HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 14 no. 6 (2023)

YouTube Tutorials: A Classroom Reinforcement to the Students’ English Language Proficiency

Apritch Honey Cinco | Arnel Pradia | Leonel Untong

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to assess the impact of YouTube Tutorials as a classroom reinforcement tool on Grade 7 students' English Language Proficiency during the 2022-2023 academic year. It sought answers to questions regarding students' language proficiency levels before and after watching YouTube Tutorials in morphology, phonology, semantics, and syntax, as well as the overall improvement in English competence. The study employed a mixed-method research approach with 54 respondents, utilizing a self-made survey questionnaire.The findings revealed that students initially had fair to poor proficiency levels in various language areas, which significantly improved after exposure to YouTube Tutorials. The mean differences demonstrated a substantial increase in English competence, with a p-value of 0.000*, indicating statistical significance. YouTube Tutorials were found to reinforce learning by enhancing comprehension, problem-solving, and advanced study. It also contributed to broader knowledge acquisition, creativity, and improved language skills. In conclusion, YouTube Tutorials proved effective in enhancing English language proficiency among Grade 7 students. Recommendations included considering YouTube Tutorials as a reinforcement tool for English teachers, providing classroom technology, encouraging parental support, and emphasizing the importance of quality video content. Further research in different contexts and with diverse respondents was suggested for result validation.



References:

  1. Alimemaj, Z., 2010. Youtube, language learning and teaching techniques. AngloHigher, 2 (3), pp.10-12.
  2. Al-Masri, H. (2004). Semantics and Cultural Losses in the Translation of Literary Texts, unpublished PhD thesis: Purdue University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1216998.pdf
  3. Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2013). Contributions of individual differences and contextual variables to reading achievement of english language learners: An empirical investigation using hierarchical linear modeling. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 323–351. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267794
  4. Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (1996). Introduction to research in education. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace College.
  5. Babayigit, Selma & Shapiro, Laura. (2019). Component skills that underpin listening comprehension and reading comprehension in learners with English as first and additional language: Listening and reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading. 43. 10.1111/1467-9817.12291.
  6. Beeninga, Jane, "The Study of Morphological Awareness for English Learners" (2022). Dissertations, Theses, and Projects. 665.
  7. Belletti A, Bennati E, Sorace A (2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–89.
  8. Birsh, J. R. (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brooks
  9. Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal ,23,515–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z
  10. Borgonovo, Emanuele. (2006). Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches. Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis. 26. 1349-61. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00806.
  11. Carlisle J. F., Fleming J., Gudbrandsen B. (2000). Incidental word learning in science classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 184–211.
  12. Castles, et. al (2003) How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks? https://www.researchgate.net/profile/VirginiaHolmes/publication/10760740_How_does_orthographic_knowledge_influence_performance_on_phonological_awareness_tasks/links/00b49529696bad27e9000000/How-does-orthographic-knowledge-influence-performance- on-phonological-awareness-tasks.pdf
  13. Chan's, C. (2019) Investigation of the communication needs of Hong Kong business professionals: Significance for the field of ESP and further implications for research and practice. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490623000170
  14. Chenail, J. S., & Chenail, R. J. (2011). Communicating qualitative analytical results following Grice’s conversational maxims. The Qualitative Report,16(1), 276- 285. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-1/grice.pdf
  15. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  16. Comac, L., 2008. Using audioblogs to assist English language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21 (2), pp.181-198
  17. Crosson, A. C., McKeown, M. G., Moore, D. W., & Ye, F. (2019). Extending the bounds of morphology instruction: Teaching latin roots facilitates academic word learning for English learner adolescents. In Grantee Submission. Grantee Submission. https://web-b-ebscohost-com.trmproxy.mnpals.net/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&sid=b9b9bdf3-c948-4ead-83f6-8d87547ad067%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
  18. Davidson, S.J. and O'Connor, R.E. (2019), An intervention using morphology to derive word meanings for English language learners. Jnl of Applied Behav Analysis, 52: 394 - 407. https://doi-org.trmproxy.mnpals.net/10.1002/jaba.539
  19. Dean, M., 2008. Youtube. New York: O’Reilly
  20. Deacon, S. H., Francis, K., & Tong, X. (2017). The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 1–16.
  21. Derewianka, B., 2008. Venturing beyond Youtube. TESOL in Context, 18 (2), pp.42-72
  22. Ferraris, A., Mazzoleni, A., Devalle, A. and Couturier, J. (2019) Big  Data Analytics Capabilities and Knowledge Management: Impact on Firm Performance. Management Decision, 57, 1923-1936.
  23. Filippini, A. L., Gerber, M. M., & Leafstedt, J. M. (2012). A vocabulary-added reading intervention for English learners at-risk of reading difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 27(3), 14–26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001055.pdf
  24. Ghasemi, B., 2011. Utube and language learning. Procedia, 28, pp.63-67 House of Commons, 2007. New Media and Creative Industries. Westminster: TSO
  25. Goodwin A. P., Ahn S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological  interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school- age children. Scientific Studies of Reading
  26. Goodwin, A. P. & Perkins, J. (2015). Word detectives: Morphological instruction that supports academic language. The Reading Teacher, 68(7), 510–523.
  27. Hamdi, S. (2016). An analysis of lexical errors in the English compositions of EFL Tunisian learners. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926, 2(4), 643-652.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610509.pdf
  28. Hamka, Punaji Setyosari, Bambang Yudi Cahyono , Sulton, 2020. Learning English Phonology on English Language Education Study Program State Universities in Malang. pp. 194-195
  29. Hopp, Wallace & Spearman, Mark. (2004). To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 6. 133-148. 10.1287/msom.1030.0028.
  30. Iftikhar, M., Riaz, S., & Yousaf, Z. (2019). Impact of YouTube tutorials in skill development among university students Pakistan Jou rnal of Distance and Online Learning, 5(2), 125-138. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1266671.pdf
  31. Jarvis, H., 2004. Investigating classroom applications of computers on EFL courses at Higher Education institutions in the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3 (2), pp.111-137
  32. Jones, Troy & Cuthrell, Kristen. (2011). YouTube: Educational Potentials and Pitfalls. Computers in the Schools. 28. 75-85. 10.1080/07380569.2011.553149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232914028_YouTube_Educational_Potentials_and_Pitfalls
  33. Juma, M. J. (2021). Developing English Pronunciation through Animation and YouTube Videos. Arab World English Journal, 12 (4) 142-152. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1340287
  34. Kieffer M. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 44–53.
  35. Kieffer, M. J., & Box, C. D. (2013). Derivational morphological awareness, academic vocabulary, and reading comprehension in linguistically diverse sixth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 168–175.
  36. Kieffer M. J., Lesaux N. K. (2012). Development of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in Spanish-speaking language minority learners: A parallel process latent growth curve model. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 23–54.
  37. Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenburg, L., Wade- Woolley, L., & Parrilla, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 389– 410.
  38. Kruk, R. S., & Bergman, K. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(1), 10–34.
  39. Kitchenham, M., 2011. Innovative techniques in instruction technology, E-learning, E-assessment and education. New York: Springer
  40. Kuo L. J., & Anderson R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.
  41. Levesque, K., Kieffer, M., & Deacon, S. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 1–20.
  42. Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2016). Relative effectiveness of phonological and morphological awareness training on L2 word reading in EFL children. System, 60, 93-104.
  43. Lonigan, C. J., & Goodrich, J. M. (2018). Identifying differences in early literacy skills across subgroups of language-minority children: A latent profile Loanalysis. Developmental Psychology, 54(4), 631-647.d, G., 2009. The next generation. London: Routledge
  44. Lozano, R. (2006) Incorporation and Institutionalization of SD into Universities: Breaking through Barriers to Change. Journal of C l e a n e r P r o d u c t i o n , 1 4 , 787-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.010
  45. McMahon, W.W. (2002) Education and Development: Measuring the Social Benefits. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
  46. Muico, Earl Jones. (2021). YOUTUBE VIDEO UTILIZATION TO ENHANCE THE STUDENTS GRAMMATICAL COMPETENCE. 10.6084/m9.figshare.19224792.v1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356830596_YOUTUBE_VIDEO_UTILIZATION_TO_ENHANCE_THE_STUDENTS_GRAMMATICAL_COMPETENCE
  47. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304– 330. doi:10.2307/747823
  48. Nagy W., Berninger V., Abbott R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
  49. Nejati, M., 2010. Annals of language and learning. London: Universal
  50. Ngene, Patrick. & Jeptarus, Kipsamo, (2016). Lexico–Semantic Errors of the Learners of English: A Survey of Standard Seven Keiyo– Speaking Primary School Pupils in Keiyo District, Kenya https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102824.pdf
  51. Nielsen, K., 2010. Experiences obtained with integration of student response systems for ipod touch and iphone into e-learning environments. Journal of E-learning, 8 (2), pp.179-190
  52. Paulsen, J., 2001. New era trends and technologies in foreign language learning. http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2001/1/05/ Accessed 11/05/2013
  53. Nurhayat, Dwi Astuti Wahyu, 2022. The Students’ Responses on Learning English Phonology Deploying Scaffolding: How does This Technique Support Higher Linguistics Stages? https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1364961.pdf
  54. Pizo, Erin Kathreen (2018). The Effect of Morphology Instruction on Performance Growth of Seventh-Grade Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2981&context=doctoral
  55. Quintero, Nicole & Mcintyre, Laura. (2011). Kindergarten Transition Preparation: A Comparison of Teacher and Parent Practices for Children with Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal. 38. 411-420. 10.1007/s10643-010-0427-8.
  56. Reed, D. K., Petscher, Y., & Foorman, B. R. (2016). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and spelling to the reading comprehension of adolescents who are and are not English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(4), 6 3 3 – 6 5 7 . https://web-b-ebscohost.com.trmproxy.mnpals.net/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=a834edb3-85e3-4971-b347-d67fce030d2d%40sessionmgr10
  57. Reid, D., 2010. iPod, iPhone and now iPad. World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp.2862-2864
  58. Rennie, F., 2012. E-Learning and Social Networking Handbook. London: Routledge
  59. Richards-Tutor, C., Baker, D. L., Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., & Smith, J. M. (2016). The Effectiveness of reading interventions for english learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 144–169. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589017.pdf
  60. Roach, P. (2009) English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. 4th Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  61. Russak, S. (2013) How can a fine-grained analysis of spelling errors inform our understanding of the development of spelling in EFL?, Written Language & LiteracyWritten Language and Literacy, 10.1075/wll.00061.rus, 25, 1, (67-98)
  62. Sarwat, Samina et. al (2021) Problems and Factors affecting students English writing skill sat elementary level. https://www.ilkogretim-online.org/fulltext/218-1615999805.pdf
  63. Sherer, Pamela & Shea, Timothy. (2011). Using Online Video to Support Student Learning and Engagement. College Teaching. 59. 5 6 - 5 9 . 10.1080/87567555.2010.511313. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232884944_Using_Online_Video_to_Support_Student_Learning_and_Engagement
  64. Short, D. J., Fidelman, C. G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in english language learners through sheltered in stru ction . TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 334–361. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41576050
  65. Sibold, C. (2011). Building English language learners’ academic vocabulary: Strategies and tips.Multicultural Education, 18(2), 24– 28. https://web-b-ebscohostcom.trmproxy.mnpals.net/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=985c3e31-fe0c-4876-8f3e-691adffab4d8%40sessionmgr102
  66. Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Doyle, B., Mitchell, M. A., & Meyer, A. G. (2014). Teachers’ instruction and students’ vocabulary and comprehension: An exploratory study with English monolingual and spanish-english bilingual students in grades 3-5. Reading Research Quarterly, 4 9 ( 1 ) , 31–60. https://doi-org.trmproxy.mnpals.net/10.1002/rrq.63
  67. Sorace, Antonella. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. 265. 10.1075/cilt.265.04sor.
  68. Thompson, Mackenzie (2022) "The Effect of English Language Proficiency on Phonological Awareness Skills Among Second Graders," Journal of Graduate Education Research: Vol. 3 , Article 6.
  69. Tim Bedley Critical Thinkingpt. (2008) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akVmCfUJiQ Wankel, C., 2010. Cutting-edge social media approaches to business education. London: LAP Weinberg, T., 2009. The new community rules. New York: O’Reilly.
  70. Trier, James. (2007). “Cool” Engagements With YouTube: Part 1. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy - j adolesc adult literacy. 50.408-412.10.1598/JAAL.50.5.7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250055715_Cool_Engagements_With_YouTube_Part_1
  71. Townsend, D., Filippini, A., Collins, P., & Biancarosa, G. (2012). Evidence for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/663301
  72. Tsang, Y., & Chen, H. (2013). Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 223–239.
  73. Venezky, Richard l. 1999. The American Way of Spelling: The Structure and Origins of American English Orthography. New York: Guilford Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610509.pdf
  74. Wael Abdulrahman Almurashi, 2016. The Effective Use of Youtube  Videos for Teaching English Language in Classrooms as Supplementary Material at Taibah University in Alula
  75. Wood, C. L., Schatschneider, C., & VelDink, A. (2021). The relation between academic word use and reading comprehension for students from diverse backgrounds. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 5 2 ( 1 ) , 273–287. https://web-b-ebscohost-com.trmproxy.mnpals.net/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=8&sid=b9b9bdf3-c948-4ead-83f6-8d87547ad067%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
  76. Yesil-Dagli, U. (2011). Predicting ELL students’ beginning first grade English oral reading fluency from initial kindergarten vocabulary, letter naming, and phonological awareness skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 15-29.
  77. Zoski, J. L., & Erickson, K. A. (2017). Multicomponent linguistic awareness intervention for atrisk kindergarteners. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(3), 161-171.