Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 8 no. 10 (2023)

Learners’ Behavior Towards Online Learning Modality

Afidah Hadji Ali | Omar Hussien

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

A study on learners’ behavior towards online learning modality of the Grade 12 students was conducted at ALBangsamoro Shari’ah and Professional Education College Inc., Marawi City in the school year 2022 – 2023. There were ninety-seven (97) respondents who participated in the study. The study's main objective was to determine the respondents' personal profile and learners’ behavior towards online learning modality. The study used descriptive-correlational research design. The results of the investigation revealed that majority of the respondents were female. This finding implied that the female population was dominant in the study. It was also revealed that AL-Bangsamoro Shari’ah and Professional Education College was dominated by female students. The findings displayed which proved by the other researchers that some private and public schools in Marawi City, such as AL-Bangsamoro Shari’ah and Professional Education College were populated more by females, which was more prevalent than males. In addition, the study further displayed that most of the respondents were 18-19 years old. Majority belonged to 3rd to 4th sibling rank. In addition, the study further revealed that majority of the respondents had 5,999 or below parent’s monthly income while the least number of the respondents had 6,000 to 10,999 parent’s monthly income. Hence, it was apparent that the grade 12 Senior High School students of AL-Bangsamoro Shari’ah and Professional Education College Marawi City were having difficulties in facing the new normal academic system based on their experiences in terms oftheir socio-demographic profile and the learner’s behavior towards online learning modality.



References:

  1. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory & empirical tests. Internet & Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
  2. Akbari Ajayi, P. O., & Ajayi, L. F. (2020). Use of online collaborative learning strategy in enhancing postgraduates ’ learning outcomes in science education. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(8), 504– 510. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.4023.
  3. Anggoro, K., & Rueangrong, P. (2020). Facebook: An alternative learning platform for online English as a foreign language instruction in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Education N a r e s u a n U n i v e r s i t y , 2 3 ( 1 ) , 413 - 423. h t t p s : / / s o 0 6 . t c i t h a i j o . o r g / i n d e x . p h p / edujou rn al_nu/article/v iew/24 4419 .
  4. Avila, E. C., & Lavadia, M. K. S. (2019). Investigation of the acceptability and effectiveness of academic podcasts to college students ’ scholastic performance in Science. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12 (34) (September), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i34/127382.
  5. Beaven, T. (2018). Dark reuse’: an empirical study of teachers’ OER e n g a g e m e n t . O p e n P r a x i s , 1 0 ( 4 ) , 377. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.5944 /op enpraxis.10 .4 .889 .
  6. Bernabe, Jovi (2021). Learning and teaching with social media. https:// habieducation lab. Org/ lab notes/ learning – and – teachingwith-social- media/ February 2014.
  7. B.F. Skinner. (1990). Behavioral modification model theory.
  8. Bonafini, F. C. (2017). The effects of participants’ engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC for teachers’ professional d e v e l o p m e n t . O p e n P r a x i s , 9 ( 4 ) , 433. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.5944 /op enpraxis.9 .4.637.
  9. Bosch, T. E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching & learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communication: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 35(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500160903250648.
  10. Bossu, C., & Stagg, A. (2018). The potential role of open educational practice policy in transforming Australian higher e d u c a t i o n . O p e n P r a x i s , 1 0 ( 2 ) , 1 4 5 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.5944 /op enpraxis.10 .2 .835 .
  11. Bozkurt, A., & Akbulut, Y. (2019). Dropout patterns and cultural context in online networked learning spaces. Open Praxis, 11(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.940.
  12. Daher, W., & Shahbari, J. A. (2020). Secondary students ’ identities in the virtual classroom. Sustainability, 12, 1–13.
  13. Dikbas Torun, E. (2020). Online Distance Learning in Higher Education: Elearning Readiness as a Predictor of Academic Achievement. Open Praxis, 12(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1092. (DepEd Order No. 012 s. 2020).
  14. Dikbas Torun, E. (2020). Online distance learning in higher education: E-learning readiness as a predictor of academic a c h i e v e m e n t . O p e n P r a x i s , 1 2 ( 2 ) , 191. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.5944 /op enpraxis.12 .2 .109 2.
  15. Domínguez Figaredo, D., & Alvarez Alvarez, J. F. (2019). Structural changes in the landscape of Spanish distance universities. Open Praxis, 11(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.2.958.
  16. Ergün, E., & Kurnaz Adıbatmaz, F. B. (2020). Exploring the predictive role of e learning readiness and e-learning style on student e n g a g e m e n t . O p e n P r a x i s , 1 2 ( 2 ) , 175. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.5944 /op enpraxis.12 .2 .107 2.
  17. Farhaniza P. Salimbo. (2021). Challenges of online learning modality to the college of education students. Unpublish Theses. SPC, Iligasn City.
  18. Gilbert B. (2015). Online learning revealing the benefits and challenges. Journal Publication.
  19. Gülbahar, Y., Kalelioğlu, F., & Madran, R.O. (2010). Sosyal ağların eğitim amaçlı kullanımı [Educational use of social networks. inettr 2010 Internet Conference in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey.
  20. Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. Heller, M. L., & Cassady, J. C. (n.d.). The impact of perceived barriers, academic anxiety, and resource management strategies on achievement in first year community college students. Unpublished Theses. 29(1), 9–32.
  21. Ilgaz, H., & Gülbahar, Y. (2020). Examining e-learners’ preferences and readiness satisfaction: A holistic modelling approach. Open Praxis, 12(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1070.
  22. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024.
  23. Knox, J. (2013). The limitations of access alone: Moving towards open processes In education technology. Open Praxis, 5(1), 21– 29. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36 Labrado, Y. (2020).
  24. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686- 694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008.
  25. Makina, A. (2020). Developing a framework for managing the quality use of podcasts in open distance and e- learning e n v i r o n m e n t s . O p e n P r a x i s , 1 2 ( 1 ) , 6 7 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.5944 /op enpraxis.12 .1 .990 .
  26. Manickam, Y., Selvam, N. D., & Ahrumugam, P. (2020). A study on the impact of collaborative learning on academic performance using Facebook in higher education . International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 2(1), 15–23.
  27. Michael K. Barbour & Thomas C. Reeves. (2009). The reality of virtual schools. A Review of The Literature”, Computers and Education 52.2 (2009), pp. 402-416.
  28. M. Lundin, Annika L. Andersson, & Hillman, T. (2020). Teachers’ identity in a professional Facebook group. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,1 9,205 – 222 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/h ttps://do i.o rg/10 .289 45/4 540
  29. Mohammadali, F. (2022). The new normal in education: perspective and challenges of private schools. Al-Bangsamoro Shari’ah and ProfessionalEducation.
  30. Marawi City. Nguyen T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. Vol. 11, No. 2.
  31. O’Brien, S. J. (2011). Facebook & other internet use & the academic performance of college students (Doctor of Phılosophy), Temple University. Online Collaborative Learning Theory (2012).
  32. Ooi, C. Y., & Loh, K. Y. (2010). Using online web 2.0 tools to promote innovative learning. In Q. Y. Wang, & S. C. Kong (Eds), Workshop Proceedings of the 14th Global Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 72-76). National Institute of Education.
  33. Ophus, J. D., & Abbitt, J. T. (2009). Exploring the potential perceptions of social n networking systems in university courses. Journal of Online Learning & T Teaching, 5(4), 639-648.
  34. Özdener, N., Güngör, Y., Yilmaz, F. G. K., Keser, H., Turner, Y., Stewart, D. W., & Hoff, E. (2010). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. C o m p u t e r s a n d E d u c a t i o n , 28(2),. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.001.
  35. Özmen, F., Aküzüm, C., Sünkür, M., & Baysal, N. (2011). Functionality of social networking sites in educational settings]. In Proceeding of the 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), (pp. 1618), Elazig, Turkey.
  36. Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education : A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23.
  37. Paul Van Port Fliet & Michael Anderson. (2013). Moving from online to hybrid course delivering increasing positive student outcome. Journal of Research in Innovative 6.1 (2013), Pp. 80-87.
  38. Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using social networking technology to enhance l Learning in higher education: A case study using Facebook. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International C o n f e r e n c e o n S y s t e m S c i e n c e s . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1109 /HICSS.201 1.4 79 Samani.
  39. Tananuraksakul, N. (2018). Facebook Messenger as the medium of academic consultation and the message in a Thai context. In e proceedings International Conference on Communication & Media, 18– 19 October 2018. https://www.academia.edu/40623176/.
  40. Wang, Q., Woo, H., Quek, C., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2011). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x.
  41. West, R. E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C. R. (2007). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9018-1.
  42. Yuen, S., & Yuen, P. (2008). Social networks in education. In G. Richards (Eds.), In Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 14081412). AACE.
  43. Zimmerman, B. S., Kruse, S. D., Niesz, T., Kist, W., Kidder-brown, M. K., & Nikbakht, E. (2020). Facebook me: The potential of student teachers’ online communities of practice in learning to teach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, ( c ) , 6 2 – 7 0 . h https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.2p.62.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic