Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 13 no. 1 (2023)

The Level of Effectiveness of Blended Learning Among Public Secondary Schools in the Division of Quezon

Jenny Linguete

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study determined the level of effectiveness of blended learning among the public secondary schools in the Division of Quezon, School Year 2020-2021 along with the Lesson Delivery, Learner’s Engagement, Learner’s Achievement, and Learner’s Assessment; the problems encountered; the coping strategies employed; and the generated Policy Recommendations towards quality education.The descriptive-evaluative-correlational method was employed while survey-questionnaire was used in the data gathering.The following findings have surfaced; the effectiveness of blended learning among public secondary schools were Learner’s Achievement, (3.73); and Learner Assessment, (3.69), while Lesson Delivery, (3.370); and Learner’s Engagement (3.34) were considered effective. On the problems encountered; Teachers need customizable instructional delivery models, (3.72); Creating an Effective Self- Paced Learning Environment, (3.72); and a Comprehensive Learning Management System which offers flexibility and ease of use (3.71) were rated much serious. On the Coping Strategies; Positivity despite hardships, (4.05).This study was delimited to its respondents who were public secondary (JHS) teachers in the Division of Quezon that employed blended learning delivery modality.The sudden onset of pandemic had brought profound significant challenges in the education system. With all the substantial and reliable information that blended learning is not only necessary to survival in the academe during crisis but an essential delivery method for long-term success. Whereas the Policy Recommendation generated in this study could be a valuable foundation for a foreseeable future of blended learning delivery modality.



References:

  1. Backstorm, C.H., & Hursh - Cesar, G. (1999). Survey Research. New York: John Wtley and  Sons. 
  2. Bernard, H.R. (2002). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative  Methods, 3rd Edition.Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA. 
  3. Blake, Robert (2016). Brave New Digital Classroom. Georgetown University Press.  Blokdyk, Gerardus (2020). Feasibility Study: A Complete Guide 2020. Goodreads Publishing.  
  4. Bouwman, Harry (2012). Information and Communication Technology in Organizations:  Adoption, Implementation, Use and Effects. SAGE Publications Ltd  
  5. Broto, Antonio S. (2006). Statistics Made Simple 2nd Edition: National Bookstore. Bruner, Jerome Seymour (1971) The Process of Education and Towards a Theory of Instruction 
  6. Calayag, Eleanor H. and Valenzuela, Edwin E. (2019). Feasibility Study Guidelines for  Undergraduate Courses. Amazon Book Clubs.  
  7. Campbell, William Giles, et.al (2003). Introduction to Statistics, Philippine Central Luzon State  University.  
  8. Freund, John E. and Gary Simon (1997), Modern Elementary Statistics 9th Edition, Singapore;  Simon Schute.  
  9. Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.),  Handbook of distance education, (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York: Routledge. 
  10. Johnston, Tony (2007) OFF to Kindergarten Hardcover, Children's Books. Growing Up & Facts  of Life.  
  11. Masanja, Ndalahwa (2020) - A Practical Guide to Writing a Feasibility Study. NMM  Publishing.M. B.  
  12. Horn and H. Staker, (2011) The rise of K-12 Blended Learning, Innosight Institute, Switzerland Morgan, Robin K. (2010). Quick Hits for Teaching with Technology. jstorwww.jstor.org  
  13. Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT and  our customers in higher education. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning:  Global perspectives, local designs, (pp. 155–168). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. 
  14. Siegel, Sydney, et.al (1988). Nonparametric Statistic for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition.  USA McGrow-Hill Company  
  15. Siegel, S. and Castellan, N. J. (1998). Statistics for Behavioral Sciences.  
  16. Webster II New Riverside University Dictionary (2001). Houghton Mifflin Company. 
  17. Agustin R. Veras, Jr. (2017). Proposed Blended Learning Model for Don Mariano Marcos  Memorial State University - South La Union Campus (DMMMSU-SLUC). SMCC Higher Education  Research Journal ISSN Print: 2449-4402 · ISSN online: 2467-6322 Volume 3 · January 2017  
  18. Ahn, J., Beck, A., Rice, J., & Foster, M. (2016). Exploring issue of implementation, equity, and  student achievement with educational software in the DC public schools. AERA Open, 2(4), 1-10. 
  19. Akgunduz, D., & Akinoglu, O. (2016). The effect of blended learning and social media-supported  learning on the students' attitude and self-directed learning skills in science education. Turkish Online  Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 15(2), 106-115. 
  20. Alijani, G. S., Kwun, O., K., & Yu, Y. (2014). Effectiveness of blended learning in KIPP New  Orleans’ schools. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(2), 125-141. 
  21. Ava Clare Marie O. Robles (2012) Blended Learning for Lifelong Learning: An Innovation for  College Education Students. College of Education, Mindanao State University, General Santos City,  Philippines.  
  22. I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science, 2012, 6, 1-8 Published Online June 2012 in MECS (http://www.mecs-press.org/) DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.06.01  
  23. Betchie E. Aguinaldo (2013) Implementing Blended Learning in an Impoverished Academic  Institution Using a Bricolage Approach Model. International Journal of Information and Education  Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2013.  
  24. Bottiani J.H., Duran C.A., Pas E.T., Bradshaw C.P. (2019) Teacher stress and burnout in urban  middle schools: Associations with job demands, resources, and effective classroom practices. Journal of  School Psychology.2019;77:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.002.  
  25. Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S. (2014). Effects of  blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423-437. 
  26. Camahalan, F. G., & Ruley, A. G. (2014). Blended learning and teaching writing: A teacher  action research project. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 15, 1-13. 
  27. Capponi, M. F., Nussbaum, M., Marshall, G., & Lagos, M. E. (2010). Pattern discovery for the  design of face-to-face computer-supported collaborative learning activities. Educational Technology &  Society, 13(2), 40-52. 
  28. Chang, C., Shu, K., Liang, C., Tseng, J., & Hsu, Y. (2014). Is blended e-learning as measured by  an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom learning for vocational high  school students. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 213-231. 
  29. Chang, I. H. (2011). The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’ technology  literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology & Society,  15 (2), 328-340 
  30. Curwood, J. S., & Cowell, L. H. (2011). iPoetry: Creating space for new literacies in the English  curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 110-120. 
  31. Cheung, A., & Slavin, R.E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for  enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research  Review, 9, 88-113. 
  32. Carver C.S., Connor-Smith J. (2010) Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology. 2010;  61:679–704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352. 
  33. Curwood, J. S., & Cowell, L. H. (2011). iPoetry: Creating space for new literacies in the English  curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 110-120. 
  34. De la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Enhancing online distance Education in small  rural US schools: A hybrid, learner-centered model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(4),  35-46. 
  35. Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Hermsdorfer, A., DeCantis, G., Norbrg, A., & Bradford, G., (2015) A  deconstruction of blended learning. Presented at the 11th annual Sloan-C blended learning conference  and workshop 
  36. Dziuban, C., Picciano, A. G., Graham, C. R., & Moskal, P. D. (2016). Conducting research in  online and blended learning environments: New pedagogical frontiers. New York: Routledge, Taylor &  Francis Group. 
  37. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W. ve Friedman, T. (2013). Preparing for Life in a Digital Age.  The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report, Australian  Council for Educational Research (ACER), Melbourne, Australia 
  38. Gilbert, J., & Flores-Zambada, R. (2011). Development and implementation of a “blended”  teaching course environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 244-260. 
  39. Gloria A. Peralta & Ruth A. Salazar (2016) Blended Learning in General Education HELE of St.  Mary's College of Quezon City, Philippines. Conference: National eLearning Conference 2016At: St.  Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines 
  40. Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL  and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72- 83.  
  41. Herman K.C., Reinke W.M., Eddy C.L. (2020) Advances in understanding and intervening in  teacher stress and coping: The Coping-Competence-Context Theory. Journal of School Psychology.  2020; 78:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.001. 
  42. Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the top 10 challenges of blended learning. Top 10 challenges of  blended learning. Available on cedma-europe.org. 
  43. Huang, Y., & Hong, Z. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on  students' information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational  Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175-193. 
  44. Huang, Y. H., Liang, T. P., Su, Y. Y., & Chen, N. N. (2012). Empowering personalized learning  with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Educational Technology  Research & Development, 60(4), 703-722. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6 
  45. International Association for K–12 Online Learning (2013). Mean what you say: Defining and  integrating personalized, blended and competency education. Vienna, VA: Patrick, S., Kennedy, K., &  Powell A. 
  46. Islam, A. K. M. N. (2014). Sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with a learning management  system in post-adoption stage: A critical incident technique approach. Computers in Human Behaviour,  30, 249–261 
  47. Jacobs, J. (2014). Beyond the factory model: Oakland teachers learn how to blend. Education  Next, 14 (4), 34-41
  48. Judith S. Rabacal (2018) Blended Learning: Unveiling its Potential in One ASEAN Classroom  Setting. Northern Negros State College of Science and Technology, Old Sagay, Sagay City, Negros  Occidental, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, August 2018. 
  49. Jose Mari M. Calamlam (2016) Effectiveness of Blended E-Learning Approach in a Flipped  Classroom Environment. The Asian Conference on Society, Education & Technology 2016 Official  Conference Proceedings 
  50. Kazu, I. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on high  school students' academic achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET,  13(1), 78-87. 
  51. Kintu, M. J., & Zhu, C. (2016). Student characteristics and learning outcomes in a blended  learning environment intervention in a Ugandan University. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3),  181–195. 
  52. Kintu, M.J., Zhu, C. & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship  between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14, 7 
  53. Klapproth, F., Federkeil, L., Heinschke, F., & Jungmann, T. (2020). Teachers’ experiences of  stress and their coping strategies during COVID-19 induced distance teaching. Journal of Pedagogical  Research, 4(4), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020062805 
  54. Koedinger, K. R., McLaughlin, E. A., & Heffernan, N. T. (2010). A quasi-experimental  evaluation of an on-line formative assessment and tutoring system. Journal of Educational Computing  Research, 43(4), 489-510. doi:10.2190/EC.43.4. d 
  55. Kuo, Y., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, L. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student  satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed  Learning, 14(1), 16–39 
  56. Kwak, D. W., Menezes, F. M., & Sherwood, C. (2013). Assessing the impact of blended learning  on student performance. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136. 
  57. Leo, J., & Puzio, K. (2016). Flipped instruction in a high school science classroom. Journal of  Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 775-781. 
  58. Manalo, Franz Kevin B. & De Villa, Jennilou A. (2020) Secondary Teachers' Preparation,  Challenges, and Coping Mechanism in the Pre -Implementation of Distance Learning in the New Normal  September 2020 International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2(3):144-154  DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4072845 
  59. MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies  during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative  emotions. System, 94, 102352. https://doi.org/10.016/j.system.2020.102352 
  60. Khalafullah, (2010) “Effectiveness of the use of e-learning and blended education in the  development of the skills of the production of educational models in the students of the Department of  Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, Al-Azhar University,” Journal of the Faculty of  Education, View at: Google Scholar 
  61. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended  learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1-47. 
  62. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Kaia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based  practices in online learning. Washington: US Department of Education.
  63. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended  learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. 
  64. Naaj, M. A., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended  learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,  11, 185–200. 
  65. Najafi, H., Evans, R., & Federico, C. (2014). MOOC integration into secondary school courses.  International Review of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 15(5), 306-322. 
  66. Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., and Balle, S. H., 2018. A Literature Review of the Factors  Influencing ELearning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and  Engagement. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), pp. 46-55, available online at www.ejel.org 
  67. Oberle E., Schonert-Reichl K.A. (2016) Stress contagion in the classroom? The link between  classroom teacher burnout and morning cortisol in elementary school students. Social Science &  Medicine. 2016;159:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.031. 
  68. Oxford Group, (2013). Blended learning-current use, challenges, and best practices. From  http://www.kineo.com/m/0/blended-learning-report-202013.pdf. Accessed on 17 Mar 2016. 
  69. Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., Hibbard, L., Oglesby, J., and Verma, S.  (2015). “Blending learning: The evolution of online and face-to-face education from 2008-2013”. The  International Association for K-12 Online Learning. 
  70. Reiners, T. R., Dreher, C. C., & Dreher, H. H. (2011). Six key topics for automated utilization and  acceptance. Informatics in Education, 10(1), 47-64. 
  71. Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C. & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the  implementation: Fidelity of technology immersion and its’ relationship with student achievement. The  Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(4). 5-66. 
  72. Siko, J. P. (2014). Testing the waters: An analysis of the student and parent experience in a  secondary school's first blended course offering. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance  Education, 29(2), 1-19. 
  73. Smith, J. G., & Smith, R. L. (2012). Screen-capture instructional technology: A cognitive tool for  designing a blended multimedia curriculum. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 207- 228. 
  74. Smith, J. G., & Suzuki, S. (2015). Embedded blended learning within an algebra classroom: A  multimedia capture experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 133-147. 
  75. Smith, J. G., (2015). Screen-capture instructional technology: A cognitive tool for designing a  blended multimedia curriculum. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 207-228. 
  76. Snyder, C., Paska, L. M., & Besozzi, D. (2014). Cast from the past: Using screen casting in the  social studies classroom. Social Studies, 105(6), 310-314. 
  77. Stanford, P., Crowe, M. W., & Flice, H. (2010). Differentiating with technology. TEACHING  Exceptional Children Plus, 6(4), 1-9. 
  78. Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., and May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and  learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56
  79. Trif, L. T. (2014). Theoretical and practical perspectives on personalized instructional systems.  Elearning & Software for Education, (3), 406-410. doi:10.12753/2066-026X-14-203 
  80. Thelal Iqab Owei (2018) “Effects of Using a Blended Learning Method on Students’  Achievement and Motivation to Learn English in Jordan: A Pilot Case Study” Volume 2018 |Article ID  7425924 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7425924 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2018/7425924/   
  81. Veysel karani Ceylan & Ayşe Elitok Kesici (2017) Effect of blended learning to academic  achievement February 2017 Journal of Human Sciences 14(1): 308 DOI: 10.14687/ jhs.v14i1.4141  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313683225_Effect_of_blended_learning_to_academic_achieve ment 
  82. Wendt, J. L., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2015). The effect of online collaboration on  adolescent sense of community in eighth-grade physical science. Journal of Science Education and  Technology, 24(5), 671-683 
  83. Z. Lal and A. Jundi (2010), “The trend towards e-learning among male and female teachers of  secondary schools in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and  Psychological Sciences, vol. II, no. 2, View at: Google Scholar 
  84. Agnes, Wong Sze Ki (2012) Relationship between Participation in the Webinar and Students’  Behaviours and Engagement in Online Learning. Master of Arts Department of Human Development and  Applied Psychology Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto 
  85. Brandy Hiett (2017) An Examination of Blended Learning and the Traditional Classroom Using  Achievement Scores. Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of  Doctor of Philosophy Educational Technology. Walden  
  86. De Guzman, Sofia (2015) Student Perceptions On The Impact Of Blended Learning On Their  Expository Writing Skills unpublished manuscript, 2015 
  87. Fakhir, Z., and Dr. Majid Abdu latif (2015) The Impact of Blended Learning on the Achievement  of the English Language Students and their Attitudes towards it. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment  of the requirements for the Master’s Degree in English Language and Literature Department of English  Language and Literature Faculty of Arts and Sciences Middle East University 
  88. Natera, K. D.. (2013). The shift from face-to-face to blended learning in Philippine secondary  schools : implications to pedagogy and policy. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong  Kong SAR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b5055912 
  89. Nelson, L.S. (2010). Learning outcomes of webinar versus classroom instruction among  baccalaureate nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses,  College of Nursing, Denton, Texas. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11274/287. 
  90. Norberg, A. (2017). From blended learning to learning on life: ICTs, time and access in higher  education (Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University). 
  91. Murphy, C. J. (2017). Role of the Principal in Implementing Blended Learning in Algebra I  Courses in South Carolina Public Schools. (Doctoral dissertation).  
  92. Sandlin, Carter, (2013). "An Analysis of Online Training: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and  Implementation Methods in a Corporate Environment." Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 57.  https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/57
  93. Simon Krisztiá (2016). Blending Is Trending: Applying Blended Learning To Meet Efl Students’  Language Needs In Listening And Speaking Skills Development. Doctoral Program in English Applied  Linguistics and TEFL/TESOL Doctoral School in Linguistics Faculty of Humanities University of Pécs 
  94. Tupas, Fernan Peniero, and Laguda, Marilyn Linas (2020). Blended Learning – An Approach in  Philippine Basic Education Curriculum in New Normal: A Review of Current Literature  
  95. Turpin, C. (2018). Blended Learning and Its Effect on Student Achievement: An Action Research  Study. (Doctoral dissertation). 
  96. Anna Rosario Malindog-Uy (2020). “Blended Learning” In Virus-Hit Philippines”  https://theaseanpost.com/article/blended-learning-virus-hit-philippines 
  97. Centre for Digital Education’s (CDE) 2015 https://www.pearson.com/uk/educators/fe-college educators/btec-blog/2020/09/introducing-blended-learning-in-the-new-normal.html 
  98. Distance Learning Theories- Equivalency Theory https://nicolemeredith.wordpress.com/educ 6135/distance-learning-theories-equivalency-theory/ 
  99. Draffan E. A., & Rainger, P. (2016) A model for the identification of challenges to blended  learning https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760500479787 Research in Learning Technology Volume 14,  2006 - Issue 1 
  100. Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D. et al. Blended learning: the new normal and emerging  technologies. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 15, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/implementation 
  101. http://kidfriendlyky.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/FINAL_MASTER 
  102. 2014_0814_InstructionalDeliveryOverview.pdf 
  103. https://designteachengage.wisc.edu/instructional 
  104. materials/#:~:text=Instructional%20materials%20are%20the%20content,other%20resources%20in%20a %20course. 
  105. https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/07/24/supplements/blended-learning-is-the-new-normal-in-philippine education/744913/ Norberg et al. 2011 
  106. https://www.depedquezon.com.ph/data/schools/pubsec4 
  107. https://www.teacherph.com/deped-learning-delivery-modalities/ 
  108. https://cnnphilippines.com/news/2020/8/12/DepEd-interim-guidelines-on-assessment-grading- .html?fbclid=IwAR2g6ztQuPFvHGe5LubKc5UERST8HlmXHc1l4FjnS_j23LSg-SdUnwYv8lc 
  109. https://www.deped.gov.ph/about-deped/vision-mission-core-values-and-mandate/ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/ 
  110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38021465_A_theory_of_organizational_readiness_to_change 
  111. https://education-blog.williamwoods.edu/2020/05/how-teachers-are-coping-with-online-education technology/ 
  112. https://www.mindful.org/mindfulness-in-education/
  113. Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On  the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111163913.  
  114. https://hundred-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/report/file/15/hundred_spotlight_covid-19_digital.pdf 
  115. Retrieved from. Quinones Melinda T. (2020). DepEd clarifies blended, distance learning  modalities for SY 2020-2021. Philippine Information Agency. https://pia.gov.ph/news/articles/1046619 
  116. Tuominen S., Leponiemi L. A learning experience for us all. Spotlight: Quality education for all  during Covid-19 crisis. OECD/Hundred Research Report #011. 2020. 
  117. https://hundredcdn.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/report/file/15/hundred_spotlight_covid-19_digital.pdf 
  118. Retrieved from. WILICHOWSKI T., & COBO C. (2020). From coping to improving and  accelerating: Supporting teachers in the pandemic and beyond.  
  119. https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/coping-improving-and-accelerating-supporting-teachers pandemic-and-beyond

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic