Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 3 no. 5 (2022)

Remedial Reading Program in the Schools Division of Iloilo: Challenges and Effective Practices

Romnick Sancada

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The purpose of this qualitative study is to describe remedial reading program challenges and effective practices. This study is anchored on the grounded theory using the Glaserian approach, and it follows the inductive approach for theory development through progressive identification and integration of categories of meaning from the challenges and effective practices of teachers in remedial reading. The data collection was participated by five (5) participants conducted at the Schools Division of Iloilo for the school year 2018-2019. Sampling size was based on theorizing and not on the data saturation and methods of analysis were discussed. Results reveal that there are seven (7) themes generated. Based on observations, data were gathered, analytical data mining techniques were used to analyze data and detect the pattern, then a testable hypothesis was formulated, and lastly, a theory was generated. Observations and patterns were the basis of development of a theory. Themes generated are Facilitator’s Challenging Practices, Remedial Reading Innovations, Teachers’ Motivation, Authentic Tasks, Cognitive Readiness, Personal Drive and Trained Teachers. Thus, the theory developed is “Quality Remedial Instruction Theory”.



References:

  1. Agee, J. 2009 Developing Qualitative Research Questions: a Reflective Process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431-447.
  2. Alcantara, R. et.al, (2001). Remedial reading: a handbook for teachers and students. Quezon City: Phoenix Press Inc.
  3. Allan, G. 2003 A Critique of Using Grounded Theory as a Research Method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-10.
  4. Alumbro, E.C., (2001). The reading skills of the VISCA, foundation elementary school pupils: A basis for an improved reading instruction. Master's Thesis, Cebu Normal University, Cebu City
  5. Bernard, H.R. (2011) Research Methods in Anthropology, Second Edition. London: Sage Publications
  6. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
  7. Bond G. L., (2000). Reading difficulties: Their diagnosis and correction, MA: A Division of Simon and Schuster Inc
  8. Bond, G. L., Bond, E., & Wagner, E. B. (1941). Developmental reading in high school. New York: Macmillan.
  9. Cao, Y., (2010). Literacy boost 2009 assessment: philippines. Prepared for Philippines Country Office, Save the Children
  10. Carnine, D. W., (2007). Direct reading instruction, New Jersey: Prejudice Hall In.
  11. Cabalquinto, M .A ( n.d.). Developmental reading 2: The teaching of reading. Self-made Module. Cebu Normal University, Cebu City, Philippines.
  12. Caggiano, J.A. (2007). Addressing the learning needs of struggling adolescent readers: The impact of a reading intervention program on students in a middle school setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
  13. Charmaz, K. 2002 Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis London Sage Publications.
  14. Connor, H.O. & Gibson, N. (n.d.) A Step-by-Step Guite to Qualitative Data Analysis. A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health.
  15. Conde, J.T., (2008). The reading skills evaluation of grade vi pupils: the phil. iri model. Master's Thesis, Cebu Normal University, Cebu City.
  16. Creswell, J.W. 2012 Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  17. Cristina, M., Jacqueline, P., & Francesco, P.,(2010) A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications. Service Science 2(1-2):126-135. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126
  18. Crooks, D.L. 2001 The Importance of Symbolic Interaction in Grounded Theory Research on Women’s Health. Health Care for Women International 22,11-27.
  19. Crotty, M. 2003 The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspectives in the Research Process, London: Sage Publications, 3rd edition, 10.
  20. Deshler, D. D., & Hock, M. F. (2007). Adolescent literacy: Where we are, where we need to go. Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need, 9812
  21. Dacalos, Datulayta, Davis, et.al, (2016) Effective teaching Practices in handling non readers. Unpublished study of Professional Education and Pedagogy Department, College of Teacher Education, Cebu Normal University, Cebu City, Philippines. Retrieved: http://www.apjmr.com/wp- content/uploads/2016/07/APJMR-2016.4.3.07.pdf
  22. Department of Education, Philippines. DO 45, S. 2002 –Reading Literacy Program In The Elementary Schools
  23. Department of Education, Philippines. DO 14, S. 2018 – Policy Guidelines On The Administration Of The Revised Philippine Informal Reading Inventory
  24. Department of Education, Philippines. Memorandum 244, s. 2011 Declaring November As National Reading Month Of Every Year And November 25, 2011 As The Nationwide Araw Ng Pagbasa
  25. Diamond, L. (2006) Implementing and sustaining an effective reading program. The Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc.Retrievedhttps://www.shastacoe.org/uploaded/Dept/i s/general/Teacher_Section/COREBriefingPaperK- 8Reading.pdf
  26. Fosudo, S. (2010). Reading as part to success. A Lecture delivered at the College Library Day, Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education, Otto/Ijanikin, Lagos on February 24th
  27. Feleo, J. (2012) The Importance of a having school reading program retrieved:http://depedne.net/default.asp?page= news&action=details&opt=popup&REFECODE=AT12070016
  28. Goldenberg, C. (2004). Promoting early literacy development among Spanish speaking children: Lessons from two studies. In E.H. Hiebert & B.M. Taylor (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start (pp. 171-200). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  29. Heinemann, Z. (2012) Best Practice, Fourth Edition. Retrieved:https://medium.com/@heinemann/these-18- practices-are-proven-effective-for-teaching-reading- 5ea6c9424fa0
  30. Hock, M. F., & Deshler, D. D. (2003). Don’t forget the adolescents. Principal Leadership, 4(3), 50-56.
  31. International Reading Association, (2009). Using multiple methods of beginning reading instruction: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, Delaware: Author
  32. Holloway & Wheeler (2002) Qualitative Research Procedures. London Sage Publications.
  33. International Reading Association. (2002). Summary of the National Reading Panel report: Teaching children to read. Newark, DE: Author.
  34. Infante, D.A., Rancer, A.S. & Womack, D.F. (1997). Building communication theory. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press.
  35. Joseph, L. (2002) Best Practices in Planning Interventions for Students With Reading Problems Retrieved:http://www.readingrockets.org/article/best- practices-planning-interventions-students-reading- problems
  36. Jones, S. (2011)"The impact of a reading intervention program on students with reading difficulties".Theses and Dissertations. 303. http://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/303
  37. Kinberg, M. (2006). Your teaching reading in the content areas of elementary teachers [Google Books version]. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/DsN21U
  38. Kamil, M. (2003). Adolescent Literacy: Reading for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
  39. Losh, M. A. (1991). The effect of the strategies intervention model on the academic achievement of junior high learning-disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
  40. Martin, P. & Pappas P., ( 2006). Strategies for Struggling Readers. Retrieved from http://www.peterpappas.com/blogs/read-blog/nonreader- complete.pdf
  41. Mary, N. (2012) Effective interventions for struggling readers.Retrieved:https://www.education.ie/en/Educatio n-Staff/Information/NEPS-Literacy Resource/neps_literacy_good_practice_guide.pdf
  42. Nedira, E.N., (2009). Students' reading inventory: Constructivist-based reading unit plan. Master's Thesis, Cebu Normal University, Cebu City.
  43. Nichols, S. (2014)"An Evaluation of a Remedial Reading Program for Middle-Grade Students in a Southeastern State Public School" (. Education Dissertations and Projects. 19. https://digitalcommons.gardner- webb.edu/education_etd/19
  44. Polit.et.al., (2001) A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis London Sage Publications.
  45. Pressley, M. (2000). Reading comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  46. Reading/Language Arts Framework for California Public Schools 1999, p. 11)
  47. Read on Get on Campaign, (2014). How reading can help children escape from poverty .london: save the children. Retrieved December 14, 2018 from http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/ images/Read_On_Get_On.pdf
  48. Roskos Kathleen, Neuman Susan B. (2014). Best Practices in Reading: A 21st Century Skill Update. The Reading Teacher, 67(7), 507–511. doi: 10.1002/trtr.1248 Retrieved http://www.readingrockets.org/article/best- practices-reading-21st-century-skill-update
  49. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  50. Scanlon, D. M., & Vellutino, F. R., (2003). A comparison of the instructional backgrounds and cognitive profiles of poor, average, and good readers who were initially identified as at risk for reading failure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 191-215.
  51. Silverman, D. 2011 Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.
  52. Torgesen, J., (2004). Struggling readers: what works for intermediate level students. pennsylvania: the florida center for reading research. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from http://www.fcrr.org/science/pdf/torgesen/penn_spec i al_ed.pdf
  53. Wolf, M., (2007). Proust and the squid: the story and science of the reading brain. New York: Harper Collins.
  54. Ysatam, E.I. (2009). DepEd's basic literacy program: cordero's vs. calderon's reading models. Master's Thesis, Cebu Normal University, Cebu City
  55. Zunguze, S.J., (2011). Teachers’ views on factors contributing to low level reading levels among Mozambican primary school pupils. Dissertation, University of Zambia. Retrieved from http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1 23456789/1993/salvador00001.PDF?sequence=1

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic