Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 9 no. 9 (2023)

Modular Learning Modality of Department of Education: Learners’ Early Assessment of its Implementation

Chriszel Van Astillero | Honeylyn Mahinay

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study is conducted to determine the public senior high school learners’ assessment on implementing modular learning modality in terms of content and instruction, learning assessment, teacher-learner-parent/guardian collaboration, active and personalized learning, and inclusion. Descriptive-correlational design and stratified proportionate random sampling were utilized. Findings revealed that learners were very satisfied in the implementation of the modular distance learning modality in terms of learning assessment. Transferable skills were also found very challenging. There is no significant difference in the early assessment of the implementation of modular distance learning when grouped according to sex. There is a significant difference in the early assessment of learners in implementing modular distance learning in terms of learning assessment when grouped according to track. No significant difference was found in the early evaluation of the implementation of Modular Distance Learning in terms of content and instruction, teacher-learner-parent/guardian collaboration, active and personalized learning, and inclusion.



References:

  1. Abarro, J. O. (2016). Factors Affecting Career Track and Strand Choices of Grade 9 Students in the Division of Antipolo and Rizal, Philippines. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/61867257/Factors_Affecting_Career_Track_and_Stran20200122-78643-1aljecv-libre.pdf?1579762751=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DFactors_Affecting_Career_Track_and_
    Stran.pdf&Expires=1679045023&Signature=NEEYmraBdOIZE8YWfdMknAZIA35rVhu0cZff3oX2JlQcdvlEiX9rCSwqMK
    BENBmlXhnlBgAXcg9fmqw0BAHIdkZEPhfUYmAgOGh09HzSWeB9M7PlDaBqdUsOs8vQ8pNczOjYOPzKqtca9~mljuAlTio
    PZ0x7pM0x1ML~77zHGDX5djgQoUiVzVFzj3W~rhQy6M4YN52B3qZWW48hiLlf8qPVdRv8QXxZRC8R97WrkB3hecOEJ~
    GSOQoetIj7CoMuleVEIbDPtNg4UmC9I8QCfGyUJGHwLWbCGdfTNlro135QKf47Ib2U5X1lANYbBqVDrhCAbQ~rb71rrMp
    89w__&KeyPairId=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
  2. Acuram, J.V. (2015). Instructional Module and Its Component. https://creativeandhumble.wordpress.com/2015/08/12/instructional-module-and-its-components/
  3. Adegbile, J.A (2009). Evaluation in curriculum and instruction. Ibadan: Powerhouse Press and Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samson-Sunday-Afolabi/publication/345911038_Enhancing_Effective_Assessment_and_Evaluation_Skills_of_PreService_Teachers_by_
    Incorporating_Assessment_and_Evaluation_Practice_into_Teaching_Practice_Exercise/links/5fb1c70f45851518fda9beac/
    Enhancing-Effective-Assessment-and-Evaluation-Skills-of-Pre-Service-Teachers-byIncorporatingAssessment-and-Evaluation-Practice-into-Teaching
    -Practice-Exercise.pdf
  4. Agayon, A. J. D., Agayon, A. K. R., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Teachers in The New Normal: Challenges and Coping Mechanisms in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development. Vol.4 No.1. Retrieved from https://theshillonga.com/index.php/jhed/article/view/296
  5. Akyuz, H. I. H. (2015). Effect of Educational Agent and Its Form Characteristics on Problem Solving Ability Perception of Students in Online Task Based Learning Media. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 265–281. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/79ea/12e819b9065ae266e93818009f8359457787.pdf
  6. Alangui, W.V. (2017). Ethnomathematics and culturally relevant mathematics education in the Philippines (Chapter 8). http//doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_8.Retrievedfromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_
    students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  7. Ali, R., Ghazi, S. R., Khan, M. S., Hussain, S., & Faitma, Z. T. (2010). Effectiveness of Modular Teaching in Biology at Secondary Level. Asian Social Science. Vol. 6, No. 9. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a002/4b15d7c55edbebe3a 42cc1dfe58b98209760.pdf
  8. Altan, T. & Seferoglu, S.S. (2009). Evaluation Process in Distance Education The Contributions of Student Opinions to the Development of the System. Retrieved from https://avesis.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayin/85dc07f8-dc84-44e1-9117-df5e86bf0 254/uzaktan-egitimde- degerlendirme-sureci-ogrenci-goruslerinin-sistemin-gelisim ine-katkilari
  9. Anzaldo, G. D. (2021). Modular Distance Learning in the New Normal Education Amidst Covid-19. International Journal of Scientific Advances ISSN: 2708-7972. DOI: 10.51542/ijscia.v2i3.6. Retrieved from https://www.ijscia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Volume2-Issue3-May-Jun-No.79-263-266.pdf
  10. Aranas, M. A. (2020). Modular Learning Delivery Mode: A Must or A Need? Retrieved from http://www.depedbataan.com/resources/4/modular_learning_delivery_mode_a_must_or_a_need.docx.pdf
  11. Baker, T., & Clark, J. (2010). Cooperative learning – a double-edged sword: A cooperative learning model for use with diverse student groups. Intercultural Education, 21, 257–268. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  12. Basham, J. D., Hall, T. E., & Carter, R. A. (2016). An Operationalized Understanding of Personalized Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416660835. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0162643416660835
  13. Bayod, R. P., Forosuelo, E. J., Morante, J. P., & Guerra, M. C. (2021). Bracing for the new normal or postnormal? Challenges and aspirations of indigenous parents for education of their children. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 31(3). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/RogelioBayod/publication/350808983_Bracing_for_the_Ne_Normal_or_Post_Normal
    _Challenges_and_Aspirations_of_Indigenous_Parents_for_the_Education_of_their_Children/links/6073e00592851c8a7bb
    e9924/Bracing-for-the-Ne-Normal-or-Post-Normal-Challenges-and-Aspirations-of-Indigenous-Parents-for-the
    -Education-of-their-Children.pdf
  14. Bayucca, S. A. (2021). Challenges Encountered and Technical Assistance Needed by Parents and Learners Utilizing Modular Distance Learning: Basis for a Proposed Support Program. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 128-135. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3998829
  15. Belecina, R.R., & Ocampo, J.M. (2018). Effecting change in students' critical thinking in problem-solving. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, 10(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.2121/edu-ijes.v10i2.949. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning
    _gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  16. Berry, R. (2010). Teachers' Orientations towards Selecting Assessment Strategies. New Horizons in Education, v58 n1 p96-107. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ966618
  17. Biehler, R., Fischer, P.R., Hochmuth, R., & Wassong, Th. (2010). How to support students learning mathematical bridging – course using an ITS? Remedial Scenarios in European project Math–Bridge.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1.1.174.8927 . https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ryan-Dio/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_
    analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning/links/600c0afca6fdccdcb8737120/Contextualized-learning-modules-in-bridging-students-learning-gaps-in-calculus-with-analytic-geometry-through-independent-learning.pdf
  18. Bojuwoye, O., Moletsane, M., Stofile, S., Moolla, N., & Sylvester, F. (2014). Learners’ experiences of learning support in selected Western Cape schools. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/106645
  19. Bongala, J. V., Bobis, V. B., Castillo, J. P. R., & Marasigan, A. C. (2020). Pedagogical strategies and challenges of multigrade schoolteachers in Albay, Philippines. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 22(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-06-2019-0037. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joefrey-Chan/publication/350848604_Multigrade_teachers'_experiences_and_learning_assessments_on_modular_remote_
    teaching_during_the_COVID-19_pandemic/links/6077a602881fa114b402b47c/Multigrade-teachers-experiences-and-learning-assessments-on-modular-remote-teaching-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic.pdf
  20. Boston University (2021). Active Learning: Teaching Guide. BU Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/ctl/guides/active-learning/
  21. Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate Criteria: Key to Effective Rubrics. DOI:10.3389/feduc.2018.00022. retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/324445191_Appropriate_Criteria_Key_to_Effective_Rubrics
  22. Brookhart, S. M. and Chen, F. (2014). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. DOI:10.1080/00131911.2014.929565. retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271932780_The_quality_and_effectiveness_of_descriptive_rubrics
  23. Buchs C., and Butera F. (2015). “Cooperative learning and social skills development,” in Collaborative Learning: Developments in Research and Practice, ed. Gillies R. (New York, NY: Nova Science), 201–217. Retrieved from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_A593B6B4EF0F.P001/REF.pdf and http://europepmc.org/article/PMC/6113388
  24. Cabradilla, J., Carreon, K. A., & Fontanilla, J. P. (2021). Effectiveness of Modular Distance Learning Modality to the Senior High School Students in President Elpidio Quirino National High School. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/522199362/Effectiveness-of-Modular-Distance-Learning-to-the- SHS-Students-in-PEQNHS-1#
  25. Cabual, R. A. (2021). Learning Styles and Preferred Learning Modalities in the New Normal. Open Access Library Journal. Vol. 8, No. 4. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=108297
  26. Caganan, R. G., & Buenvinida, L. P. (2021). Lived Experiences of Senior High School Teachers on Distance Learning Delivery Modalities: A Basis for Curriculum Planning Model. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities (IJMESH), Vol. 4(2), 118-128. Retrieved from https://journals.researchsynergypress.com/index.php/ijmesh/article/view/668/310
  27. Cañete, K. & Potane, J. (2022). Senior High School Students' Assessment of Academic Support on Modular Distance Learning During COVID-19. International Journal of Arts and Social Science (IJASS) ISSN: 2581-7922, Volume 5 Issue 2, Page 110-123, February 2022. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4036861
  28. Carvalho, A. (2016). The impact of PBL on transferable skills development in management education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1020327.Retrieved from https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703297.2015.1020327#.YLEWP43ivIU
  29. Chan, J. R., Marasigan, A. C., & Santander, N. T. (2021). Multigrade teachers’ experiences and learning assessments on modular remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joefrey-Chan/publication/350848604_Multigrade_teachers'_experiences_and_learning_assessments_on_modular_remote_
    teaching_during_the_COVID19_pandemic/links/6077a602881fa114b402b47c/Multigrade-teachers-experiences-and-learning
    -assessments-on-modular-remote-teaching-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic.pdf
  30. Charbonneau, E., & Van Ryzin, G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 54 – 65. Doi: 10.1177/0275074010397333. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp14275.pdf
  31. Cheng, C. M., & Abu Bakar, M. B. (2010). The Impact of Using Modules in The Teachingand Learning of English In Malaysian Polytechnics: An Analysis of The Viewsand Perceptions of English Language Lecturers. Retrieved from https://pdfcoffee.com/eapp-concept-paper-8-pdf-free.html And http://www.polimelaka.edu.my/portalpmk/images/images/JPA/research/cmc_mab.pdf
  32. Chuang, L. F. (2009). An exploratory study of Gender Differences in Instructional Preferences: The Case of University Students in the USA. Unpublished paper Fooyin University. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068392.pdf
  33. Clark, A. (2011). Embedding Transferable skills and enhancing student learning in a political science research methods module: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Conner, L. N. (2013). Meeting the Needs of Diverse Learners in New Zealand. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2013.795927. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1045988X.2013.795927
  35. Crowe, N. (2015). The problem with modular learning and 3 easy ways to fix it. eLearning Industry. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/problem-modular-learning-3-easy-ways-fix
  36. Dangle, Y. & Sumaoang, J. (2020). The implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools. 3 rd International Conferenceon Advanced Research in Teaching and Education. Retrieved from https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/27-427.pdf
  37. Dargo, J.M., & Dimas, M. (2021). Modular Distance Learning: Its Effect in the Academic Performance of Learners in the New Normal. Journal of Education Teaching and Learning 6(2):204. DOI:10.26737/jetl.v6i2.2672. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356436791_Modular_Distance_Learning_Its_Effect_in_the_Academic_
    Performance_of_Learners_in_the_New_Normal
  38. Deed, C., Lesko, T. M., & Lovejoy, V. (2014). Teacher adaptation to personalized learning spaces. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.919345. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13664530.2014.919345
  39. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (2007). Developing, monitoring and reporting on personal learning goals. Retrieved from https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/teachingresources/social/personal/devpers learngoal.pdf
  40. DepEd, (2020). Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC) CG Codes & Guidelines. Retrieved from https://guroph.com/melc-cg-codes-and-guidelines/
  41. DepEd XII’s Region Memorandum CLMD No. 55, s. 2020, Enclosure Nos. 4-7: Survey Questionnaires in Assessing Conduct of Alternative Learning Modalities for Modular Distance Learning Modality (MDL). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/470337788/Region-Memorandum-CLMD-55-REGION-WIDE-CONDUCT-OF-PILOT-TESTS-FOR-THE-DIFFERENT-LEARNING-MODALITIES
  42. DepEd Division Memorandum 272 s. 2020
  43. DepEd Memorandum No. 53 s. 2020
  44. Dewi, P.Y.A., & Primayana, K.H. (2019). Effect of Learning Module with Setting Contextual Teaching and Learning to Increase the Understanding of Concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26. http://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ryan-Dio/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_
    analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning/links/600c0afca6fdccdcb8737120/ConteContextualized-learning-modules-in-bridging-students-learning-gaps-in-calculus-with-analytic-geometry-through-independent-learning.pdf
  45. Diga, C. C. (2020). Importance of MELC. Retrieved from http://www.depedbataan.com/resources/4/importance_of_melc.pdf
  46. Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. PubMed Central. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Nov; 118: 105440. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476883/
  47. Duron, R., Limbach, B. and Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework for Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Volume 17, Number 2, 160-166. Retrieved from https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE55.pdf
  48. Espineli, N. P. (2021). Lived Experiences of Master Teachers in Monitoring Modular Distance Learning (MDL) Teachers at TMCNHS. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp.148 – 156. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3811648
  49. Estrada, L. P. R. (2021). Are self-learning modules effective? Retrieved from https://www.rappler.com/voices/imho/opinion-are-self-learning-modules-effective
  50. Freeman, L., & Greenacre, L. (2010). An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 5–17. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  51. Friedman, B., Bobrowski, P., & Markow, D. (2007). Predictors of parents’ satisfaction with their children’s school. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(3), 278 – 288. Doi: 10.1108/09578230710747811. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp14275.pdf
  52. Gao, X.W., Liu, H.Y., Xu, B.B., Cui, M., & Lv, J. (2018). Element differential method with the simplest quadrilateral and hexahedron quadratic elements for solving heat conduction problems. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 73(4), 206–224. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/79ea/12e819b9065ae266 e93818009f8359457787.pdf
  53. Garcia, D. V. (2020). Advantages of Modular Distance Learning During Pandemic. Retrieved from http://www.depedbataan.com/resources/4/advantages_of_modular_distance_learning_during_pandemic.pdf
  54. Gibbons, S., & Silva, O. (2011). School quality, child wellbeing and parents’ satisfaction. Economics and Education Review, 30, 312 – 331. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp14275.pdf
  55. Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A Match or Mismatch Between Learning Styles of the Learners and Teaching Styles of the Teachers. I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science. DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.11.05. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abbas-Pourhosein-Gilakjani/publication/269 651644_A_Match_or_Mismatch_Between_Learning_Styles_of_the_Learners_and_Teaching_Styles_of _the_Teachers/links/5943fe6245851525f890a7da/A-Match -or-Mismatch-Between-Learning-Styles-of- the-Learners-and-Teaching-Styles-of-the-Teachers.pdf
  56. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933–940. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  57. Gonzalez, G., & Leticia, M. (2013). Learning Goals and Strategies in the Self-regulation of Learning. US-China Education Review A v3 n1 p46-50. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539959
  58. Gordon, S., & Nicholas, J. (2013) Students’ conceptions of mathematics bridging courses. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(1), 109-125. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.644779/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning
    _gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  59. Gulati S. (2008). Compulsory participation in online discussions: Is this constructivism or normalisation of learning?Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45 (2), 183-192. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.11120/jebe.2010.05010027
  60. Hamalainen, R., & Vahasantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6, 169–184. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  61. Hamdunah, H., Yunita, A., Zulkardi, & Muhafzan, M. (2016). Development of a constructivist module and web on circle and sphere material with Wingeom software. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 109- 116. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3536.109-116. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  62. Hamweete, W. (2010). Quality Assurance in Modules at the Institute of Distance Education. University of Zambia, Institute of Distance Education. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/huria/article/view/110805
  63. Hedges, Mary R, Gail A. Pacheo, and Don J. Webber (2014). ‘What determines students’ choices of elective modules.’ In International Review of Economics Education 17: 39-54. Retrieved from https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/2774391/Benefits_Challenges_Modular_Higher_Ed_Curricula_SFrench_v3-green-2.pdf
  64. Hedjazi, Y., & Omidi, M. (2013). Factors affecting the academic success of agricultural students at University of Tehran, Iran. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology. 10(3), 205-214. Retrieved from http://arjess.org/education-research/a-review-of-the-coping-strategies-used-by-male-and-female-open-and-distance-learning-students.pdf
  65. Hennessy, Eilis, Rosario Hernandez, Patricia Kieran and Henry MacLoughlin (2010). ‘Teaching and learning across disciplines: student and staff experiences in a newly modularised system.’ In Teaching in Higher Education 15:6, 675-689. Retrieved from https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/2774391/Benefits_Challenges_Modular_Higher_Ed_Curricula_SFrench_v3-green-2.pdf
  66. Herrera, C., & Dio, R. (2016). Extent of Readiness of Grade 10 Students for General Mathematics of Senior High School in Sorsogon City, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(4), 1-8. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2017/1710-1485756132.pdf. And https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  67. Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., Barbarin, O. (2008). Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S088520060700035X
  68. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037–1065. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  69. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15–29. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  70. Kalelioglu, F. & Gulbahar, Y. (2010). Investigating The Usage Of Blogs In Educational Settings From Multiple Intelligences Perspective. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Filiz-Kalelioglu/publication/280943955_Investigating_the_usage_of_blogs_in_educational_settings_from_multiple_intelligences
    _perspective/links/57c6c96e08ae28c01d4eedf5/Investigating-the-usage-of-blogs-in-educational-settings-from-multiple-intelligences-perspective.pdf
  71. Kamamia, L., Ngugi, K. & Thinguri, R. (2014). To establish the extent to which the subject mastery enhances quality teaching to student-teachers during teaching practice. International Journal of Education and Research. ISSN: 2201-6333 (Print) ISSN: 2201-6740. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/July-2014/51.pdf
  72. Karal, H., and Cebi, A. (2012). Views on Modular Assessment and Evaluation Process in Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.430. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812015595
  73. Karim, A. A., Shah, P. M., Khalid, F., Ahmad, M., & Din, R. (2015). The Role of Personal Learning Orientations and Goals in Students’ Application of Information Skills in Malaysia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/html/7- 6302759_60852.htm?pagespeed=noscript
  74. Karimah, S., Hidayah, N., & Utami, R. (2020). Developing mathematics module of Kapita Selekta course based on higher-order-thinking skills for high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1), 012034. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012034. / https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  75. Keles, M.K., & Ozel, S.A. (2016). A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems. DOI: 10.5772/65222. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/52577
  76. Kizlik, B. (2014). Measurement, Assessment and Evaluation in Education. Retrieved on 12/6/2015 from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samson-Sunday-Afolabi/publication/345911038_Enhancing_Effective_Assessment_and_Evaluation_Skills_of_Pre-Service_Teachers_by_
    Incorporating_Assessment_and_Evaluation_Practice_into_Teaching_Practice_Exercise/links/5fb1c70f45851518fda9beac/Enhancing-Effective-Assessment-and-Evaluation-Skills-of-Pre-Service-Teachers-by-Incorporating-Assessment-and-Evaluation-Practice-into-Teaching-Practice-Exercise.pdf
  77. Lardizabal, C. (2004). Priciples and methods of teaching. Quezon City: Phoenix Publishing House Inc.
  78. Lau, E.Y.H., Li, H. & Rao, N. (2011). Parental involvement and children's readiness for school in China. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.552243. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00131881.2011.552243
  79. Lau, W.W.F., &Yuen, A.H.K. (2010). Gender differences in learning styles: Nurturing a gender and style sensitive computer science classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 26(7), 1090- 1103. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068392.pdf
  80. Li, M., & Campbell, J. (2008). Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 19, 203–216. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/ 0305764X.2016.1259389
  81. Linguete, C. A. (2019). Assembling Consumer Industrial Products Using Instructional Mock-Ups. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts. Issue: Vol. 3 No. 2C (2019). Retrieved from https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/5384
  82. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. Blended Learning: Differences in Instructional Outcomes and Learner Satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, v11 n2 p27-42. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ842695
  83. Llego, M. A. (2020). DepEd Learning Modallities for School Year 2020-2021. Retrieved from https://www.teacherph.com/deped-learning-delivery-modalities/
  84. Luaña, J. P. (2021). Why do Parents Answer their Children’s Modules? A Closer Look on Parental Practices and Challenges in Modular Distance Learning. International Journal of Global Community. Retrieved from https://www.riksawan.com/IJGC-RI/index.php/IJGC-RI/article/view/83
  85. Madarang, C. R. S. (2020). After DepEd’s call to report module blunders, public reminded of ‘unpreparedness’ for distance learning. Retrieved from https://interaksyon.philstar.com/politics- issues/2020/10/14/178692/after-depeds-call-to-report-module-blunders-public-reminded-of- unpreparedness-for-distance-learning/
  86. Madrazo, A.L., & Dio, R.V. (2020). Contextualized learning modules in bridging students' learning gaps in calculus with analytic geometry through independent learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  87. Maile, C. A., & Cooper, M. S. (2018). The CIMC guide to developing modules for self-paced learning: A handbook for teachers. Oklahoma: Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education, Curriculum and Instructional Materials Center (CIMC). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  88. Manlangit P., Paglumotan, A.M., and Sapera, S.C. (2020). Kayong Maging Tagapagdaloy:Supercharging Filipino Parents is Key for Successful Modular Distance Learning. FlipScience. Retrieved from www.flipscience.ph/news/features-news/tagapagdaloy-modular-distance-learning/.
  89. Mañalac, M. C. (2021). The Challenges of Modular Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.depedbataan.com/resources/4/the_challenges_of_modular_distance_learning.pdf Martineau, M. D., Charland, P., Arvisais, O., & Vinuesa, V. (2020). Education and COVID-19: challenges and opportunities. Canadian Commission for UNESCO. Retrieved from https://en.ccunesco.ca/idealab/education-and-covid-19-challenges-and-opportunities
  90. Matarazzo, K.L., Durik, A.M., & Delaney, M.L. (2010). The effect of humorous instructional materials on interest in a math task. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9178- 5. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  91. Mayol, P. A. (2020). The Paradigm Shift For Teachers’ Challenges In The New Normal. Retrieved from https://cebufinest.com/paradigm-shift-teachers-challenges-new-normal/
  92. McDowell, L., Wakelin, D., Montgomery, C., & King, S. (2010). Does assessment for learning make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.488792. Retrieved from https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2010.488792#.YLjpDIXivIU
  93. Melton, R. F. (2002). Planning and Development Open and Distance Learning: A Quality Assurance Approach. London: Routledge Falmer
  94. Moore, M. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems review. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Retrieved on from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918904.pdf
  95. Moradi, M., Liu, L., Luchies, C., Patterson, M. M., & Darban, B. (2018). Enhancing Teaching-Learning Effectiveness by Creating Online Interactive Instructional Modules for Fundamental Concepts of Physics and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030109. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/8/3/109/htm
  96. National Economic and Development Authority (2017). Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), Pasig City, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ryan-Dio/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_
    analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning/links/600c0afca6fdccdcb8737120/Contextualized-learning-modules-in-bridging-students-learning-gaps-in-calculus-with-analytic-geometry-through-independent-learning.pdf
  97. Oginni, O. I., & Owobali, O. T. (2012). Integration of programmed instruction into mathematics and science teaching: A panacea to students dwindling interest in mathematics and science in Nigerian schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 199-209. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086380.pdf. And https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ryan-Dio/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning/links/600c0afca6fdccdcb8737120/Contextualized-learning-modules-in-bridging-students-learning-gaps-in-calculus-with-analytic-geometry-through-independent-learning.pdf
  98. Okai-Ugbaje, S., Ardzejewska, K., & Imran, A. (2020). Readiness, roles, and responsibilities of stakeholders for sustainable mobile learning adoption in higher education. Education Sciences 10(3), 49. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/64624258/Secondary%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20Preparation,%20Challenges
    ,%20and%20Coping%20Mechanism.pdf?1602135933=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DSecondary_Teachers_Preparation_Challenge.pdf&Expires=1619928309&Signature=XV-gFPHAr6lW8vOFXX-uRoOIx4Ky4oNPyQKdnPWDSh2epLNoKOkA2xivZM-deV-4zaLqybGtOYwYiLvRgc~TovKBjp2wmAr-hYQmQ5WYpropIlxMWaQO4C3pOpOzCAILpDERInoYEoWyG3gQu4-mcQ3JfmF~gSwuMIlVSmfBM83Zt6NJkoSTOSCA7FZjo-1NMk3-iPSJNKZ2RSdfwD6apxVI0nOjcru6wDe8coH7S7TNK9Jge2e3qqxhK6vuzb5caCm7oXeFs-hSblB0~n7~W5~mZvSW5Tsz3zUmTMq1kuuc~~VcSwJbZN4aXLEg2AAOL~p~1KwVk5UWAm8Gd0F8Jw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
  99. Olivo, M. G. (2021). Parents’ Perception on Printed Modular Distance Learning in Canarem Elementary School: Basis for Proposed Action Plan. Vol 2 No 4 (2021): International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.ijmaberjournal.org/index.php/ijmaber/article/view/106
  100. Ouma G.O., Awuor F.M., & Kyambo B. (2013). E-Learning readiness in public secondary schools in Kenya. Eur. J. Open Distance E-learn. 2013;16(2):97–110. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654229/
  101. Oz, G., & Orak, S. D. (2018). An Evaluation Of Modular Teaching In The Preparatory English Program: A Quantitative Case Study. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331639229_AN_EVALUATION_OF_MODULAR_TEACHING_IN_THE_
    PREPARATORY_ENGLISH_PROGRAM_A_QUANTITATIVE_CASE_STUDY
  102. Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2008). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology, 28, 47–58. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  103. Rathod, G. & Parmar, P. (2020). Development of an E-learning Module and Evaluation of this Method of Teaching to Supplement Traditional Education in Pathology. Retrieved from http://seajme.md.chula.ac.th/articleVol14No1/Article%2013-SC%2003-01-2020.pdf
  104. Reddy, M. R. (2005). Importance of Course Module in Academic Performance of Students at University Level. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjurYaOnrDwAhV1KaYKHf-iDswQFjARegQIDhAD&url=
    https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ajol.info%2Findex.php%2Fejesc%2Farticle%2Fview%2F41986%2F9144&usg=AOvVaw3fVPflBzYtYsxdTdxQWDod
  105. Reddy, Y. M., and Andrade, H. (2009). A review of rubric use in higher education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602930902862859
  106. Reiser, B. J. (2013). What Professional Development Strategies Are Needed for Successful Implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards? Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.800.1266&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  107. Reyes, J.D. Insorio, A.O., Ingreso, M.L.V., & Hilario, F.F. (2019). Conception and application of contextualization education. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 1-18. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/ download/article-file/664590. And https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  108. Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G.W., Hughes, E., & Fries, K. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 31(3), 235-252. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  109. Robertson, S. I. (2004). Students Perceptions of Students Perception of Module Questionnaires: Questionnaire Completion as Problem Solving. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (6): 665-679. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232832342
  110. Roble, D. M. L. (2021). Competency Level, Employers’ Expectations and Work Immersion Performance of Senior High School Technical-vocational and Livelihood (TVL) Students. Asian Journal on Perspectives in Education. Online ISSN: 2799-1296 AJPE (2021), Volume 1, Issue 2. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Donnie-Marc-Louie-Roble/publication/354863824_Competency_Level_Employers'_Expectations_and_Work_Immersion_Performance_of_
    Senior_High_School_Technical-vocational_and_Livelihood_TVL_Students/links/6151cddaf8c9c51a8af9f808/Competency-Level-Employers-Expectations-and-Work-Immersion-Performance-of-Senior-High-School-Technical-vocational-and-Livelihood-TVL-Students.pdf
  111. Rosita, C. D. (2016). The development of courseware based on mathematical representations and arguments in number theory courses. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 131-140. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i2.p131-140. And https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  112. Rufii, R. (2015). Developing Module on Constructivist Learning Strategies to Promote Students’ Independence and Performance. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rufii-Rufii/publication/346976033_Developing_Module_on_Constructivist_Learning_Strategies_to_Promote_Students%27_
    Independence_and_Performance/links/5fd735c592851c13fe84e72d/Developing-Module-on-Constructivist-Learning-Strategies-to-Promote-Students-Independence-and-Performance.pdf
  113. Sadiq, S., & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in Teaching at University Level. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.5, No.17, 2014. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234635879.pdf
  114. Saifiyah, S., Ferdianto, F., & Setiyani (2017). Design of Learning Modules Based on Mathematical Communication Skills and Student Learning Motivation [in Bahasa]. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no2.2017pp177-192. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  115. Salma, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2012). Students’ difficulties in comprehending mathematical word problems in English language learning context. International Research, 1(3).
  116. San Antonio, D. M. (2020). Suggested Strategies in Implementing Distance Learning Delivery Modalities (DLDM) for School Year 2020-2021. Retrieved from https://region8.deped.gov.ph/wp- content/uploads/2020/07/RM-s2020-393.pdf
  117. Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular Method of Teaching. International Journal for Research in Education. Vol.2. Issue 2. Retrieved from https://raijmronlineresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/29_169-171-dr-kandarp-sejpal.pdf
  118. Shantz, A., & Latham, G. P. (2012). Transfer of training: Written self-guidance to increase self-efficacy and interviewing performance of job seekers. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 733-746. doi:10.1002/hrm.21497. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/July-2014/51.pdf
  119. Shuey, S. (2002). Assessing Online Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, v16 n2 p13-18. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id= EJ657776.
  120. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C. & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: a review of the literature. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12528-011-9045-8/
  121. Singh, H. (2014). Differentiating Classroom Instruction to Cater Learners of Different Styles. Indian Journal of Research, 3(12), 58-60. http://doi.org/ 10.15373/22501991. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_
    gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  122. Thomas, M. (2020). The Problems Faced by Students in Distance Learning. Retrieved from https://classroom.synonym.com/problems-faced-students-distance-learning-1303.html
  123. Torrefranca, E. C. (2017). Development And Validation Of Instructional Modules On Rational Expressions And Variations. Journal on Teacher Education. Retrieved from https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/normallights/article/view/375
  124. UNESCO (2020). Latin American Education Systems in response to COVID-19: Educational continuity and assessment: analysis from the evidence of the Latin American Laboratory for Assessment of the Quality of Education (LLECE). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374018_eng
  125. Utemov, V., Khusainova, R., Sergeeva, M., & Shestak, V. (2018). Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1619. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ryan-Dio/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_in_calculus_with_analytic
    _geometry_through_independent_learning/links/600c0afca6fdcc600c0afca6fdccdcb8737120/Contextualized-learning-modules-in-bridging-students-learning-gaps-in-calculus-with-analytic-geometry-through-independent-learning.pdf
  126. Vallejo, O. T. (2019). Personality and Socio-Economic Factors Influencing the Choice of Academic Track among Senior High Schoolers. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review. Vol. 7 (3), pp. 28-33, May 2019. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/61226379/Personality_and_Socio-Economic_Factors_Influencing_the_Choice_of_Academic_Track_among_Senior_High_Schoolers_published20191115-83003-1fg9-libre.pdf?1573830008=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DPersonality_and_Socio_Economic_Factors_I.pdf&Expires=1679045040&Signature=WHUKlZRiQUg36~7TQRSVcdMs8uEUPT2Cir~C47dIxDRqQN-KPHx9vL4Shu749j8OnyJsjglg5UTIeQFhiQdZ6j3DzDUUuffR
    Yn6fC8cJRG91U3DJG61sGTizkjvaQBbtPeQmL6xtbHnYWaR7ZGtoOIQIj5on~9paboT9hjch12LDUtHwToUJbFrTV3F5dL0y0QYaKsbT25WIYfMw1YzwoEmqWaItoeYX-U1phScey0a-01tbea1qBVl49IgxqIjou89Z0cjmJGd69d0HnY19RYPiu7EIOC
    XaHEE1IseXllfGhLTR7nXSbDTZSk-pWi8wD2IMk1yHkTm~mtUnWi7ikQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
  127. van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishueizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: Support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort, and appreciation of support. Cham: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z
  128. Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2013). Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1377–1386. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  129. Wedemeyer, C. (1981). Learning at the back door: Reflections on non-traditional learning in the lifespan. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Retrieved from https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/learning-at-the-back-door-reflections-on-non-traditional-learning-in-the-lifespan-1nbsped-0299085600-9780299085605-1607523728-9781607523727.html and http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/cde/found/
    simons99.htm#:~:text=Wedemeyer%20proposed%20the%20separation%20of,or%20through%20some%20other%20medium    .
  130. Widodo, S. A., Prahmana, R. C. I., Purnami, A. S., & Turmudi. (2018). Teaching materials of algebraic equation. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 943(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/943/1/012017. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347428185_Contextualized_learning_modules_in_bridging_students'_learning_gaps_
    in_calculus_with_analytic_geometry_through_independent_learning
  131. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2010). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208994. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969 594042000208994
  132. Wongwatkit, C., Srisawasdi, N., Hwang, G. J., & Panjaburee, P. (2016). Enhancing Learning Attitudes and Performance of Students in Physics with a Mastery Learning Mechanism-Based Personalized Learning Support System. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7756977
  133. Zhang, T. (2021). Chinese parents’ perception of emergency remote K-12 teaching-learning in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education. Volume 6, Issue 1, 2021. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1117&context=education_publications

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic