HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 12 no. 9 (2023)

Remote Delivery of Related Learning Experiences for Medical Technology: Cases of Teachers and Students in Three (3) Higher Education Institutions

Hazel Carbon-Granil | Wilter C Friales

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Related Learning Experience (RLE) provides opportunity for medical technology students and interns to practice what has been learned in the classroom obtained from laboratory classes in schools, clinical laboratories and hospitals designed to advance the diagnostic competencies of students in the performance of clinical laboratory procedures. This study aimed to describe the remote delivery of the Related Learning Experiences (RLE) during the COVID19 pandemic for Medical Technology as experienced by both the teachers and students in the 3 identified Higher Education Institutions. This study utilized Qualitative Case Study Design- Multiple case embedded approach. The participants of the study were the medical technology teachers handling RLE subjects and medical technology students from the three Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) who were enrolled in Bachelor of Science in Medical Technology program. The findings revealed that both teachers and students prepare for their remote teaching and learning in RLE, and apply various strategies to teach and learn. Teachers’ give assessments to students through computer software-aided assessments such as quizzes and exams, there are also online submissions required like recorded and live return demonstrations. Challenges were identified by teachers and students and coping strategies were also employed. Based on the findings, cases of teachers and students attending to remote delivery of RLE are affected with schools’ sufficiency or adequacy in instructional facilities like the laboratory, learning management system and laboratory manuals. Clarity of guidelines and timely feed backing can significantly and positively affect the institution’s teaching process in the remote delivery. It can be also noted that medical technology learner’s performance and attitude towards learning is relatively better compared with in-person approach. As shared, they also exert effort and somehow are motivated to learn and take part on their self-learning paces because they can see their teachers’ effort in teaching.



References:

  1. Ascough, R. (2002), Designing for online distance education: Putting pedagogy before technology.
  2. Barjesteh, H., Manoocherhzadeh, M., Heidarzadi, M. (2022). Syllabus design and materials development, Society publishing, Canada
  3. Becker, L., Denicolo, P., (2013). Teaching in higher education. SAGE publications, London Colindres,
  4. J. , Acosta, C. R., Salinas, R. ,  & Ultado, M. C.(2019). Correlation between lecture grades and related learning experience (RLE): Revisiting standards of nursing. Acta Medica Philippina, 1(1), 15
  5. Creswell, J. (2018), Research design, Sage Publications, California
  6. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A Panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis, Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  7. Fatani, T.H. (2020). Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemicBMC Med Educ 20, 396, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2
  8. Garrison, D. R. (2017), E-Learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework  for research and practice, 3rd Ed., London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
  9. Gottlieb, M., (2022), Assessment in multiple languages a handbook forschool and district leaders,  Corwin press, USA
  10. Hanushek, E. and L. Woessmann (2020), “The economics impacts of learning losses”. Education Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/21908d74-e.
  11. Klein, Stephen (2012). Learning:principles and applications, 6th ed., SAGE Publications
  12. Kruse, S., Gray, J. (2019). A case study approach to educational leadership, Routledge
  13. Lieberman, M. (2020). COVID-19 and remote learning: How to make it work. Edweek, https://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/reopeningschools/covid-19-remote-learning-how-to-make-it.html
  14. Limjuco, R. (2016), Academic proficiency, internship performance, and the preparedness to ASCP certification of the medical technology graduates in region XI:Basis for the enhancement of clinical internship curriculum, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304888253_Academic_proficiency_internship_performance_rating_and_the_preparedness_to_ASCP_certification_of_the_medical_technology_graduates_in_Region_XI_Basis_for_the_enhancement_of_clinical_internship_curricula
  15. Maddix, M., Estep, J., Lowe, M. (2012), Best practices of online education:a guide for Christian higher education, Information Age Publishing Inc., USA
  16. Main, P.(2022), Social Learning Theory, https://www.structural.learning.com/post/social-learning-theory-bandura
  17. Meriam, S. (2014), Adult learning:linking theory and practice, Jossey-Bass a Wiley brand, San Francisco
  18. O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., Vignare, K. (2020), Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID19; Faculty playbook. Every Learner Everywhere, http://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources
  19. Picciano, A., Dziuban, C., Graham, C., Moskal, P. (2022), Blended learning: Reasearch perspective, Volume 3, Routledge Taylor and Francis group, New York
  20. Price, K., Nelson, K. (2019), Planning effective instruction, diversity responsive methods and management, 6th ed., Cengage learning, Boston, USA
  21. Vaughan, N., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, R. (2013), Teaching in blended learning environments; creating and sustaining community of inquiry. https://www.aupress.ca/books/120229-teaching-in-blended-learning-environments/.
  22. Veletsianos, G. (2016), Emergence and Innovation in digital learning; Foundations and applications.