Amidst the New Normal: Teachers’ Knowledge, Skills, and Attitude Towards the Implementation of Flexible Teaching and Learning
Reishan P Teruel | Darius Montano | Ritzie Mar Apaitan | Ruel Java
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This quantitative descriptive-correlational research aimed to describe teachers’ knowledge, skills, and attitude of the
Junior High School department at Lemery National High School (LNHS) on the implementation of flexible
teaching and learning. The dependent variable are teachers’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes. The independent
variables are the personal factors namely: age, civil status, number of years in the teaching profession, and
educational attainment. The study utilized the forty- three (43) in-service junior high school teachers of LNHS using
a researcher-made questionnaire. Based on the statistical findings of the study, the implementation of flexible
teaching and learning, the level of teachers’ knowledge when taken as a whole is “Above Average” (M= 4.18).
When grouped according to age, teachers who are 40 years old and above have a “High” result (M=4.22) as
compared with those teachers belonging to 20 to 39 years old. When grouped according to sex, male respondents
showed a “High” result (M=4.22) as compared with female respondents. When grouped according to number of
years in the teaching profession, whether coming from below 10 years and above 10 years, both categories showed
an “Above Average” result (M= 4.20 and M=4.15). Finally, when grouped according to position/rank, Master
Teachers showed a “High” result (M=4.50). When taken as a whole and when grouped according to age, sex,
number of years in the teaching profession, and positions/rank, the level teachers’ skills are “Very Good” (M=3.90).
In the implementation of flexible teaching and learning, the level of teacher’s attitude is “Positive” when taken as a
whole and when grouped according to age, sex, number of years in the teaching profession, and position/rank. There
is no significant difference in the level of teachers’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes as a whole and when classified
according to age, sex, number of years in the teaching, and position/rank towards the implementation of flexible
teaching and learning. Finally, there is a significant relationship in the level of teachers’ knowledge, skills, and
attitudes in the implementation of flexible teaching and learning.
References:
- Ali, W. (2020). Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic. High. Educ. Stud. 2020, 10, 16–25.
- Anwar, K.; Adnan, M. Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students perspectives. J. Pedagog. Res.2020, 1, 45–51.
- Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
- Avidov-Ungar, O. (2010). "Islands of innovation" or "Comprehensive innovation". Assimilating educational technology in teaching, learning, and management: A case study of school networks in Israel. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 259-280.
- Calamlam, J. M. (2016). Effectiveness of blended e-learning approach in a flipped classroom environment. The Asian Conference on Society, Education & Technology 2016 Official Conference Proceedings.
- Chilton, H., & McCracken, W. (2017). New technology, changing pedagogies? Exploring the concept of remote teaching placement supervision. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 116–130.
- Fabito, B. S., Trillanes, A. O., & Sarmiento, J. R. (2021). Barriers and challenges of computing students in an online learning environment: Insights from one private university in the Philippines. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 441- 458. doi: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.51
- Fraenkel, Jack R., et. al. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th Ed. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill.
- Gay, L. R., et. al. (2012). EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 10th Edition. Boston, Pearson Education.
- Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teacher's technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technologyintegration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
- Joan, R. (2013). Flexible Learning as New Learning Design in Classroom Process to Promote Quality Education Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 9lNo. 1l June – August 2013
- Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning Journal, 23(3), 97–119.
- Mulenga, E. M., & Marban, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the Gateway for Digital Learning in Mathematics Education?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269.
- Ozturk, D. S., Ozturk, F., & Ozen, R. (2018). The relationship between prospective teachers’ readiness and satisfaction about webbased distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 147–162.
- Phan, T. T. N., & Dang, L. T. T. (2017). Teacher Readiness forOnline Teaching: A Critical Review. International Journal Open Distance E-Learn. IJODeL, 3(1), 1–16.
- Rabacal, J. S. (2018). Blended Learning: Unveiling its potential in one ASEAN classroom setting. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 91–95.
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Hasanein, A.M.; Abu Elnasr, A.E. Responses to COVID-19 in Higher Education: Social Media Usage for Sustaining Formal Academic Communication in Developing Countries Sustainability 2020, 12, 6520.
- Suresh, M.; Priya, V.V.; Gayathri, R. E_ect of e-learning on academic performance of undergraduate students. Drug Invent. Today 2018, 10, 1797–1800.
- Ventayin, R. J. (2018). Teachers’ Readiness in Online Teaching Environment: A Case of Department of Education Teachers. Journal of Education, Management and Social Sciences, 2(1).