Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 5 no. 3 (2022)

Factors Influencing Academic Performance in English of Grade 11 Students TVL Track in the Schools Division of Quezon: Basis for Policy Intervention

Myreen De Los Santos

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the factors influencing academic performance in English of Grade 11 TVL students in the Schools Division of Quezon. It described the important numerical data through the use of tables. The respondents profile and the factors influencing academic performance in English were statistically treated using percentage, mean and Kruskal –Wallis H test. This study used descriptive method of research. This investigation found out that Grade 11 students TVL track are in the “very satisfactory” level in terms of Academic Performance in Reading and Writing. Consequently, the level of influence in student-related factors got a mean of 3.27 which is “Influential”. The level of influence of teacher-related factors got a mean of 3.72 which is “More Influential”. There is a strong relationship between the level of influence of the student-related factors, teacher-related factors and the academic performance of Grade 11 students TVL track in Reading and Writing. As a result, there shall be a policy intervention that will provide differentiated instruction and apply appropriate teachers? personality traits in teaching and learning process. It must be responsive to the level and needs of the learners along with the development of student attitude towards learning English as a global language and a means of communication.



References:

  1. Abaidoo (2018). Factors contributing to academic performance of s t u d e n t s in a J u n i o r Hi g h S c h o o l . G r i n . https://www.grin.com/document/450284
  2. Arbaugh, J.B. (2010). Online and Blended Business Education for t h e 2 1 s t C e n t u r y https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781843346036500047
  3. Academic Performance. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2021, from BALLOTPEDIA: https://ballotpedia.org/Academic_performance
  4. Ag, P. L. (2009). International Academic Publisher. New York.
  5. Ahmed, S. (2015). Attitude towards English Language among EFL Learners at UMSKAL.Journal of Educaiton and Practice, 6 (18).
  6. Alber, R. (2014). 6 Scaffolding Strategies to Use With Your S t u d e n t s . R e t r i e v e d 2 0 1 1 , f r o m https://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessons-six-strategies-rebecca-alber
  7. Attaprechakul, D. (2013). Inference Strategies to Improve Reading Comprehension of Challenging Texts. English Language Teaching. Ballotpedia.
  8. Barera, M. (2013). The Role and Design of Instructional Material. Prezi.
  9. Bartleby.com (2021). English is the Most Important School Subject f o r S t u d e n t s t o L e a rn . https://www.bartleby.com/essay/English-is-the-Most-Important-Schoo-Subject-FKJ5TYAX73U4Z?fbclid=IwAR3r6YmiNMx7BgKQPUA5Ah5YeB1ll5to7DfYJSEQc7v8xr_OoY_3gjccZk
  10. Cabaysa and Baetiong (2010). Language Learning Strategies of Students at Different Levels of Speaking Proficiency. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277049517_Language_Learning_Strategies_of_Students_at_Different_Levels_of_
    Speaking_Proficiency
  11. Credé, M. A. (2008). The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425-453.
  12. Cary. (2003). Statistics. SAS Institute Inc.
  13. CC. (2020). Levels of Comprehension. Cuesta College.
  14. Cherry, K. (2021). The Big Five Personality Traits.
  15. Chrisholm, M. A. (2008). Pharmacy College Admission Test . Barron's Educational Series, Inc.
  16. College, C. (2020). Analogies. Student Success Scorecard.
  17. Creswell, W. J. (n.d.). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.
  18. Dark Matter Media (2017) Age and Language Learning.
  19. Dutta, R., et.,al. (2017) TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS AND RELATED CHARACTERISTICS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education. v07i01-16.pdf (tojned.net)
  20. Economist. (2019). More children around the world are being taught in English, often badly. The Economist .
  21. Fajrianor, A. (2018). Vocabulary Analogy as Instructional in Enhancing Reading Comprehension. ResearchGate.
  22. FIS. (2020). Understanding mistakes in written language. Frankfurt International School.
  23. Fleming, L. (2014). Reading for Results. Reading Center.
  24. Foley, B. (2018). Purposive Sampling 101. SurveyGizmo.
  25. Foster, R. (2011). Analogies for Critical Thinking. New York: Teacher Created Resources, 3.
  26. Fraction4kids.com. (n.d.). Retrieved 2021, from Reasons why s t u d e n t s s l e e p i n c l a s s : https://www.fractions4kids.com/reasons-why-students-sleep-in-class/
  27. Furqon, F. (2016). Correlation Between Student's Vocabulary Mastery and their Reading Comprehension. Retrieved from Thesis of U n i v e r s i t a s P e n d i d i k a n , I n d o n e s i a :
    www.upi.eduperpustakaan.upi.edu
  28. Garrett, M. (2009). Teacher personality: does it influence effectiveness and student achievement in the classroom? . Rowan Digital Works.
  29. Goundar, P. (2015). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of English as Foreign Language (EFL) Learners: a Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926.
  30. Greenwood, S. C. (n.d.). How to Use Analogy Instruction to Reinforce Vocabulary . Middle School Journal, 11-13.
  31. Goodwyn, A. (2021). Ontologies of English. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Han, J. and Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, V o l u m e 3 , 2 0 1 6 - I s s u e 1 . https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
  33. Harland, Darci J. An Introduction to Experimental Research.
  34. Hashim, et.al., (2014). Relationship between Teacher‟s Personality, Monitoring, Learning Environment, and Students‟ EFL Performance. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies 101Volume 14(1).
  35. Hopper, E. (2020). A Review on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Retrieved from ThoughtCo.
  36. Jppaguio. (2021). Why Filipinos/ Students Have a Hard Time Speaking English? The Research Paper Factory.
  37. Kail, R. (n.d.). Human Development: A Life-Span View 5th Edition. Belmont, USA: WADSWORTH.
  38. Kampen, M. (2019). How Mastery Learning Helps Every Student Succeed. Karthigeyan (2012) Vol2, No 2. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices.
  39. Kusiak, M. (2013). Reading Comprehension in Polish and English: Evidence From an Introspective . Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press.
  40. Kusmaryati , E. Exploring Students Interests in Learning English (2017). English Education Department. Lew, W.J.F. (1977). Teaching and the teacher‟s personality.Educatin J o u r n a l , N o V I .http://www.sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/review/33/3300006.pdf
  41. LI. (2020). Teaching Students to Compare and Contrast when Reading. Literacy Ideas.
  42. LIFTS. (2020). Sequencing . Literacy Ideas for Teachers and Students.
  43. Likert. (2020). The Likert Scale Debate: Reliability & Validity. Teaching-Family Association.
  44. Linde, S. (2003-2020). Essential Reading Comprehension Skills. Study.com.
  45. Loveless, B. (2021). 10 Habits of Highly Effective Students. Education Corner.
  46. Lumen. (2020). Compare/Contrast Essays. Lumen Learning .
  47. McLeod, S. (2018) Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
  48. McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading Comprehension Strategies. Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. London: Lawrence Eribaum Associates., 3.
  49. MIF. (2017). Weighted Mean. Math is Fun.
  50. Minchen, B. J. (2007). The Effects of Classr ects of Classroom Seating on Students' P oom Seating on Students' Performance in a formance in a High School Science Setting . The College at Brockport: State University of New York .
  51. Mojavezi, A. (2012) The Impact of Teacher Self-efficacy on Students‟ Motivation and Achievement. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266459581_The_Impact_o f _ T e a c h e r _ S e l f -efficacy_on_the_Students'_Motivation_and_Achievement
  52. Mondal, P. (2021). 7 Important Factors that May Affect the Learning Process. Your Article Library .
  53. Moyle, K. (n.d.). Student Reaction to Learning with Technologies: Perceptions and Outcomes. USA, IGI.
  54. NAEP. (2019). The NAEP Reading Scale. National Assessment of Educational Progress.
  55. Nijs, V. (2019). Basics > Means > Compare means. Radiant-rstats.
  56. Nunan. (2010). Step by Step Basic Statistics Using SAS. CENGAGE Learning: Op. Cit.,Hatcher.
  57. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching . New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 74.
  58. Nuthana, P.G., and Yenagi, G.V. (2009). Influence of study habits, self-concept on academic achievement of boys and girls. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture science, 22 (5), 1 135-1 138. 2005.
  59. Osa-Edoh, G. and Alutu, A. (2012). A survey of student‟s study habits in selected secondary schools: Implication for counseling. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 4 (3), 228-234. Retrieved from https://maxwellsci.com/print/crjss/v4-228-234.pdf
  60. Ponmozhi, D. (2017). Difficulties Faced By the Rural Students in Learning English at High School Level . IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) , PP 31-34 .
  61. Richards, J. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University, 45.
  62. Rogers, K. (2020). The Effects of Classroom Seating Layouts on Participation and Assessment Performance in a Fourth Grade Classroom. Journal of Learning Spaces Volume 9, Number 1. 2020.
  63. Sari, D. N. (2006). Buku Aktifitas Siswa Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: PT Kompas Limu.
  64. Sisson, D. (2014). Close Reading in Elementary School (Bridging Readers and Text Together). New York: Routledge.
  65. StatCan. (2015). Using basic statistical techniques. Statistics Canada. Strategies . (1999-2021). Retrieved from do2Learn: https://do2learn.com/disabilities/CharacteristicsAndStrategies/TwiceExeptional_Strategies.html
  66. Sugiyono, M. (2000). Dandung Alfabeta. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  67. TeacherThrive. (2020). Build Vocabulary with Word Analogies. TESOL. (n.d.). Vocabulary and Its Importance in Language Learning . Teaching Vocabulary .
  68. Thosar, A. (2021). Teachers Must Timely Update. The Progressive Teacher.
  69. Ulug, M. (2011) The effects of teachers‟ attitudes on students‟ personality and performance.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic