HomeMabini Review Journalvol. 11 no. 1 (2022)

Durkheim Revisited: Possible Contribution to the Understanding of Gramsci’s Notion of Hegemony

Artchil Fernandez

Discipline: Cultural Studies

 

Abstract:

The paper attempts to explore the possibility of using Durkheim to understand the Gramscian notion of hegemony building on the claim that Gramsci’s idea is fragmentary and contentious. Durkheim’s concepts such as social solidarity, integration, rites and collective conscience the paper argues maybe deployed to comprehend Gramsci’s notion of hegemony particularly consent generation. The paper also contends that Durkheim’s ideas on the state and secondary groups/voluntary organizations (civil society) may be helpful in explaining the Gramscian concept of consent building. In effect, the paper also tries to demonstrate that sociological positions that are viewed as rivals can complement each other. Sociologists should do more explorations in areas of convergence rather than divergence of sociological positions.



References:

  1. Anderson, Perry. 2017. The H-Word: The Peripeteia of Hegemony, Verso.
  2. Bonanno, Alessandro. 2017. The Legitimation Crisis of Neoliberalism: The State, Will Formation and Resistance, Palgrave Macmillan. Buttigieg, Joseph. 1995. Gramsci on Civil Society. Boundary 2, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1-32.
  3. Burawoy, Michael. 1982. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism, Chicago University Press.
  4. Caperchi, Giulio Amerigo. 1992. Occupy Hegemony: Gramsci, Ideology and Common Sense. Retrieved October 16, 2020. https://thegocblog.com/2012/04/07/occupy-hegemony-gramsciideology-and-common-sense/
  5. Durkheim, Emile. 1950. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, Translated by Cornelia Brookefield. The Free Press.
  6. Durkheim, Emile. 1960. The Division of Labor in Society, Translated by George Simpson. The Free Press.
  7. Durkheim, Emile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Translated by Karen Fields. The Free Press.
  8. Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1996. Useful Durkheim. Sociological Theory 14.2,109-130.
  9. Femia, Joseph. 1973. Hegemony and Consciousness in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci. Political Studies, Vol XXIII, No.1 (29-48).
  10. Gamson, William. 1992. The Social Psychology of Collective Action, 53– 76, in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Aldon
  11. Morris and Carol McClurg Muller, Yale University Press. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks,International Publishers.
  12. Gramsci, Antonio. 1978. Some Aspects of the Southern Question, Selections from Political Writings (1921-1926), translated and edited by Quintin Hoare, Lawrence and Wishart, London.
  13. Maglaras, Vasilis. 2013. Consent and Submission: Aspects of Gramsci’s Theory of the Political and Civil Society. Sage Open January - March, 1-8.
  14. Reviewing Burawoy - The labour process as a balance of enforcementand consent, hazelsapien.blogspot, Retrieved September 20,2019 https://hazelsapien.blogspot.com/2013/07/reviewingburawoy-labour-process-as.html
  15. Rodriguez-Muñiz, Michael. 2017. Cultivating consent: nonstate leaders and the orchestration of state legibility. American Journal of Sociology 123. 2, 385-425.
  16. Thomas, Peter. 2013. Hegemony, passive revolution and the modern Prince. Thesis Eleven 117, 20-39.
  17. Tuckman, Alan and Michael Whitehall. 2002. Affirmation, games, and insecurity: Cultivating consent within a new workplace regime. Class and Capital 76, 65-93.