HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 13 no. 7 (2023)

Learning Modalities Utilization Perceived Effectiveness and Academic Performance of Key Stage 2 Learners

Andrea Carmona

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to describe the learning modalities utilization in relation to their perceived effectiveness and to the academic performance of the key stage 2 learner respondents in Sinalac Elementary School Initao South District, Misamis Oriental. Employing the explanatory-correlational research design, with the stratified sampling, a total of 61 Key stage 2 learners were involved as respondents in this study. The data were gathered using an adapted questionnaire with modification. Overall, the learning modalities studied were poorly utilized, except the self-learning kit printed copy modules which were averagely used. In general, the overall mean perceived effectiveness of distance learning utilization modalities average. At an integrated level the positiveoriented effectiveness was described as higher than the negative-oriented perceived effectiveness. In terms of academic performance, the respondents achieved an aggregate satisfactory performance level. It was only the online power point presentation that was significantly correlated to the perceived positive-oriented modalities effectiveness. With respect to the negative-oriented learning modalities effectiveness. Three learning modalities used yielded significant correlation with perceived effectiveness: soft copy modules. DepEd TV-based instruction and online powerpoint presentation. Moreover, only online powerpoint presentation was significantly correlated with both its positive-oriented and negative-oriented perceived effectiveness levels. Significant relationship between the utilization level of soft copy modules was significantly related to their negativeoriented perceived effectiveness. Too, the Deped TV-based instruction was significantly related to its perceived negative-oriented effectiveness. The soft copy and powerpoint presentation were significantly associated to the academic performance of the respondents.



References:

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory Prentice Hall 1977. 247 pp.,Paperbound. Group & Organization Studies, 2(3), 384-385.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: Freeman. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co
  3. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  4. Bayraktar, H. V. (2015). Student motivation in classroom management and factors that affect motivation. Turkish Studies International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10 (3), 1079-1100
  5. Bernardo, J. (2020). DepEd eyes blending online, classroom learning for the next school year. ABS-CBN News, Sgt. Esguerra Ave.,Diliman, Quezon City 1103 Metro Manila.
  6. Benjamin, A. (2011). Factors influencing learning. Noba (n.d). Factors Influencing
    1. Learning. /Benjamin_Book_Chapter_2014.pdf
  7. Cabual, R. A. (2021). Learning styles and preferred learning modalities in the new normal. OALib, 08(04), 1–14
  8. CHED. (2020). Ched Covid-19 Advisory No. 3. Proclamation No. 922 series of 2020,
  9. Higher Education Development Center Building, C.P. Garcia Ave., U.P. Campus,
    1. Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
  10. Chen, J. F., & Huang, H. F. (2018). An empirical study on the factors influencing the web-based teaching effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1635–1643.
  11. Cheng, C. M & Abu Bakar, M. B. (2017). The impact of using modules in the teaching and learning of english in malaysian polytechnics: An analysis of the views and perceptions of english language teaching
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson. - References - Scientific Research Publishing, 2012)
  13. Codamon, D. (2021). Undestanding the distance learning modalities. Philippine Information Agency, Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, 1128 Metro Manila
  14. Covid – 19 World Health Organization Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Reports. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review. Journal of Infection and Public Health,13(5), 667-673.
  15. Department of Education. K to 12 Basic Education Program (2012) DepEd Order No. 021 s. 2019 K to 12 Basic Education Program, DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue Pasig City 1600
  16. DepEd. (2020). DepEd Memorandum (DM) 54, s. 2020, Official Statement Department of Education. Deped Complex, Meralco Avenue Pasig City 1600
  17. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1, 1017 Scientific Research Publishing.
  18. Distance Learning. Rotas, E. E., & Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Difficulties in remote learning: Voices of Philippine university students in the wake of COVID-19 crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education
  19. Epstein, J. L., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181–193.
  20. Er, E., Özden, M., & Arifoglu, A. (2009). A blended e-learning environment: A model proposition for integration of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(2), pp. 449-460.
  21. Erickson, E. E. (1978). Comments. Behavior Science Research, 13(1) Behavior Science Research, Volume: 13 issue: 1, page(s): 26-32
  22. Fleming, N.D. (2005). VARK: a guide to learning styles. http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Helping Students Understand How They Learn. The Teaching Professor, 7(4).
  23. Gardner, H. (1994). Intelligence in theory and practice: A response to Elliot W. Eisner, Robert J. Sternberg, and Henry M. Levin. Teachers College Record, 95, 576-583.
  24. Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S., & Habeshaw, T. (1989). Preparing to teach.Technical Educational Services Ltd.
  25. Gonzales, E. E. (n.d.). A modular approach utilizing decision tree in teaching integration techniques in Calculus. 
  26. Hastie, M., Hung, I.., Nian-Shing C, & Kinshuk. (2010, February). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration.
  27. Hannum, W., Irvin, M. J., Pui-Wa Lei, & Farmer, T. W. (2008, December). Effectiveness of using learner-centered principles on student retention in distance education courses in rural schools: Distance Education, 29, 211 – 229.
  28. Hoffman, Powell, Copper 2014 SI. (2014). The circle of security intervention: Enhancing attachment in early parent-child relationships.
  29. Hoover‐Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C. L., Wilkins,A.S.,& Closson, K. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105–130.
  30. Irvin et al.,2010M.J. Irvin, W.H. Hannum, C. de la Varre, T.W. Farmer Barriers to distance education in rural schools. Rev. Dist. Educ., 11 (2) (2010), pp. 73-78
  31. Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. O. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students’ anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951–960.
  32. Kalelioglu, F. (2017). Using Facebook as a Learning Management System: Experiences of pre-service teachers. informatics in education, 16(1), 83–101.
  33. Kay, P. J., Fitzgerald, M., Paradee, C., & Mellencamp, A. (1994). Makinghomework work at  home:  The  parent’s  perspective.Journal  ofLearning Disabilities, 27, 550–561. (PDF) Parental Involvement in Homework.
  34. New Normal Education Hew, K.F., Jia, C., Gonda, D.E. et al. Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. 
  35. Malipot, M., (2020). Government urged to uplift wellbeing of teachers.E-Net Philippines. (2020). Sciepub.com
  36. Mapp, K. L. 2012. “Family engagement capacity building framework (Draft).” Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation, and Improvement.
  37. Mean-Chin (2020) Students new normal: modular Distance Learning. Unique Philippines. Metro Manila Philippines.
  38. McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1996). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology A project of the association for educational communications and technology
  39. Moallem, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy, and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3 (3). 55-77.
  40. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education A systems view. Scientific Research Publishing
  41. Okoro, C. (2016) Teachers’ understanding and use of thematic approach in teaching and learning of Social studies in Rivers State. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 4(3), 64–69.
  42. Pascua, A. (2021). The Proper used of DepEd Radio, TV-based and Online Modality. Department of Education Central Office, Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
  43. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference A review of contemporary Research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education.- Scientific Research Publishing
  44. Ramos, A. J., Nangit, G., Ranga, A. I., & Triñona, J. (2007). ICT-enabled distance education in community development in the Philippines. Dis. Educ. 28, 213–229.
  45. Rogers, R. (1975). Protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93 – 114.
  46. Seipal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. International Journal for Research in Education, volume 2, p.
  47. Shalk, A. (2002). A study of the relationship between multiple intelligences and achievement as measured by Delaware student testing program (DSTP) scores in reading, mathematics, and writing Ed.D.
  48. Shank, P. (2020, April 3). (The Right) learning modalities to deliver digital learning: Part 1. ELearning Industry; eLearning Industry.
  49. Silver, H., Strong, R.& Perini, M. (2000). So, each may learn. integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development., 2016)
  50. Simonson, M. (2019). Research in distance education: A summary. Quarterly. Distance education research: a review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 124-142.
  51. Su, B., Bonk, C., Magjuka, R., Liu, X., & Lee, S.-H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning
  52. Thorndike, E.L. (1913). Education psychology briefer course. References - Scientific Research Publishing.
  53. Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine Context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).
  54. Unicef.org.www.unicef.org/philippines/education Education. (2020) Wieland, Niko Chief of Communication Unicef Philippines
  55. Vahey, P., & Jim Vanides,(November 2020) Technology’s role in the next new normal in education. SRI International Published
  56. Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181–193. 
  57. Ventayin, R. J. (2018). Teachers’ readiness in online teaching environment: A case of department of education teachers. Journal of Education, Management and Social Sciences, 2 (1).
  58. Vygotsky, L. (1968) Social constructivism mind in society. Harvard University Press.
  59. Wenner, J.M. Burn, & H.E. Baer. (2011). The math you need, when you need It: Online modules that remediate mathematical skills in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 16–24.
  60. Winthrop, R. (2020, April 10). Top 10 risks and opportunities for education in the face of COVID-19. The Brookings Institution, April 10