Philippine E-Journals

References:

1. Acebes, A. (2019). A qualitative evaluation on the implementation of Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy (ELLN) program. St. Mary’s College of Tagum Inc.
2. ActiTIME (2021). The importance of feedback. actiTIME Inc. https://www.actitime.com/project-management/importance-of-feedb ack
3. Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature 497, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a
4. Adnan, M. & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the covid-19 pandemic: students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and
5. Akinyode, B.F. & Khan, T.H. (2018). Step by step approach for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Built Environment a n d S u s t a i n a b i l i t y . h ttp s://www.researchg ate.n et/pub lication /32 8632 911
6. Afalla, B. & Fabelico, F. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical competence and teaching efficiency. Advance Scientific Research. I S S N - 2 3 9 4 - 5 1 2 5 V o l 7, I s s u e 1 1 , 2020. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.3183 8/jcr.07 .11 .36
7. Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(1), 45—52
8. Al Abikya, W. (2021). Lessons learned for teacher education: Challenges of teaching online classes during covid-19, what can preservice teachers tell us? Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica 2 0 2 1 , V o l . XXX, N ° 2 , 1 1 0 - 1 1 8 h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.2420 5/03 27 6716 .20 20.4011
9. Al-Abrrow, H., Sami, A., Abdullah, H., Khaw, K., Alnoor, A. & Rexhepi, G. (2021). Effect of open-mindedness and humble behavior on innovation: mediator role of learning. International J o u r n a l o f E m e r g i n g M a r k e t s . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1108 /IJOEM -08 -20 20 -0 888 .
10. Al-Ghamdi, A. (2017). Building a positive environment in classrooms through feedback and praise. English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p37
11. Al Zahrani, A. (2015). The place of technology integration in Saudi pre-service teacher education: Matching policy with practice. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14 (1) (151- 160).
12. Amankwaa, L. (2016). Creating protocols for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 23(3), 121-127.
13. Andrade, H. (2019). A critical review of research on student selfassessment. systematic review article. Sec. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
14. Aslam, R. & Khan, N. (2020). Constructive feedback and students' academic achievement: A theoretical framework. New Horizons, 1 4 ( 2 ) , 1 7 5 . https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/constructive-feedbackstudents-academic/docview/2474525180/se-2?accountid=31259
15. Balaza, E., Cruz, H., Ferraren, J., Cañares, G. & Avila, J. (2021). Embracing the challenges of online learning, keeping the passion for teaching burning: from the lens of private school teachers. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33964.18561
16. Barnesa, R., Hall, R., Lower, V., Pottinger, C. & Popham, A. (2020). Lessons from an online teacher preparation program: Flexing work experience to meet student needs and regulators’ requirements in the United States. Journal of Education for Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802203.
17. Belmont Report (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The National Commission. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1266277
18. Biber, D., Melton, B., & Czech, D. (2020). The impact of COVID19 on college anxiety, optimism, gratitude, and course satisfaction. Journal of American College Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1842424
19. Boakye, C., & Ampiah, J. (2017). Challenges and solutions: The experiences of newly qualified Science teachers. Sage Open 10, (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017706710.
20. Bossér, U. & Lindahl, M. (2020). Students’ use of open-minded attitude and elaborate talk in group discussion and role-playing debate on socio-scientific issues. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, S c i e n c e a n d T e c h n o l o g y E d u c a t i o n . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.2933 3/ejmste/9127 .
21. Braun, B. & Clarke, V. (2014). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning.
22. Burns, A., Danyluk, P., Kapoyannis, T. & Kendrick, A. (2020). Leading the pandemic practicum: one teacher education response to the covid-19 crisis. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance. ISSN: 2292-8588 Volume 35, No. 2, 2020. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1173
23. Caceres, D. (2015). Perceived roles of cooperating teachers in student teachers’ information: Input to policymaking.
24. Charbonneau-Gowdy, P. & Cechova, I. (2020). Zoom-ing out: The impact of international online practicum opportunities on pre-service teachers' development. Proceedings of the 19th European conference on e-learning. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/EEL.20.069
25. Chiu, T.K.F., Lin, TJ. & Lonka, K. (2021). Motivating online learning: The challenges of covid-19 and beyond. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 30, 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00566-w
26. Clarin, A. S., & Baluyos, E. L. (2022). Challenges encountered in the implementation of online distance learning. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(1), 33-46 . https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline591
27. Cobilla, L. E. S. (2014). Student teaching mentor’s role: a perspective from university student teachers. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development, 2 (0), 180-18
28. Coman, C., Țîru, L., Mesesan, S., Stanciu, C. & Bularca, M. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: students’ perspective sustainability. https://doi.org/12.10367.10.3390/su122410367
29. Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative r e s e a r c h . M e d S u r g N u r s i n g , 2 5 ( 6 ) , 435+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A476729520/AONE?u=phsmc t&sid=googleScholar&xid=8a55dd1d
30. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design-qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Fourth Edition. University of Nebraska-London. SAGE Publication Inc.
31. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Creswell, J. W. & Plano, C. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2011.
33. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/026197 68.2017.1315399
34. DeJonckheere, M. & Vaughn, L. (2019). Semi structured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour.
35. Demerath, P., Kemper, S., Yousuf, E. & Banwo, B. (2022). A grounded model of how educators earn students’ trust in a high perfo rming U.S. urban high school. Urban Rev. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1007 /s112 56 -022 -0063 5 -4
36. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of covid19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
37. Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ramot, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges: Teacher education in Israel in the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 586–595 . https://doi.org/10.1080/026 07476.2020.1799708
38. Dowding, D., Merrill, J. & Russell, D. (2018). Using feedback intervention theory to guide clinical dashboard design. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371234/Online Publication Date: June 5, 2018
39. Drew, P. (2016). Evaluating teacher education programs through performance-based assessments. IGI Global.
40. D’Emidio-Caston, M. (2019). Addressing social, emotional development, and resilience at the heart of teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly: San Francisco, 46(4), 116-149. http://search.proquest.com/docview/2304942790/abstract/DA9D3F A7F6324C38PQ/1
41. Ellis, N. & Loughland, T. (2017). ‘Where to next?’ Examining feedback received by teacher education students.13.
42. Elshareif, E. & Mohamed, E. (2021). The effects of e-learning on students’ motivation to learn in higher education. Online Learning, 25(3), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2336
43. Ersin, P., Atay, D., & Mede, E. (2020). Boosting preservice teachers’ competence and online teaching readiness through the practicum during the covid-19 outbreak. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 112-124.
44. Eurich, T. (2018). The right way to respond to negative feedback. H a r v a r d B u s i n e s s R e v i e w . https://hbr.org/2018/05/the-right-way-to-respond-to-negative-feedba ck
45. Evagorou, M., & Nisiforou, E. (2020). Engaging pre-service teachers in an online STEM fair during covid-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 179-186.
46. Faikhamta, C. & Clarke, A. (2018). Thai cooperating teachers’ motivations and challenges in supervising student teachers during their internship program. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.018
47. Fedynich, L., Bradley, K. S., & Bradley, J. (2015). Graduate students’ perceptions of online learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27.
48. Ferrer, J. (2022). Problems met in lesson planning by the pre-service teachers. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i2.10419.
49. Flores, M. A., & Gago, M. (2020). Teacher education in times of covid-19 pandemic in Portugal: National, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 507–516. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709
50. Frey, B. (2018). Feedback intervention theory. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n261
51. Friedrich, L. (2014). New literacies integration by student teacher/cooperating teacher dyads in elementary schools: a collective case study, 276.
52. Gabatbat, M. E. & Santander, N. (2021). The value of values education in the virtual classroom. San Beda University. Bedan Research Journal. Vol. 6, 2021, p. 31-55
53. Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The Challenges of Online Learning: Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner. Journal of Learning Design. https://doi.org/10.20.10.5204/jld.v9i3.293.
54. Godfrey, H. & Erduran, S. (2021). Argumentation and intellectual humility: a theoretical synthesis and an empirical study about students’ warrants. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.2006622
55. Gnepp J., Klayman J., Williamson, I., & Barlas, S. (2020). The future of feedback: motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0234444. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234444
56. Greathouse, P., Eisenbach, B. B., & Kaywell, J. F. (2019). Preparing teacher candidates to be “effective” in the classroom: lessons learned from national teachers of the year. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1561405.
57. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, pp. 105-117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Gustiani, S. (2020). Students’ motivation in online learning during covid-19 pandemic era: A case study. Holistics Journal Hospitality a n d
59. Hardavella G., Aamli-Gaagnat A., Saad N., Rousalova, I. & Sreter, K. (2017). How to give and receive feedback effectively. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.009917
60. Harper, W. (2020). The art of delivering inspirational feedback. T r i u m I Q . https://www.triumgroup.com/how-to-give-inspiring-feedback-especi ally-when-its-a-difficult-message/
61. Hascher, T. & Hagenauer, G. (2016). Openness to theory and its importance for pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy, emotions, and classroom behavior in the teaching practicum. International Journal of Educational Research.
62. Heath, M. K., & Segal. P. (2021). The trap of techno centrism: Recentering pedagogy for emergency remote teaching. Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the covid-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/
63. Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. (2019). Saturation in qualitative research. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, & R.A. W i l l i a m s ( E d s . ) , S A G E R e s e a r c h M e t h o d s Foundations. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036822322
64. Humber, J. (2018). Student engagement in online courses: a grounded theory case study. The University of Alabama. http://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/3707
65. Hwa, Y., Kaffenberger, M. & Silberstein, J. 2020. Aligning levels of instruction with goals and the needs of students (ALIGNS): Varied approaches, common principles. RISE Insight Series. 2020/022. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-RI_2020/022
66. Istiqomah, E. & Prastuti, E. (2020). Student optimism regarding online learning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Conference of Psychology, KnE Social Sciences, pages 187–194. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i15.8204
67. Javier, N. (2021). The plight of parents with kindergarten learners in a new normal: a narratology. St. Mary’s College of Tagum Inc.
68. Jensen, J., Bearman, M. & Boud, D. (2021). Understanding feedback in online learning – a critical review and metaphor analysis. C o m p u t e r E d u c a t i o n 1 7 3 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1016 /j.co mp edu .20 21.1042 71
69. Kadir, F. A. & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Teaching Practicum during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1175–1183. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i4/9646
70. Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2001). Transformations in language and learning: perspectives on multiliteracies. Melbourne: Common Ground. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2304/elea.2004.1.1.7
71. Kalloo, R. C., Mitchell, B., & Kamalodeen, V. J. (2020). Responding to the covid-19 pandemic in Trini- dad and Tobago: Challenges and opportunities for teacher education. Journal of E d u c a t i o n fo r T e a c h i n g , 4 6 ( 4 ) , 452 – 4 6 2 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1080 /026 07 47 6.2020.1800407
72. Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). The covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: how teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976 8.2020.1820480
73. Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid-19: Experiences of pre-service teachers in an early childhood education practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145- 158.
74. kindall, H., Crowe, T. & Elsass, A. (2017). Mentoring pre-service educators in the development of professional disposition. International Journal of mentoring and Coaching in Education; B i n g l e y , 6 ( 3 ) , 1 9 6 - 2 0 9 . h ttp ://dx .do i.o rg/10.1108 /IJM CE -03 -20 17 -0 022
75. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological B u l l e t i n , 1 1 9 ( 2 ) , 2 5 4 – 2 8 4 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1037 /003 3 -2 909 .119 .2 .25 4
76. Kneppe, J. (2018). Early childhood education students' perceptions of community college online practicum experiences from a competency-based education perspective (Order No. 10973152). P r o Q u e s t C e n t r a l . ( 2 2 7 8 1 0 4 6 4 5 ) . https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/early-childhood-educ a t i o n - s t u d e n t s - perceptions/docview/2278104645/se-2?accountid=31259
77. Koç, E. (2016). View of a critical look at a bended English language teacher education program with an emphasis on the practicum. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. http://www.irrodl.or/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2286/3799
78. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during covid-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650.
79. Korstjens, I. & Moser, A. (2018). Practical guidance to qualitative research. Series practical guidance to qualitative research part 4 trustworthiness and publishing.pdf
80. Korthagen, F. & Evelein, F. (2016). Relations between student teachers' basic needs fulfillment and their teaching behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 60, pp. 234-244. ISSN 0742-051X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.021.
81. Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2009) InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd Edition, Sage, London. S c i e n t i f i c R e s e a r c h A c a d e m i c P a p e r . https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/Ref erencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1977777
82. LaTour, K. & Noel, H. (2021). Self-directed learning online: An opportunity to binge. Journal of Marketing Education. 43. 027347532098729. https://doi. org/10.1177/0273475320987295.
83. La Velle, L., Newman, S., Montgomery, C., & Hyatt, D. (2020). Initial teacher education in England and the Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1- 13
84. Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324-327
85. Li, C. & Lalani, F. (2020). The covid-19 pandemic has changed e d u c a t i o n f o r e v e r . T h i s i s h o w . https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-educationglo bal-covid19-online-digital-learning
86. Lichtman, M. (2010). Understanding and evaluating qualitative educational research. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/Ref erencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2594540
87. Lilienthal, L. K., Potthoff, D., & Anderson, K. E. (2017). The development of an online, graduate practicum course. Delta Kappa G a m m a B u l l e t i n , 8 4 ( 1 ) , 4 2 - 5 2 . https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/development-online-gr a d u a t e - p r a c t i c u m - cou rse/do cv iew/194 2157 489 /se -2?accou ntid=3 1259
88. Lincoln, Y.S. (2013). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication
89. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (2000). The only generalization is: there is no generalization. Case Study Method, 27-44.
90. Liu, S.H. (2012). A multivariate model of factors influencing technology use by preservice teachers during practice teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), 137– 149.
91. Lu, D. (2021). EFL teachers’ optimism and commitment and their contribution to students’ academic success. Frontiers in Psychology 12:752759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752759
92. Mayadas, F. (2019). Asynchronous learning networks: a slogan f o u n d a t i o n p e r s p e c t i v e . o n l i n e le a r n 1 (1 ) . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.2405 9/o lj. v1i1.1941.
93. McGraw, A. & Davis, R. (2017). Mentoring for pre-service teachers and the use of inquiry-oriented feedback. International Journal of M e n t o r i n g a n d C o a c h i n g in E d u c a t i o n . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1108 /IJMCE-03 -2016 -002 3
94. Meşe, E. & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4 (1), 11-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetol/issue/60134/817680
95. Mishra, L. (2016). Focus group discussion in qualitative research. Department of Education, Mizoram University, Aizawl, Mizoram, I n d i a . T e c h n o L E A R N V o l . 6 : N o . 1 . h ttp s://ndp ublisher.in/ad min /issu es/tlV6 N1a.pd f
96. Moroe, L. E., Mendez, L., & Nutta, J. (2020). Virtually re- mote: How interrupted internships continued in a virtual classroom. Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the covid-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www. learntechlib.org/p/216903/
97. Moyo, N. (2020). Covid-19 and the future of practicum in teacher education in Zimbabwe: Rethinking the ‘new normal’ in quality assurance for teacher certification. Journal of Education for T e a c h i n g , 4 6 ( 4 ) , 5 3 6 – 5 4 5 . h ttp s:/d oi.o rg /10 .10 80/0260 74 76.2020 .18 0270 2
98. Msangya, B., Mkoma, S., & Yihuan, W. (2016). Teaching practice experience for undergraduate student teachers: a case study of the department of education at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania. Journal of Education and Practice, 6.
99. Nambisan, P. (2017). An introduction to ethical, safety and intellectual property rights issues in biotechnology. Cochin University of Science & Technology, Cochin, Kerala, India. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128092316/an-introductio n-to-ethical-safety-and-intellectual-property-rights-issues-inbiotechnology
100. National Ethical Guidelines (2017). National ethical guidelines for health and health-related research 2017 new version. Department of Science and Technology - Philippine Council for Health Research and D e v el o p m e n t . ISBN 978 - 971 - 8662 - 3 3 - 5 . http://49.231.15.21/deptw13/upload/files/hercF25631204172102278 1.pdf
101. National Institutes of Health (2016). Guiding principles for ethical research and pursuing potential research participants protections. National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, M a r y l a n d 2 0 8 9 2 . https://www.nih.gov/health-information/nih-clinical-research-trialsyou/guiding-principles-ethical-research
102. Nauman, A. A., & Munawar, S. M. (2020). Evaluating pre-service teaching practice for online and distance education students in Pakistan: Evaluation of teaching practice. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 81-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4606
103. Nel, C., & Marais, E. (2020). Preservice teachers use of WhatsApp to explain subject content to school children during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Work- Integrated Learning, 21(5), 629.
104. Ogretim, C., Ogretmenlerin, U., and Mudahalesi, O. (2021). The intervention of online teaching practicum to teachers’ sense of selfefficacy. Faculty of Education, Tishk International University, Erbil/Iraq. Celik, S. / Volume 10-Issue 37: 190-201. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.37.01.19
105. Osman, M. E. (2020). Global impact of COVID-19 on education systems: the emergency remote teaching at Sultan Qaboos University. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1-9.
106. Özkanal, Ü., Yüksel, I., & Uysal, B. (2020). The pre-service teachers’ reflection-on-action during distance practicum: a critical view on eba tv English courses. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(4), 1347-1364.
107. Parkinson, G. & Drislane, R. (2011). Qualitative research. In online dictionary of the social sciences. http://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl
108. Pieters, F. & Agustina, A. (2021). The role of family social support on learning motivation: a study on high school students. Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education a n d H u m a n i t i e s R e s e a r c h , v o l u m e 5 7 0 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.2991 /assehr.k .210 805 .183
109. Pinar E., Atay, D., & Mede, E. (2020). Boosting preservice teachers’ competence and online teaching readiness through e-practicum during the covid-19 outbreak. International Journal of TESOL S t u d i e s ( 2 0 2 0 ) , V o l . 2 ( 2 ) 1 1 2 - 1 2 4 h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.4645 1/ijts.2 020 .09 .09
110. Podany, A. (2017). Ethical Considerations in pediatric research.
111. Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
112. Pope, R. (2020). How Are Supports for Diverse Learners Shifting in Distance Learning? The In ternational Educator. https://www.tieonline.com/article/2819/how-are-supports-for-divers e-learners-shifting-in-distance-learning
113. Postholm, B. M. & Skrovset S. (2013). The researcher reflecting on her own role during action research. Educational Action Research, 21:4, 506-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.833798
114. Powoh, V. (2016). Research methods-quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. (PDF) research methods-quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods
115. Redmond, P. (2015). Discipline specific online mentoring for secondary pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 90, 95-104
116. Republic Act 10173 (2016). Data privacy act of 2012. National Privacy Commission. https://ww.privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/
117. Research Integrity (2021). Ethical foundation-the Belmont report. U n i v e r s i t y o f N e v a d a , R e n o . https://www.unr.edu/research-integrity/human-research/human-resea rch-protection-policy-manual/50-ethical-foundation-the-belmontreport
118. Rezk, Y. (2021). Promoting students’ learning through constructive f e e d b a c k s t r a t e g i e s . https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:bz60w834v/fullt ext.pdf
119. Rivera, D. (2016). Working with student teachers: a mixed-methods study to examine the roles and self-identified dispositions of cooperating teachers. University of Maryland, College Park. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1799101121/abstract/361129E 37D9E4D44PQ/3
120. Robinson, M., & Rusznyak, L. (2020). Learning to teach without school-based experience: conundrums and possibilities in a South African context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1-11.
121. Roddy, C., Amiet, D., Chung, J., Holt, C., Shaw, L., McKenzie, S., Garivaldis, F., Lodge, J. & Mundy, M. (2017). Applying best practice online learning, teaching, and support to intensive online e n v i r o n m e n t s : an i n t e g r a t i v e r e v i e w . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.3389 /feduc.201 7.0 0059
122. Samonte, K. & De Guzman, P. (2018). Predictors of internship performance among graduating teacher education of Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology. JPAIR Institutional Research Journal, 11(1). http://ejournals.ph/form/cite.php?id=13841
123. Sasaki, R., Goff, W., Dowsett, A., Parossien, D., Matthies, J., Di Lorio, C., Montey, S., Rowe, S., & Puddy, G. (2020). The practicum experience during covid-19--supporting initial teacher education student's practicum experience through a simulated classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 329-339.
124. Sepulveda-Escobar, P. & Morrison, A. (2020). Online teaching placement during the COVID- 19 pandemic in Chile: challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 587- 607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.202 0.1820981
125. Serin, H. (2017). The role of passion in learning and teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(1), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i1p60
126. Sethusa, M. J. (2020). Exploring Teaching Practice Supervisors’ experiences Of Student Support In An Open, Distance And ELearning Institution. e-Bangi, 17(8).
127. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63- 75.
128. Shneyder, L. & Feoktistova, S. & Vasilyeva, N., Golovyatenko, T. & Usoltseva, E. (2021). Creative self-fulfillment and goal commitment of teachers at the stage of entering the profession. SHS W e b o f C o n f e r e n c e s . https://doi.org/117.05002.10.1051/shsconf/202111705002
129. Schou, L, Hostrup, H., Lyngso, E.E., Larsen, S., & Poulsen, I. (2011). Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative articles. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 68(9), 2086-2094.
130. Simon, C. (2011). Ethics and identity in global health research. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2011.0 0297.x
131. Spanorriga, C., Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2018). E-mentoring and novice teachers’ professional development: Program design and critical success factors. In T. Bastiaens, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
132. Sulisworo, D., Drusmin, R., Kusumaningtyas, D., Handayani, T., Wahyuningsih, W., Jufriansah, A., Khusnani, A. & Prasetyo, E. (2021). The Science Teachers’ Optimism Response to the Use of Marker-Based Augmented Reality in the Global Warming Issue. E d u c a t i o n R e s e a r c h I n t e r n a t i o n a l . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1155 /202 1/7 2642 30.
133. Sun, W., Hong, JC., & Dong, Y. (2022). Self-directed learning predicts online learning engagement in higher education mediated by perceived value of knowing learning goals. Asia-Pacific Edu Res (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00653-6
134. Superales, S. (2020). The influence of mentoring practices of cooperating teachers on the level of teaching performance of the elementary pre-service teachers. A thesis to the graduate education faculty. St. Mary’s College of Tagum Inc.
135. The Olinger Group (2021). One-on-one, in-depth interviews. New O r l e a n s , U n i t e d S t a t e s . https://www.olingergroup.com/services/methods/one-one-depth-inte rviews/
136. Tobin, G.A & Begley, C.M. (2004). Methodological rigor within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48 (4), 388- 396.
137. Townsend, E. et al. (2010). Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions relevant for young offenders with mood disorders, anxiety disorders, or self-harm. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.015
138. Trochim, W. (2016). Qualitative Validity. Qualitative Validity. Research Methods Knowledge Base
139. Tseng, J. J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2020). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted L a n g u a g e L e a r n i n g . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1080 /095 88 221 .202 0.1 8685 31
140. Tsui, A., Carol, K., Harfitt, G. & Leung, P. (2020). Crisis and opportunity in teacher preparation in the pandemic: exploring the“adjacent possible”. Journal of Professional Capital and Community Vol. 5 No. 3/4, 2020 pp. 237-245. Emerald Publishing Limited 2056-9548. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-07-2020-0061
141. Unal, E., Yamac, A., & Uzun, A. M. (2017). The effect of the teaching practice course on pre-service elementary teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy. Malaysian Online Journal of E d u c a t i o n a l T e c h n o l o g y , 5 ( 3 ) , 3 9 – 53. h ttp s://eric.ed .g ov/?id =EJ1150 409
142. UNESCO (2020). Education: from school closure to recovery. https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response
143. Uribe, S. N., & Vaughan, M. (2017). Facilitating student learning in distance education: A case study on the development and implementation of a multifaceted feedback system. Distance E d u c a t i o n , 3 8 ( 3 ) , 2 8 8 – 3 0 1 . h ttp s:/d oi.o rg /10 .10 80/0158 79 19.2017 .13 6900 5
144. Vaismoradi M., Jones, J., Turunen, H. & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290552438
145. Valdez, P., Ugalingan, G., & Edjan, D. (2021). Correspondence exploring conditions of possibility for the teaching internship in the Philippines during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Health, pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab225
146. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structures methods. Sage Publication
147. Wu, B., Peng, X. & Hu, Y. (2021). How to foster pre-serviceteachers’ STEM learning design expertise through virtual internship: design-based research. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 3307–3329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10063-y
148. Yahya, S. A., Mansor, R., & Abdullah, M. H. (2017). Analysis of teaching practice assessment methods for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social S c i e n c e s , 7 ( 3 ) , 8 9 0 – 9 0 3 . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.6007 /IJARBSS/v7 -i3 /295 7
149. Yang, M., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. (2021). Feedback experience of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: voices from preservice English language teachers. Asia-Pacific Edu R e s 3 0 , 6 1 1 – 6 2 0 ( 2 0 2 1 ) . h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.1007 /s402 99 -021 -0061 8 -1
150. Zhao, H. & Zhang, X. (2017). The influence of field teaching practice on pre-service teachers’ professional identity: A mixed m e t h o d s s t u d y . F r o n t i e r s in P s y c h o l o g y , 8. h ttp s://do i.o rg/1 0.3389 /fp syg.201 7.0 1264
151. Zhu, G., Mena, J, and Johnson, C. (2020). Chinese student teachers’ teaching practicum experiences: insights from transformative learning, third space, and dialogical-self theory. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol 103, 101638.
152. Zimmerman, W. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2016). Online learning self-efficacy in students with and without online learning experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180– 191.