HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 4 no. 1 (2022)

Challenges in Handling Student Records and Characteristics of Student Information Management System in Public Secondary School in Marilao South District IV Bulacan

Joseph Riño | Crisanto Daing

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the challenges in the management of student records and identified the characteristics of the Student Record Management System Program for 140 public secondary school teachers of Marilao South District in the Schools Division of Bulacan. It used a descriptive research design and utilized a validated researcher-made questionnaire to collect the quantitative data for this study. The findings of the study revealed that in terms of the demographic profile of the respondents, out of one hundred forty (140) teacher-respondents, 68 or 48.57% belongs to 30-39 years old, 57.14% are females, 39.28% completed undergraduate degree level of education. With regard to the length of service in 46.42% are in 6 - 15 years in service, and in terms of rank -out of fifty-two (52) or 37.14% are Teacher I. On the challenges encountered by the teachers, in entering data, it shows an average of 4.27, described as Highly Agree. On the other hand, in saving student’s information, shows that teachers perceived moderately that on the difficulties encountered by the teachers as it averages to 4.15 which is statistically described as Agree. When it comes to the characteristics of an ideal student information management system, it shows that teachers perceived moderately that as it averages to 2.83 which is statistically described as Agree. Likewise, in the usefulness and functionality, it shows that teachers perceived moderately as it averages to 4.62, Agree. There is no significant difference in the challenges encountered by the respondents when grouped according to their demographic profile. There is no significant difference in the assessment of the characteristics encountered by the respondents when groupedaccording to their demographic profile.



References:

  1. Ahmad. (2010). A Novel Database Design for Student Information System. Journal of Computer Science, 6(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2010.43.46
  2. Alkuwari, M.M/ QATAR UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies College of Engineering. (2014). On The National Students Information System A Thesis in Computer Science and Engineering.
  3. Bailit, H., Koslowsky, M., Grasso, J., Holzman, S., Levine, R., Valluzzo, P. & Atwood, P. (1974). Quality of dental care: development of standards. The Journal of the American Dental Association89(4), 842-853. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1974.0506
  4. Bayangan-Cosidon, E./ Lalinga State Univerity. (2016). Student Information System for Kalinga State University-Rizal Campus.
  5. Betts, J. R., Zau, A., Rice, L., & Public Policy Institute of California. (2003). Determinants of student achievement: New evidence from San Diego. Public Policy Instit. of CA.
  6. Bharamagoudar, S.R., Geeta R.B., & Totad, S.G. (2013). “Web Based Student Information Management System”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering2(6), 2342- 2348. https://www.ijarcce.com/upload/2013/june/4-
  7. Dy, R. B., Larida, M. J. A., & Tanguilig, D. B. T. (2013). E-DoX:DEPED Student Grade Records Management System with Implementation of Advanced Encryption Standard and PKI Infrastructure. International Journal of Sciences, 1, 47.
  8. Eludire, A. A. (2011). The Design and Implementation of Student Academic Record Management System. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 33(8), 707-712.
  9. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
  10. Hand, J. S., & Reynolds, W. E. (1984). Dental record documentation in selected ambulatory care facilities. Public Health Rep99(6), 583–90. 
  11. Sari E. Helminen, Miira Vehkalahti,. (1998). Quality evaluation of oral health record-keeping for Finnish young adults. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica56(5), 288-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163598428464
  12. Johnson, D. R. (2011). A Quantitative Study of Teacher Perceptions of Professional Learning Communities' Context, Process, and Content. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs)15https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/15
  13. Llantos, O. E. (2015). my.eskwela: A Mobile Approach to Visual and Social Student Information System. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science1.
  14. Maggay, J. G. (2017). International Journal of Information Research and Review. Student information and accounting system of cagayan state university – lasam campus, Philippines4(2), 3701-3705. https://www.ijirr.com/sites/default/files/issues-pdf/1819.pdf
  15. Oliver, G., & Foscarini, F. (2014). Records management and information culture: Tackling the people problem. Facet Publishing.
  16. Otu, B. O., Bempah, o., & Amoako – Ohene, K. (2014). Management of Students’ Records at Koforidua Polytechnic: Implications for Good Governance. Information and Knowledge Management 4(11). ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online)
  17. Osborn, J. B., Stoltenberg, J. L., Newell, K. J., & Osborn, S. C. (2000). Adequacy of dental records in clinical practice: A survey of dentists. Journal of Dental Hygiene: JDH, 74(4), 297–306.
  18. Samiatu, A (2021). RECORD KEEPING PRACTICES OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN SAGNARIGU DISTRICT OF NORTHERN REGION OF GHANA. Afribary. Retrieved from https://afribary.com/works/record-keeping-practices-of-primary-school-teachers-in-sagnarigu-district-of-northern-region-of-ghana
  19. Student Services/Prevention and Wellness Team Wisconsin Department of Publication Instruction 125 South Webster Street P.O. Box 7841 Madison, WI 2018 Student Records and Confidentiality Wis. Stat. sec. 118.125. Section 2 of the UK Data Protection Act 1998 https://www.hw.ac.uk/services/docs/studentrecordsmanagement.pdf
  20. Sudarjat, J., Abdullah, T., & Sunaryo, W. (n.d.). Supervision, Leadership, and Working Motivation to Teachers’ Performance. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 7.
  21. The Learner Information System (LIS) was implemented in government schools and Community Learning Centers (CLCs) in September 2012 through DepEd Order Nos. 67, s. 2011 and 22, s. 2012
  22. Upward, F. (2005). The records continuum. Archives, 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-876938-84-0.50008-1.
  23. II. Definition of student records. (2012, August 23). Office of the Registrar - UCSC. https://registrar.ucsc.edu/records/disclosure/section2.html