Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 10 no. 4 (2023)

Self-Efficacy, Self-Management and Performance of Teachers on the New Normal

Loni Daria

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Self-Efficacy, Self-Management and Performance are factors that contribute a lot to the teaching and learning process. The way teachers’ believe in their one’s capabilities and how they manage themselves will impact their personal and professional skills. Their performance will bring out the full potential of their students. The main objective of this study was to determine the level of Self-Efficacy in terms of Home-Related Task and School Related Task, Self-Management in terms of Priority Setting, Self-Care and Role Clarity and Performance of teachers in the new normal in terms of 5 Key Results Area (KRA). The descriptive correlational type of research, specifically the survey technique using quantitative method was used in the study. Further, this descriptive study was conducted to determine the level of self-efficacy, the level of self-management and performance of the teachers in the New Normal in the District of Maayon for the School year 2021-2022. This study involved 32 elementary school taken as population and 160 randomly selected Elementary Teachers in the District of Maayon. A researcher-modified from Damianus Abun (2021) survey questionnaire was made in gathering data. The study was limited to the level of Self-Efficacy, Self-Management and Performance of Teachers in the New Normal. The independent variable consists of the level of Self-Efficacy in terms of Home Related Task and School Related Task and Self-Management of Teachers in the New Normal in terms of Priority Setting, Self Care and Role Clarity while the dependent variable consist of the Performance of Teachers in the New Normal in terms of 5 Key Result Area (1) Content Knowledge and Pedagogy (2) Learning Environment (3) Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning & Assessment and Reporting (4) Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional Development and (5) Plus Factor. The statistical tools utilized in this study were frequency count, percentage mean, and Standard Deviation. While inferential data were processed using Pearson r Correlation. The results of this study reveals that the level of Self-Efficacy of teachers in the new normal in terms of Home Related and School Related tasks was manifested as “High”. The level of Self-Management of teachers in the new normal in terms of Priority Setting, Self-Care, and Role Clarity was rated as “High” The performance of teachers in terms of 5 Key Results Area (KRA) 1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy 2. Learning Environment 3. Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning & Assessment, and Reporting 4. Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional Development and 5. Plus Factor in the new normal as a whole was manifested as “High”. Lastly, there was a significant relationship noted in the level of Self-Efficacy and level of Self-Management of Teachers in the New Normal. The level of Self-Efficacy and level of Self-Management were found significantly related but not to the level of performance of teachers in the new normal.



References:

  1. Alata, E. J.P.et.al. (2018). Understanding the self, Rex Bookstore, Inc. (RBSI), 856 Nicanor Reyes Sr. St.,Sampaloc, Manila.
  2. Anif, S, Sutama, and H.J Prayitno. 2019. “Effectiveness of Pedagogical Competence: A Development Model through Association of Biology Teachers’ Forum.” 8(1): 22–31.
  3. Amalu, M. N. (2016). Motivating Staff towards effective teaching in primary school in Cross River State. International Journal of Research in Basic and Life Long Education, 5(1), 130-138.
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
  5. Been, Sherry Lynn Dallis. 2012. “The Early Childhood Teacher: Navigating Professional    Identities during a Time of Increased Accountability.”Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53(9): 1689–99.
  6. Berns, R.M. 2004. Child, Family, School and Community. 6th ed. Wards worth Thomson.
  7. Blay, B. E. (2013). Elementary Statistics. Revised Edition. ANVL PUBLISHING, INC.
  8. Burroughs, N, J Gardner, and Y Lee. 2019. “A Review of the Literature on Teacher.” Teaching for Exelence and Equity (2007): 7–17.
  9. Cacho, Hermanos, Building, Pines Car. Union Streets, Mandaluyong Citty, 1550 Philippines.
  10. Caras, M. S.et.al. (2009). Statistics and Probability, A simplified Approach. National Bookstore, Quad Alpha Centrum Bldg., 125 Pioneer Street, Mandaluyong City.
  11. Chen, Y. C. M, Wang Yung Shui, and Vicky Sun. 2012. “Intellectual Capital and Organizational Commitment: Evidence from Cultural Creative Industries in Taiwan.” Personnel Review 41(3): 321–39.
  12. Collins III, J. W. & O’Brien, N.P. (2011).  The Greenwood Dictionary of Education. Second Edition. 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911.
  13. Cox, J. (2017). Professional Commitment in the Teaching Profession, https://www.Teachub.com/professional-development/2017/11/professional-commitment-in-theTeaching-ProfessionCommitted.
  14. Dalanan, J. (2017) Filipino Teachers Sense of Efficacy in Inclusion Classses Vol: 1, Issue LVIII, December 2017.
  15. Dalighan & Owen (2021) Teacher Efficacy for Online Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic
  16. A Journal of Educational Research and Practice 2021 Vol. 30 (1) 95-116 https://journal.library.Brocku.ca/brocked.
  17. David, A.S. (2017). Self-Management in the Teaching Profession.
  18. De Guzman, E. 2000. “Evolving and Testing of a Faculty Performance Evaluation Model.” Siyasik 7(1): 1–26.
  19. Digan, A. (2020). The New Normal Teachers. Journal Online.
  20. Dizon, R.Y. (2016). Nursing and Pregnant Teachers and their Performance: A basis for gender and development advocacy program, Master’s Thesis: Pampanga State Agricultural University.
  21. Ercoskun, M. (2016) Adaptation of Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A study on Reliability and Validity.
  22. Europass Teacher Academy SRL (2020-2022)
  23. Field, S. (2017) Evaluating the Effects of Self-Management Program with a Evaluating the Effects of a Self-Management Program with a Peer-        Mediated Praise Procedure.
  24. Foster, B, and K. R Seeker. 2001. Pembinaan Untuk Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan.[Coaching for Employee Performance Improvement]. PPM.
  25. Glemer, M.L. (2021) Readiness and Commitment among Teachers in the New Normal.
  26. Guzman, R. L. De, Rn, J., & Guy, I.A. (2013). Teacher’s Time Management and Student’ Academic Achievement in LPU College of Nursing: Basis for an Enhanced Classroom Management, 2011-2012.
  27. Hassan, S. & Abdullahi, S. (2013). The impact of teacher’s age, gender and experience on the use of ICT in EFL teaching. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 57-67. Irvine, J. (2018). Relationship between teaching experience and teacher effectiveness: Implications for Policy decisions. Journal of             Instructional Pedagogies, 22, 1-19
  28. Islahi, F. & Nasreen, D. (2013). Who make effective teachers, men or women? An Indian perspective. Universal Journal of Educational research, 1 (4): 285-           293.
  29. Jump, L. (2011). The experiences of University Lectures when enhancing their Teaching Through the use of digital technology: a systematic review, Higher Education School of Health and Social Care, 8.
  30. Kalita, A. (2012). A study on managing effectiveness of secondary school teachers in Guwahati City India. The Clarion, 1(2), 238-241. Karen, C. (2018). Sex and gender. What is the difference? Brighton UK: Health line Media. Retrieved from http:/sciabe.us/gkbzu on the 6th May, 2020.
  31. Kanto, Sanggar, Darsono Wisadirana, Anif Fatma Chawa, and M. Chairul Basrun Umanailo.2020. “Change in Community Work Patterns.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management 0(March): 2496–2502.
  32. Kaur, S. (2019) Role of teachers in the Student Learning Process. International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBM) ISSN (Online): 2319-8028,    ISSN     (Print); 2319-801X www.ijbmi.org Volume 8 Issue 12 ver. December 2019 pp.41-45.
  33. Klassen, R. M., and M. M Chiu. 2010. “. Effects on Teachers‟ Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Teacher Gender, Years of Experience, and Job Stress.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102(3): 741.
  34. Lee, C. (2020). Preparing Teachers for the New Normal.
  35. Lualhati, G, P, (2019). Time Management Practices of Educators in a State University: Views and Implications (4), 222-227.
  36. Manabat, I.M. (2016) Teachers Attitude and Efficiency on the Learner Information System, Master’s Thesis: Pampanga State University.
  37. Marcus Buckingham, The One Thing You Need to Know: About Great Managing, Great Leading, and Sustained Individual Success (New York: Free Press, 2005).
  38. Miller, A. (2016) Tools for Student Self-Management. Edutopia. Transforming Education. Self- Management Toolkit.
  39. Mohsin, M. (2021). 10 Facebook Statistics Every Marketer should know in 2021.
  40. Mitchell, M. (2019) Teacher Self-Efficacy and Classroom Management.
  41. Olenyxa (2014). Self-Management. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/olenyxa/sel- 40313340
  42. Phajane, Masello Hellen. 2014. “Exploring the Roles and Responsibilities of Early Childhood Teachers.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5(10   SPEC. ISSUE): 420–24.
  43. Paragsa, J.M., (2014). School Principals Transformational Leadership Behaviors and their relationship to Master Teachers Teaching Efficacy, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment, Master’s Thesis, Philippine Christian University.
  44. Podolsky, A., Kini, T & Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness: A review of US research. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. Doi.10.1108/JPcc-12- 2018-0032.
  45. Rakib, Muhammad, Arfina Rombe, and Muchtar Yunus. 2017. “PENGARUH PELATIHAN DAN PENGALAMAN MENGAJAR TERHADAP PROFESIONALITAS GURU (Studi Pada Guru IPS Terpadu Yang Memiliki Latar Belakang Pendidikan Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Ekonomi).” Jurnal Ad’ministrare 3(2): 137.
  46. Redmond, B. F. (2010). Self-Efficacy Theory: Do I think that I can succeed in my work? Work Attitudes and Motivation. The Pennsylvania: State       University, World Campus.
  47. Rice, Jennifer King. 2010. “The Impact of Teacher Experience Examining the Evidence and Policy Implications.” CALDER working paper (August): 1–8.
  48. Shah, S. & Udgaonkar, U. (2018). Influence of gender and age of teachers on teaching effectiveness: Students perspectives. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 2436-2441.
  49. Samujto, M. A. (2017). Time Management for Teachers. Lubelski Rocenik.Pedagogiczny. https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2016.35.3.295
  50. Sherman, D. A., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks hearten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26(9),1046–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611003.
  51. Skaalvik, E. M., and S. Skaalvik. 2014. “Teacher Self-Efficacy and Perceived Autonomy: Relations with Teacher Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Emotional Exhaustion.”
  52. Psychological Reports 114(1): 68–77. Strategies for Children. 2010. Strategies for Improving the Early Education and Care Workforce in Massachusetts.
  53. Whitebook, Marcy. 2014. Building a Skilled Teacher Workforce. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
  54. Wyman, O. (2020). Education in the New Normal: Education Leadership Response to Covid-19.
  55. Shoughnessy, J.J.,et.al. (2012). Research Methods in Pyschology. Ninth Edition, McGraw-Hill, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020.
  56. Soumya, M. & Nair, R. (2016). Teaching effectiveness of prospective teachers in relation to gender and locale. Review of Researcher, 7(9), 1-3.
  57. Sivasakthi, R. Muthumanickam, R (2012). A study of teacher effectiveness of school teachers. International Journal of Current Research, 4(2), 222-226.
  58. Stuhlman, M. W., and R. C. Pianta. 2009. “Profiles of Educational Quality in First  Grade.” The Elementary School Journal 109(4): 323–42.
  59. Sujiono, Y.N. 2009. Konsep Dasar Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Indeks. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2018. How Are School Performance and School Climate Related to Teachers’ Experience? OECD Publishing.
  60. Toma R. Daniel (1992) Self‐management theory for developing teacher effectiveness: A new pedagogic approach to teacher effectiveness.
  61. Teaching Agency, (2012), Improving Teacher Training for behavior. Retrieved from https://www.gov.com
  62. Viscarra, F.O. (2003). Introduction to Educational research. Great Books Trading, 27 Masikap St., Brgy. Pinyahan, Sikatuna Village, Quezon City.
  63. Yaka, A.I. (2011). The relationship between adult attachment styles, early maladaptive schemas, self-regulatory and psychological symptoms (Master’s thesis, Ankara University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara, Turkey).
  64. Yang, D. J., Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. C. (2016). Would message framing facilitate long-term behavioral change in patients with chronic pain? International Journal of jbh Applied, 6(2) Retrieve from http://www.ijastnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_2_June_2016/8.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic