Traversing the Setbacks to Digital Politics and E-Democracy in the Philippines: An Analysis of Political Exposure, Engagement, and Integrity
Princesita Timonera | Jether Banquerigo | Mary Claire Arabejo | Rosebelt Lomocso | Maria Lee Bambi Hosana | Almira Boniel | Sidney Marie Bernales | Analou Amor | Eduard Catapusan | Patrick Boniao
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study explores the intricate relationships between demographic profiles and perceptions of digital politics,
e-democracy, and related aspects. A sample of 640 participants from diverse backgrounds in the Visayas and
Mindanao regions of the Philippines was surveyed, encompassing age, gender, educational level, employment
status, monthly household income, and residential area. Correlation analysis unveiled significant associations
between these variables and participants' perceptions of setbacks, political exposure, engagement, and integrity.
Age exhibited correlations with educational level and employment status, suggesting that younger individuals
tend to possess higher educational achievements and are less likely to be employed full-time. Gender correlated
with increased political engagement among female participants, hinting at differing inclinations toward political
activities. Educational level emerged as a significant factor in participants' perspectives on exposure,
employment status, and income, highlighting its impact on nuanced political perceptions. No substantial
correlations were found between residential area and other variables, indicating that geographical location may
not strongly influence political perspectives in the digital age. However, correlations underscored age's potential
influence on perceptions of digital political and e-democracy-related setbacks. This research enhances
understanding of how demographic factors intersect with perceptions of digital politics and e-democracy,
providing insights for policymakers and practitioners to design tailored strategies for informed and inclusive
political engagement. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse on digital democracy, underscoring the
importance of continued investigation into the dynamic interplay of demographics and political perceptions in
the evolving digital landscape.
References:
- Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365-388.
- Boulianne, S. (2019). Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-analysis of Current Research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(17), 2547-2565.
- Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press.
- DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.
- Garcia, S. M. (2019). Political exposure and political knowledge on the web. New Media & Society, 21(8), 1747-1766.
- Garcia, C. D. (2019). E-Democracy and Political Exposure: An Analysis of Social Media Engagement. Political Studies Quarterly, 38(4), 567-584.
- Gibson, R. K., Margolis, M. F., Resnick, A., & Ward, S. (2020). Voter Turnout among Youth: An Analysis of the Voting Gap between Young and Old in Cross-National Perspective. Electoral Studies, 69, 102186.
- Hernandez, J. F. (2021). Integrity in Politics: Ethical Considerations in the Age of ICTs. Journal of Ethics in Governance, 25(1), 89-107.
- Hernandez, L. (2021). Political integrity in the digital age. International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 206-211.
- Leshner, G., & Walther, J. B. (2020). Digital Deception: An Investigation into the Strategies of Deceptive Impression Management. Communication Research, 47(3), 323-342.
- Musiał-Karg, M.. (2018, June 21). The Election Silence in contemporary democracies. Questions about the sense of election silence in the Age of Internet. https://scite.ai/reports/10.14746/pp.2013.18.3.8
- Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, A. B. (2020). Digital Democracy: Exploring the Impact of ICTs on Political Engagement. Journal of Communication and Society, 15(2), 123-140.
- Smith, A. (2020). The internet and politics: Challenges and opportunities. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 27-43). Oxford University Press.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.
- Tan, L. H. (2017). The Digital Transformation of Democracy: Impact of ICTs on Political Processes. Information and Society Review, 29(3), 321-339.
- Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., ... & Tucker, J. A. (2013). Political Expression and Action on Social Media: Exploring the Relationship between Lower- and Higher-Threshold Political Activities Among Twitter Users in Italy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 971-988.
- Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729-747.
- Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Stories Increases Perceived Accuracy of Stories Without Warnings. Management Science, 68(3), 9-10.
Philippine E-Journals
