Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 4 no. 6 (2022)

Perceived Effects of Online Learning on the Academic Performance of Senior High School Students

Michelle Viña | Richard Nieves | Carmie Aprilyn Ordoyo | Harold Macabitas | Rose Jean Gerodias | Hannah Bonimie Viaje | Dianna Quenikito | Bhai Zhaira Cambang

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aims to determine the perceived effects of online learning on the academic performance of senior high school students at Notre Dame of Midsayap College in the school year 2021-2022. The descriptive-correlational research design was employed in this study. A quota sampling with an equal allocation was used in choosing the respondents. The findings showed that the male and female respondents are equally represented, mostly 18 years old belonging to grades 11 and 12. In terms of the perceived effects of online learning, respondent neither agree nor disagree that online helps them comprehend the course materials, helps improve their academic performance and increases their academic output. Male and female respondents does not differ in their perception of online learning. The top challenges they experienced are lack of fieldwork and laboratory access, unavailability of gadgets and distractions by other websites when using smartphones or laptop. Finally, results revealed that respondent neither agreed nor disagreed on the perceived effects of online learning on the academic performance of senior high school students.



References:

  1. Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-23.
  2. Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). An outbreak of online learning in the COVID-19 outbreak in Sub-Saharan Africa: Prospects and challenges. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology.Alawnleh, Al-Twait and Al-Saht, 2020).
  3. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51.
  4. Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222.
  5. Almaiah et al. (2016, August 05). Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1
  6. Alwi, N. Ghadi, I., H., Bakar, K. A., & Talib, O. (2012). Construct Validity Examination of Critical Thinking Dispositions for Undergraduate Students in University Putra Malaysia. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 138-145.
  7. Amadora, M. (2020, September 18). Common Problems that Occur During Online Classes.
  8. Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2020). The Effect of Online Learning on Communication between Instructors and Students during COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, Ahead-of-Print.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131.
  9. Aung, T. N., & Khaing, S. S. (2015, August). Challenges of implementing e-learning in developing countries: A review. In International conference on genetic and evolutionary computing (pp. 405-411). Springer, Cham.
  10. Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100(7).
  11. Bhagat, K. K., Wu, L. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Development and validation of the perception of students towards online learning (POSTOL). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 350-359.
  12. Belgica, C. C., Calugan, J. A., Dumo, J. U., & Simber, L. (2020, December). Online distance learning: Thematic study on the challenges faced by Educare College Inc. primary pupils. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Education, Teaching & Learning, Oxford, UK (pp. 18-20).
  13. Bilgiç, P et al. (2015). Usability of a smartphone food picture app for assisting 24-hour dietary recall: a pilot study. Nutrition research and practice, 9(2), 207-212.
  14. Boz, B., & Adnan, M. (2017). How do freshman engineering students reflect an online calculus course?. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(4), 262-278.
  15. Brown, B., Schroeder, M., & Eaton, S. E. (2016). Designing Synchronous Online Interactions and Discussions. Online Submission.Burns, M. (2011). Distance education for teacher training: Modes, models, and methods.Carmichael & Steyn, 2018
  16. Budur, T. (2020). The role of online teaching tools on the perception of the students during the lockdown of Covid-19. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(3), 178-190.
  17. Chaney, D., Chaney, E., & Eddy, J. (2010). The context of distance learning programs in higher education: Five enabling assumptions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4), 1-7.
  18. Cung, B., Xu, D., & Eichhorn, S. (2018). Increasing Interpersonal Interactions in an Online Course: Does Increased Instructor Email Activity and Voluntary Meeting Time in a Physical Classroom Facilitate Student Learning?. Online Learning, 22(3), 193-215.Dabbagh et al. 2019).
  19. Dabbagh, N., & Castaneda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3041-3055.
  20. Davis, N. L., Gough, M., & Taylor, L. L. (2019). Online teaching: advantages, obstacles and tools for getting it right. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 19(3), 256-263.Eltahir, M. E. (2019). E-learning in developing countries: Is it a panacea? A case study of Sudan. IEEE Access, 7, 97784-97792.
  21. Dove, C. A. (2020). Online Learning Challenges for Our US Veterans Unable to Physically Attend College (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  22. Friesen and Kuskis, 2013; Xu and Jaggars, 2014 Edmunds et al., 2019).Negative Impacts from the Shift to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Crisis: Evidence from a Statewide Community College System. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai20-299.pdf
  23. Gašević, D et al. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68-84.
  24. Grundmann et al.2010). The implementation and growth of an international online forensic science graduate program at the University of Florida. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(1).
  25. Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017, June). Student engagement in online learning: A review. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 39-43). IEEE.
  26. Hobfoll, (1988, 1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-29399-001
  27. Ismail, A. O., Mahmood, A. K., & Abdelmaboud, A. (2018). Factors Influencing Academic Performance of Students in Blended and Traditional Domains. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2).
  28. Jacob, B. et al (2019). Online learning, offline outcomes: Online course taking and high school student performance. Aera Open, 5(1), 2332858419832852.
  29. Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 10968-10978.
  30. Lederman, H. (2018). Online Education: Worldwide Status, Challenges, Trends and implications. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262
  31. Lee, Y. G., Stringer, D. Y., & Du, J. (2017). What determines students’ preference of online to F2F class. Business Education Innovation Journal, 9(2), 97-102.
  32. Mualim, R., & Saputra, M. F. (2021). Optimizing Online Learning during Covid 19 Pandemic in Junior High School. Journal of Islamic Education Students (JIES), 1(1), 19-27.
  33. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27.
  34. Nistor, A. et al (2013, May). Toddler: Detecting performance problems via similar memory-access patterns. In 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 562-571). IEEE.
  35. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2010). Collaborating online: Learning together in community (Vol. 32). John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14.Rost, M. (2019). Online Distance Learning: Thematic Study on the Challenges Faced By Educare College Inc. Primary Pupils. https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/30-10340.pdf
  37. Park, S. (2017). Analysis of time-on-task, behavior experiences, and performance in two online courses with different authentic learning tasks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 213-233.
  38. Singh, N., Tang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zheng, C. (2020). COVID-19 waste management: effective and successful measures in Wuhan, China. Resources, conservation, and recycling, 163, 105071.
  39. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.
  40. Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851.
  41. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204.
  42. Tan, C. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student motivation, community of inquiry and learning performance. Asian Education and Development Studies.
  43. Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. International review of research in open and distributed learning, 16(1), 120-141.
  44. Van Haeften, S., Milic, A., Addison‐Smith, B., Butcher, C., & Davies, J. M. (2021). Grass Gazers: Using citizen science as a tool to facilitate practical and online science learning for secondary school students during the COVID‐19 lockdown. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3488-3500.
  45. Vygotsky, L. S., Luriâ, A. R., Knox, J. E., & Golod, V. I. (2013). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Psychology Press.Lodge, 2018
  46. Walberg, H. J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity.
  47. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633-659.
  48. Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-17.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic