Grammatical Errors in English Among Grade 8 Students: Basis for Module Development

Renee  A. Lamela,; Joseph  Delos Reyes,

Grammatical Errors in English Among Grade 8 Students: Basis for Module Development

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

Reports show that Filipino students have deteriorating communication skills in the English language. To verify these, it is significant to investigate their communicative competence. Thus, this study was conducted.Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions: 1) What are the common students’ errors in the application of subject–verb agreement rules in English? 2) What are the grammar rules that are mastered and those that are not? 3) What interventions can be done to enhance the performance of Grade 8 students in the least mastered grammar rules?The study used a descriptive-evaluative research design. The students were given a diagnostic test composed of 90-item multiple-choice questions about 18 subject–verb agreement rules in sentences, where each rule was represented by five questions. The grammatical errors made by the students were determined based on the number of correct responses in each rule. The top most common grammatical errors, the mastered and unmastered rules were identified.The respondents were 291 randomly selected Grade 8 students from secondary schools in Milagros, Masbate. The selection of sample respondents was done using stratified random sampling. Based on the result of the diagnostic examination, the following were the findings: 1) The Grade 8 students’score in each of the 18 rules was below the mastery level of 75% and it shows low level of mastery of all the rules in subject-verb agreement. 2) Students got a near mastery level score in only one out of 18 rules and it deals with mathematical abstractions.Based on the findings, the conclusion was drawn: 1) Grade 8 students in Milagros, Masbate involved in this study have very poor performance in subject- verb agreement rules.Based on conclusion, the researcher recommended the following: 1) Grammar rules must be given enough time. 2) Devise a learning module targeting the identified errors to master the rules.

References:

Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Eastman, C. M. (2008). "Grammar." Microsoft® Student 2009 [DVD]. Redmond, WA:
Microsoft Corporation. ------.(1984). Writing: Research, theory, and application. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.
Corder, S.P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arani, M.T. (1986). Error analysis: The types and causes of the major structural errors made by Iranian university students when writing expository and imaginative prose. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo.
Ghadessy, M. (1980). Implications of error analysis for second/foreign language acquisition. IRAL, 18: 93-101.
Richards, J.C., & Sampson, G.P. (1974). The study of learner English. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 3-18). New York: Longman.
Goldrick, M., & Daland, R. (2009). Errors and phonological grammars: Insights from Harmonic Grammar networks. Phonology, 26(1), 147–185. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675709001742
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
Nazari, A., & Allahyar, N. (2012). Grammar Teaching Revisited: EFL Teachers between Grammar Abstinence and Formal Grammar Teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 73–87. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n2.6
Olsen, S. (1999). Errors and compensatory strategies: A study of grammar and vocabulary in texts written by Norwegian learners of English. System, 27, 191–205. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00016-0
Rozovskaya, A., & Roth, D. (2010). Training Paradigms for Correcting Errors in Grammar and Usage. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (June), 154–162. Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N/N10/N10-1018
Ting, S. H., Mahadhir, M., & Chang, S. L. (2010). Grammatical errors in spoken English of university students in oral communication course. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 10(1), 53–69.
Nayan, S. (2009). A Study of subject-verb agreement: From novice writers to expert writers. International Education Studies, 2(3), 190-194.
Stapa, S. H., & Izahar, M. M. (2010). Analysis of errors in subject-verb agreement among Malaysian ESL learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 16(1), 56-73.
Mohamed, A. R., Lian, G. L., & Eliza, W. R. (2004). English erros and Chinese learners. Sunway College Journal, 1, 83–97.
Lasala, C. B. (May, 2014). Communicative competence of secondary senior students: Language instructional pocket. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 226–237.
Soliven, P. S. (September, 2015). Our government school reforms can work if… Online newspaper article. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com/education-and-home/2015/09/24/1503201/our-government-school-reforms-can-work-if...
Tormes, M. H. (2008). English anguish. Health & Home, 49(5), 33-35.
Richards, J.C., & Sampson, G.P. (1974). The study of learner English. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 3-18). New York: Longman.