98.
  3. Abdullah NA, Rahmat NH, Zawawi FZ, Khamsah MA, Anuarsham AH. Coping with post COVID-19: Can work from home be a new norm? Eur J Soc Sci Stud 2020;5(6).
  4. Kalliath T, Brough P. Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. J Manag Organiz 2008;14(3):323–7.
  5. Sahu KK, Chavan BS, Bala C, & Tyagi S. Reliability and validity of the screening tool for assessment of psychosocial problems. Open J Psychiatr Allied Sci 2019; 10(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-2061.2019.00039.9
  6. Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, GayetAgeron A. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Qual Life Res 2014;24(1):147–51.
  7. Rioveros GM, Reyes-Chua E, Navigar NR, Solina AM, Lanuza MH, Garcia MS. The impact of work from home set-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Worldwide J Multidiscipl Res Dev 2021 http://wwjmrd.com/upload/the-impact-of-work-from-home-set-up-during-the-covid19-pandemic_1631623804.
  8. Raišiene AG, Rapuano V, Varkuleviciute K. Sensitive men and hardy women: How do millennials, xennials and gen x manage to work from home?. J Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2021 Mar 25;7(2):106.
  9. Arntz M, Ben Yahmed S, Berlingieri F. Working from home and COVID-19: The chances and risks for gender gaps. Intereconomics 2020 Nov;55(6):381-6.
  10. Caringal-Go JF, Teng-Calleja M, Bertulfo DJ, Manaois JO. Work-life balance crafting during COVID-19: exploring strategies of telecommuting employees in the Philippines [Internet]. Taylor and Francis Online. Taylor & Francis Online; 2021 [cited 2021Nov19]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.1956880
  11. Kooli C. Challenges of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic for women in the UAE. J Public Affairs 2022 Jul 6:e2829.
  12. Aczel B, Kovacs M, Van Der Lippe T, Szaszi B. Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges. PloS one 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249127.
  13. Kazekami S. Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommunications Policy 2020 Mar 1;44(2):101868.
  14. Scheibe S, De Bloom J, Modderman T. Resilience during crisis and the role of age: involuntary telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environm Res Public Health 2022 Feb 4;19(3):1762.
  15. Golden TD, Eddleston KA. Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. J Vocat Behav 2020 Feb 1;116:103348.
  16. Fields GS & Simons T. The impact of working at home on career outcomes of professional employees [Electronic version]. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada. 1995.