HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 3 no. 5 (2022)

Implementation of DepEd Support Programs: Basis for an Enhanced Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism

Ronilo Palingcod

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to assess the level of implementation of support programs and the level of efficiency of the existing monitoring and evaluation of programs in public secondary schools of the 3rd congressional district of Bohol in school year 2018-2019. The survey method was employed using a self-made questionnaire. The gathering tool underwent pilot testing and the reliability was good. In the actual survey, detailed explanation was provided by the researcher which guided the respondents in answering the items properly. They were informed, beforehand, that data confidentiality was an essential consideration and that whatever their responses may be, the data gathered including their personal identity will be held confidential. Questionnaires were retrieved right away and then the gathered data were statistically treated to test the hypotheses. After data gathering, it was revealed that there was difference in the level of implementation of support programs and in the level of efficiency of the existing M&E mechanism used which meant that the two major categories of programs were not in the same way implemented, monitored and evaluated in the schools. It was concluded that School Health and Nutrition Programs (SHNP) were likely given higher priority in terms of program implementation, monitoring and evaluation than Dropout Reduction Programs (DORP). Hence, an enhanced monitoring and evaluation tool was developed to guide all concerned individuals in the future implementation, monitoring and evaluation of support programs in the Department of Education.



References:

  1. Blondal (2013). Theory of Change: How to Navigate Towards Positive Social Change in Complex Settings. Faglight Fokus. Osney Mead, Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. Daniels (2009). Engaging Stakeholders. RMC Research Corporation, Arlington VA
  3. Durban et. al. (2010). Asian journal of social science & humanities issues and concerns of the Philippine education through the years. Far Eastern University, Manila; University of San Agustin Iloilo City, Philippines
  4. Engela, Ronette, and Tania Ajam (2010). Implementing a Governmentwide Monitoring and Evaluation System in South Africa. Independent Evaluation Group, ECD Working Paper Series 21, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  5. Fao Otiendo (2012). The Roles of Monitoring and Evaluation in Projects Engineering Programme Group. Technikon, Southern Africa
  6. Green, D (2013). What is a theory of change and how do we use it? A u g u s t 2 0 1 3 . F r o m http://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/what-is-a-theory-of-change-and-does-it-a ctually-help/
  7. Kusek & Rist (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: a handbook for development practitioners. WorldBank, Washington D.C.
  8. Monse B. et al. (2010) Manual for teachers for the implementation of essential health care program in schools. Fit for School Inc., Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
  9. O’Flynn, M (2012). Theory of Change: What’s it all about? ONTRAC no. 51, INTRAC, Osney Mead, Oxford, United Kingdom
  10. Otiebo (2012). The Roles of Monitoring and Evaluation in Projects. World Bank, Washington D.C.