Pupils&rsquo; Performance in Blended Learning and Face-To-Face Learning Modality Towards a Proposed Learning Continuity Plan

Pejay  Sasotona,

Pupils’ Performance in Blended Learning and Face-To-Face Learning Modality Towards a Proposed Learning Continuity Plan

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

This study determined the level of performance of grade six pupils in the blended learning and face to-face learning modality in the selected school of Cluster 1 in the Division of Pasig City during the 1st and 2nd quarter of the school year 2022 - 2023.The study used a descriptive research design. The participants in the study were 36 teachers and 269 enrolled elementary pupils from three schools who were randomly selected for the study. Pearson r, correlated t-test, Chi-square test, and z-test were used to measure the degree of relationship between the selected profile factors and the level of performance of grade six pupils in blended and face-to-face learning modalities. The findings showed that There is no significant difference between the perception of the two group of respondents and the level of performance of grade six pupils in terms of written works and quarterly assessment, while there is a significant difference on their perception in terms of performance task. Likewise, there is a significant difference in the level of performance of grade six pupils in the blended learning and faceto-face learning modalities with respect to written works, performance tasks and quarterly assessment. Lastly, there is a significant relationship between pupils’ interest and the level of performance in terms of the said aspects.

References:

“DepEd Data Bits.” Learning Delivery Modalities SY 2021-2022, https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/7-Databits-Learning-Delivery-Modalities-Jul.pdf . Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.
Jones, Sarah. “The Implications of Blended Learning in Today’s Classroom: A Look into the History, Views, Impacts, and Research.” NW Commons, 2019, https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/180/ .
Kintu, Mugenyi Justice, et al. “Blended Learning Effectiveness: The Relationship between Student Characteristics, Design Features and Outcomes | International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | Full Text.” SpringerOpen, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education volume 14, 2017, https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 .
Naba, Paula. “What Is Blended Learning.” Northpass.com, 4 Feb. 2022, www.northpass.com/blog/what-is-blended-learning-types-examples-everything-else . Accessed 19 Oct. 2022.
Nguyen, S. (2021, September 23). Online Learning vs. Face-to-Face Learning: Which Is Best? The Whatfix Blog | Drive Digital Adoption. https://whatfix.com/blog/online-learning-vs-face-to-face-learning/ .
Nortvig, Anne-Mette, et al. “A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement Electronic Journal of e-Learning.” Https://Academic-Publishing.Org/Index.Php , The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2018, https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1855 .
Shah, R. (2022, March 1). Face-to-face Learning: Benefits, Advantages and Disadvantages. Bench Partner. https://benchpartner.com/blog/face-to-face-learning-benefits-advantages-and-disadvantages .
Singh, Harvey. “Building Effective Blended Learning Programs: Education Book Chapter | IGI Global.” IGI Global: International Academic Publisher, https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/building-effective-blended-learning-programs/277742 . Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.
Villanueva, J. A., Redmond, P., & Galligan, L. (2022). Manifestations of Cognitive Presence in Blended Learning Classes of the Philippine K—12 System. Online Learning, 26(1), 19-37. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.302