Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 14 no. 7 (2023)

Teaching Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Challenges with the Blended Instruction of English Teachers

Joharra Calyawa | Doreen Tampus

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research study examined the teaching competence, self-efficacy, and challenges experienced by English teachers in blended instruction. The research questions focused on assessing teaching competence from the perspectives of students and administrators, examining the level of self-efficacy among English teachers, exploring the relationship between teaching competence and self-efficacy, and identifying the challenges teachers face in blended learning. The study employed a descriptive-correlational approach, analyzing data collected through survey questionnaires administered to 43 English teachers, 289 students, and ten administrators in five public secondary schools. As students and administrators reported, English teachers demonstrated high teaching competence. Similarly, the self-efficacy of English teachers in blended instruction was found to be consistently high across various indicators. However, the study did not find a significant relationship between teaching competence and self-efficacy, suggesting that other factors influence a teacher's effectiveness in the classroom. Furthermore, the research identified challenges, such as resource limitations, classroom management issues, and low student motivation, that need to be addressed to enhance the effectiveness of blended instruction—professional development opportunities, mentorship programs, addressing teachers' challenges, and involving policymakers in curriculum development. Future research could consider incorporating demographic factors to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the participants. The study contributes to understanding teaching competence, self-efficacy, and challenges in blended instruction, providing insights for teacher training and support programs.



References:

  1. Abbas, Z. I. (2018). Blended learning and student satisfaction: Aninvestigation into an EAP writing course. Advances in Languageand Literary Studies, 9(1), 102-105.
  2. Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emergency remote teaching in thecoronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning inMedical Sciences, 11(2), 135-137.
  3. Alagao, R. A., Barrido, E. S., & Lagumbay, J. C. (2020). Predictorsof Academic Success in Elementary Schools in the Philippines. AsiaPacific Journal of Education, 40(1), 19-30.
  4. Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. (2019). The Effectof Blended Learning on the Achievement of Ninth Grade Students inScience and Their Attitudes towards its Use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424
  5. Alvarez Jr, A. V. (2020). Learning from the Problems andChallenges in Blended Learning: Basis for Faculty Development andProgram Enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2),112-132.
  6. Ancho, I. V., & Arrieta, G. S. (2021). Filipino teacher professionaldevelopment in the new normal. Educ. Self Dev, 16(3), 25-43.
  7. Andrew, A., Cattan, S., Costa-Dias, M., Farquharson, C., Kraftman,L., Krutikova, S., Phimister, A., & Sevilla, A. (2020). LearningDuring the Lockdown: Real-Time Data on Children’s Experiencesduring Home Learning. IFS Briefing Note BN288. Institute forF i s c a l S t u d i e s . R e t r i e v e d f r o mhttps://www.ifs.org.uk/ publications/14848
  8. Bajar, J. T., Bajar, M. A., & Alarcon, E. P. (2021). School LearningAction Cell as a Remedy to Out-of-Field Teaching: A Case in OneRural School in Southern Philippines. International Journal ofE d u c a t i o n a l M a n a g e m e n t a n dInnovation. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v2i3.3667
  9. Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social CognitiveTheory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175.
  10. Bantoc, A. (2022). Project Hiraya: A PPST-Based Scaffold toIncrease the Number of Action Research and the Level ofPerformance of Teachers. Zenodo (CERN European Organizationfor Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7016253
  11. Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning:Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learningdelivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics andI n f o r m a t i c s , 3 5 ( 7 ) , 2 0 8 2 – 2 0 9 8 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010
  12. Basibas, A. T., Fabiosa, A. R., Aconga, M. M. G., & Tentativa, J. R.(2021). Strengthening Community Linkages: Basis for anIntervention Program. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports,48–59. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2021/v27i130347
  13. Batac, K. I. T., Baquiran, J. A., & Agaton, C. B. (2021). QualitativeContent Analysis of Teachers’ Perceptions and Experiences in UsingBlended Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. InternationalJournal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(6),225–243. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.6.12
  14. Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020).Engagement, disengagement, and performance when learning withtechnologies in upper secondary school. Computers &Education, 149, 103783.
  15. Beruin, L. C. (2022). STEM Students' Conceptions of OnlineLearning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A PhenomenographicStudy. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(4), 143-167.
  16. Bluman, A. G. (2013). Elementary statistics: A step-by-stepapproach: A brief version. McGraw-Hill.
  17. Boland, J. (2017). Instructional strategies and course design forteaching statistics online: perspectives from online students.I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l of S T EM E d u c a t i o n ,4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0096-x
  18. Bold, T., Filmer, D., Martin, G., Molina, E., Stacy, B., Rockmore,C., ... & Wane, W. (2017). Enrollment Without Learning: TeacherEffort, Knowledge, and Skill in Primary Schools In Africa. Journalof Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 185-204.
  19. Bostancıoğlu, A., & Handley, Z. (2018). Developing and validatinga questionnaire for evaluating the EFL ‘Total PACKage’:Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) forEnglish as a Foreign Language (EFL). Computer assisted languagelearning, 31(5-6), 572-598.
  20. Bulturbayevich, M. B., Rahmat, A. R., & Murodullayevich, M. N.(2021). Improving Teacher-Student Collaboration and EducationalEffectiveness by Overcoming Learning Challenges. Jurnal IlmuP e n d i d i k a n N o n f o r m a l , 7 ( 1 ) , 1 5 3 . https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.7.1.153-160.2021
  21. Campbell, P. S., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. T., Conant, D.L., Rust, A. H., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Griffin, M. J., & Choi,Y. (2014). The Relationship Between Teachers’ MathematicalContent and Pedagogical Knowledge, Teachers’ Perceptions, andStudent Achievement. Journal for Research in MathematicsE d u c a t i o n , 4 5 ( 4 ) , 4 1 9 – 4 5 9 . https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0419
  22. Cardullo, V., Wang, C. H., Burton, M., & Dong, J. (2021). K-12teachers’ remote teaching self-efficacy during the pandemic. Journalof research in innovative teaching & learning, 14(1), 32-45.
  23. Chen, R., Iqbal, J., Liu, Y., Zhu, M., & Xie, Y. (2022). Impact ofSelf-Concept, Self-Imagination, and Self-Efficacy on EnglishLanguage Learning Outcomes Among Blended Learning StudentsDuring COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784444
  24. Choi, E., & Lee, J. (2016). Investigating the relationship of targetlanguage proficiency and self-efficacy among non-native EFLt e a c h e r s . A s y s t e m , 5 8 , 4 9 – 6 3 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.02.010
  25. Clarin, A. S., & Baluyos, E. L. (2021). Student Engagement andTeaching Competence in Relation to the Implementation of OnlineDistance Learning.
  26. Coronado, R. B., Pascual, E. A., & Orijola, J. U. (2021). EfficientUse of Audio-Visual Equipment in Teaching and Learning: It’sImplication to School Supervision. Efficient Use of Audio-VisualEquipment in Teaching and Learning: It? s Implication to SchoolSupervision, 87(1), 9-9.
  27. Cosentino, C., Null, C., Sridharan, S., & Meyer, L. (2017). Policiesand Programs to Improve Secondary Education in DevelopingCountries. Mathematica Policy Research.
  28. Counts, J., Katsiyannis, A., & Whitford, D. K. (2018). Culturallyand linguistically diverse learners in special education: Englishlearners. NASSP Bulletin, 102(1), 5-21.
  29. Custodio, R. J., Fulgado, V. A., & Lingad, J. A. (2021).Investigating the effects of student-led flipped classrooms onlearners' engagement, academic achievement, and problem-solvingskills. Computers & Education, 174, 104214.
  30. Czerkawski, B., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An Instructional DesignFramework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online LearningE n v i r o n m e n t s . T ec h T r en d s , 6 0 (6 ), 5 3 2 – 5 3 9 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
  31. De Vera, J. L., Andrada, M. D., Bello, A., & De Vera, M. G. (2021).Teachers' competencies in educational technology integration oninstructional methodologies in the new normal. Lukad: An OnlineJournal of Pedagogy, 1(1), 61-80.
  32. Del Rosario, N. V. (2019, January 18). The Status of IndividualPerformance Commitment Review (IPCR) Implementation forTeachers in Public Secondary Schools in the District of TreceM a r t i r e s C i t y : A B a s i s fo r an I n t e r v e n t i o nScheme. https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/10929
  33. Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2016). Instructional Coaching as High-Quality Professional Development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
  34. Dias, M. C., Cattan, S., Andrew, A., Krutikova, S., Farquharson, C.,Phimister, A., Kraftman, L., & Sevilla, A. (2022). Learning duringthe lockdown: real-time data on children’s experiences during homel e a r n i n g . In I n s t i t u t e f o r F i s c a l S t u d i e s . https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/14848
  35. Dubey, D. N. (2010). Work Motivation, Assertiveness, TeachingCompetence, and Teaching Performance among MaritimeEducators. Research Journal College of Engineering JBLFMU-Molo, 3(1), 1-1.
  36. Ezike, B. U. (2018). Classroom environment and academic interestas correlates of achievement in senior secondary school chemistry inIbadan Southwest Local Government Area, Oyo State,Nigeria. Global Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 61-71.
  37. Fathi, J., & Derakhshan, A. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy andemotional regulation as predictors of teaching stress: Aninvestigation of Iranian English language teachers. Teaching EnglishLanguage, 13(2), 117-143.
  38. Fisher, R. A. (1925, July). Theory of statistical estimation.In Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophicalsociety (Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 700-725). Cambridge University Press.
  39. Fisk, Gary. (n.d.). Getting Started with PSPP – A Statistics SoftwareTutorial. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.R e t r i e v e d o n J u l y 8 , 2 0 2 2 , f r o m https://garyfisk.com/pspp/index.html
  40. Franchi, T. (2020). The impact of the Covid◻19 pandemic oncurrent anatomy education and future careers: A student’sperspective. Anatomical sciences education, 13(3), 312.
  41. Gallardo, R. D., & Cañete, R. A. D. (2019). Students with SpecialNeeds in The Mainstream Classroom: Voices of Teachers in thePublic School. Southeast Asian Journal of EducationalManagement, 1(1), 1-1.
  42. Garbe, A., Ogurlu, U., Ns, L., & Cook, P. (2020). Parents’Experiences with Remote Education during COVID-19 SchoolClosures. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8471
  43. Geronimo, C. A., Geronimo, A. L., & Faustino, S. M. (2022).Readiness, Access, Challenges, and Efficiency in using FlexibleMode of Learning: Inputs for Instructional ManagementPlan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Businessand Education Research, 3(5), 865-875.
  44. Gepila Jr, E. (2020). Assessing teachers using Philippine standardsfor teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3),739-746.
  45. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 19 step bystep. Boston, Mass.
  46. Gilavand, A. (2016). Investigating the impact of environmentalfactors on learning and academic achievement of elementarystudents. Health Sciences, 5(7S), 360-9.
  47. Gonzalez, T., De La Rubia, M. A., Hincz, K. P., Comas-Lopez, M.,Subirats, L., Fort, S., & Sacha, G. M. (2020). Influence ofCOVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in highereducation. PloS one, 15(10), e0239490.
  48. Gross, J., Haines, S. J., Hill, C., Francis, G. L., Blue-Banning, M., &Turnbull, A. P. (2015). Strong School-Community Partnerships inInclusive Schools Are" Part of the Fabric of the School... We Counton Them". School Community Journal, 25(2), 9-34.
  49. Gündüz, Y. (2022). The Correlation between Teachers' Self-EfficacyPerceptions and Tolerance and Psychological Well-Being. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(3),1307-1327.
  50. Haoucha, M. (2022). Policies and Procedures for the Implementationof Safe and Healthy Educational Environments: Post-COVID-19Perspectives: Post-COVID-19 Perspectives. IGI Global.
  51. Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). Examining the Relationship betweenTeachers’ Self-Efficacy, their Digital Competence, Strategies toEvaluate Information, and Use of ICT at School. ScandinavianJournal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501
  52. Hayes, A. (2023). Descriptive Statistics: Definition, Overview,T y p e s , E x a m p l e . I n v e s t o p e d i a . https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/descriptive_statistics.asp
  53. Hayes, D. L. (2016). Fallacies affecting policy and practice inteaching English as a foreign language in state primary schools inA s i a . A s i a P a c i f i c J o u r n a l ofEducation. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1240660
  54. Hechanova, Rolando F. & Hechanova, Ruby S. (2012). AppliedParametric Statistics. First Edition. Sultan Kudarat State University. Research Development & Extension Division. Tacurong City,Philippines.
  55. Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A.(2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching andonline learning.
  56. Hoy, W. K., & Forsyth, P. B. (1986). Effective supervision: Theoryinto practice. Random House.
  57. Jiang, L., Zang, N., Zhou, N., & Cao, H. (2022). English teachers’intention to use flipped teaching: Interrelationships with needssatisfaction, motivation, self-efficacy, belief, and support. ComputerAssisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1890-1919.
  58. Karim, A., & Khan, A. (2021). Instructional Competence ofTeachers: An Overview. Journal of Education and EducationalDevelopment, 8(1), 65-71.
  59. Keller, G. (2022). Statistics for management and economics.Cengage Learning.
  60. Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a Blended LearningApproach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in anAction Research Study. Online Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.182
  61. Khalil, R., Mansour, A. E., Fadda, W. A., Almisnid, K., Aldamegh,M., Al-Nafeesah, A., ... & Al-Wutayd, O. (2020). The suddentransition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medicalstudents’ perspectives. BMC medical education, 20, 1-10.
  62. Khan, B. H., Affouneh, S., Soheil, H. S., & Zuheir, N. K. (2021).Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks. IGI Global.
  63. Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., & Kouraïchi, B. (2021). Emergency remote learning during COVID-19 crisis: Students’ engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7033–7055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10566-4
  64. Kim, S. M. (2019). Blended Based Global Competence Learning Model for Youth. In ICERI2019 Proceedings (pp. 2121-2123).IATED.
  65. Kingpum, P., Ruangsuwan, C., & Chaicharoen, S. (2015). A Development of a Collaborative Blended Learning Model toEnhance the Learning Achievement and Thinking Ability ofUndergraduate Students at the Institute of PhysicalEducation. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(15), 2168-2177.
  66. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics,design features, and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1 ). https://doi.o rg/10.1186/s41239 -017 -0043-4.
  67. Ladendorf, K., Muehsler, H., Xie, Y., & Hinderliter, H. (2021).Teacher perspectives of self-efficacy and remote learning due to the emergency school closings of 2020. Educational Media International, 58(2), 124-144.
  68. Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment,motivation, and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.
  69. Lazarides, R., & Warner, L. M. (2020). Teacher Self-Efficacy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.890
  70. Lerch, J. C., & Buckner, E. (2018). From education for peace toeducation in conflict: Changes in UNESCO discourse, 1945–2015. Globalization, Societies and Education, 16(1), 27-48.
  71. Li, C., He, J., Yuan, C., Chen, B., & Sun, Z. (2019). The effects ofblended learning on nursing students' knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Nurse education today, 82, 51-57.
  72. Loveless, B. (2023). Bandura’s Social Learning Theory inE d u c a t i o n . E d u c a t i o n C o r n e r . https://www.educationcorner.com/social-learning-theory/
  73. Maddux, J. E. (2013). Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment:Theory, Research, and Application. Springer Science & BusinessMedia.
  74. Mahmood, S. (2020). Instructional Strategies for Online Teaching inCOVID ◻19 Pandemic. Human Behavior and EmergingTechnologies, 3(1), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.218.
  75. Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? TheInternational Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
  76. Marien, M., & Zabava, O. (2014). New Book Briefs. World FuturesReview, 6(2), 194–207.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756714541405.
  77. Masonbrink, A. R., & Hurley, E. A. (2020). Advocating for ChildrenDuring the COVID-19 School Closures. Pediatrics, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1440.
  78. Matteson, S. L. (2022). Mixed Methods Action Research: HowIntegrating Student Response Technology and Case Studies in aLargely Populated University Course Influences StudentEngagement, Feedback, and Learning (Doctoral dissertation,University of South Carolina).
  79. Mitra, D. L., Serriere, S. C., & Alperin, M. (2022). Teachers'Community Engagement and School Climate: A National Study.Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 4-16.
  80. Moreira-Fontán, E., García-Señorán, M., Conde-Rodríguez, Á., &González, A. (2019). Teachers' ICT-related self-efficacy, jobresources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations withautonomous motivation and work engagement. Computers &Education, 134, 63-77.
  81. Murtiningsih, M., Kristiawan, M., & Lian, B. (2019). Thecorrelation between supervision of headmaster and interpersonalcommunication with work ethos of the teacher. European Journal ofEducation Studies.
  82. Nuncio, R. V., Arcinas, M. M., Lucas, R. I. G., Alontaga, J. V. Q.,Neri, S. G. T., & Carpena, J. M. (2020). An E-learning outreachprogram for public schools: Findings and lessons learned based on apilot program in Makati City and Cabuyao City, Laguna,Philippines. Evaluation and Program Planning, 82, 101846.. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments First Results from TALIS: First Results from TALIS. OECD Publishing.
  83. Owusu-Agyeman, Y., & Larbi-Siaw, O. (2018). Exploring TheFactors that Enhance Student–Content Interaction in a Technology-Mediated Learning Environment. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1456780. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2018.1456780.
  84. Pagocag, H. (2019, January 18). Influence of Monitoring, Evaluationand Plan Adjustment (MEPA) on the Performance and Work Commitment of Teachers. https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/6522
  85. Pombo, L., & Marques, M. M. (2021). Guidelines for teachertraining in mobile augmented reality games: Hearing the teachers’voices. Education Sciences, 11(10), 597.
  86. Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2021). The role ofexpert feedback in the development of pre-service teachers’professional vision of classroom management in an online blendedlearning environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103276.
  87. Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Asystematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gapsidentified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z.
  88. Rafiola, R. (2020, April 24). The Effect of Learning Motivation,Self-Efficacy, and Blended Learning on Students’ Achievement inThe Industrial Revolution 4.0. Learning & Technology Library(LearnTechLib). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217073/
  89. Rahayu, A., Apriliandari, D. I., & Sulisworo, D. (2018). BlendedLearning: Improving Student’s Motivation in English TeachingLearning Process. International Journal of Languages’ Educationand Teaching, 6(1), 163-170.
  90. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. H. (2020). Students andteachers’ challenges of using technology in blended learningenvironments. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383845.3383875.
  91. Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A.,Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). Primaryschool teachers’ perceptions of online learning during theCOVID-19 pandemic period. Journal of Ethnic and CulturalStudies, 7(2), 90-109.
  92. Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., & Smith, N. (2017). TheFlipped Classroom: Practice and Practices in Higher Education.Springer.
  93. Rivera, J. (2017). The Blended Learning Environment: A ViableAlternative for Special Needs Students. Journal of Education andTraining Studies, 5(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2125.
  94. Rodríguez-Almagro, J., Prado-Laguna, M. D. C., Hernández-Martínez, A., Monzón-Ferrer, A., Muñoz-Camargo, J. C., & Martín-Lopez, M. (2021). The impact on nursing students of creatingaudiovisual material through digital storytelling as a teachingmethod. International Journal Of Environmental Research andPublic Health, 18(2), 694.
  95. Rudasill, K. M., Snyder, K. E., Levinson, H., & L Adelson, J.(2018). Systems view of school climate: A theoretical framework forresearch. Educational psychology review, 30, 35-60.
  96. Segall, R., & Niu, G. (2020). Open-Source Software for StatisticalAnalysis of Big Data: Emerging Research and Opportunities.Engineering Science Reference.
  97. Sen, S. (2016). Construction and Standardization of Self-Efficacy Scale for Secondary School Teachers. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Construction-And-Standardization-Of-Self-Efficacy-Sen-Sood/a6e5bba7ac6b214703e9a69f3eac8cd59179ac60#%20citing-paper.
  98. Shaaban, S. S. A. (2022). Video-Based Reflection and PeerCoaching in Enhancing TEFL Student-Teachers’ Teaching Practicesof Receptive Skills. Journal of Education and E-learning Research,9 ( 2 ) , 103–109.,9(2),103–109. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i2.3991
  99. Sides, J. D., & Cuevas, J. A. (2020). Effect of Goal Setting forMotivation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance in ElementaryMathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1341a.
  100. Simbajon, D. (2021). Problems, Coping Strategies, and OnlineTeaching Readiness of English Teachers Amid COVID-19Pandemic. IMCC Journal of Science, 1(Special), 15-34.
  101. Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best ofonline and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learningapproach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemicworld. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171.
  102. Talampas, R. M., & Martinez, V. C. (2021). Unraveling the LivedExperiences of the English Language Teachers in the New Normal:A Phenomenology. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 43(1), 57-85.
  103. Tejada, J. J., & Punzalan, J. R. B. (2012). On the misuse of Slovin’sformula. The philippine statistician, 61(1), 129-136.
  104. Telmo, L. R. (2020). Dynamic Concept of Integrating TechnologicalPedagogical Content Knowledge. First Edition. Sultan Kudarat StateUniversity. Tacurong City, Philippines.
  105. Thompson, C. S. (2018). 'School Administrators' and Stakeholders'Attitudes toward, and Perspectives on, School ImprovementPlanning. Educational Planning, 25(4), 7-26.
  106. Turner, J. E., Li, B., Pan, Y., Kim, J., & Chen, Y. (2022). Goalcomplexes. In The Routledge handbook of second languageacquisition and individual differences (pp. 145-158). Routledge.
  107. Tosun, S. (2015). The Effects of Blended Learning on EFLStudents’ Vocabulary Enhancement. Procedia - Social andB e h a v i o r a l S c i e n c e s , 1 9 9 , 6 4 1 – 6 4 7 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592
  108. Tupas, F. P., & Linas-Laguda, M. (2020). Blended Learning – AnApproach in Philippine Basic Education Curriculum in NewNormal: A Review of Current Literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research . https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081154.%20Vagias,%20&%20Wade%20M.%20(2006).%20Likert-Type%20Scale%20Response%20Anchors.%20Clemson%20International%20Institute%20for%20Tourism%20&%20ResearchDevelopment,DepartmentofParks,RecreationandTourismManagement.ClemsonUniversity.
  109. Valverde-Berrocoso, J., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2020).Instructional design in blended learning: Theoretical foundations andguidelines for practice. Blended Learning: Convergence betweenTechnology and Pedagogy, 113-140.
  110. Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review ofteacher guidance during primary and secondary educationcollaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001.
  111. Vilo, A., & Taha, H. S. (2023). Effectiveness on the Use of BlendedLearning Approach (BLA): Its Implications on the Students’Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: AppliedBusiness and Education Research, 4(1), 214-221., 4(1), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.01.20.
  112. Warmansyah, J., Komalasari, E., Febriani, E. L., Gusmiati, N., &Amalina, N. (2022). Factors Affecting Teacher Readiness for Online Learning (TROL) in Early Childhood Education: TISE and TPACK.Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 16(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.161.03.
  113. Warner, R. M. (2012). Applied statistics: From bivariate throughmultivariate techniques. Sage Publications.
  114. William, M. K. (2006). Descriptive statistics. Retrieved September 21, 2016.
  115. Yeigh, T., Lynch, D., Fradale, P., Lawless, E., Turner, D., & Willis,R. (2021). Improving Schools with Blended Learning: How to MakeTechnology Work in the Modern Classroom. Routledge.
  116. Zheng, F., Khan, N. A., & Hussain, S. (2020). The COVID 19pandemic and digital higher education: Exploring the impact ofproactive personality on social capital through internet self-efficacyand online interaction quality. Children and Youth ServicesReview, 119, 105694.
  117. Zhu, M., Berri, S., & Zhang, K. (2021). Effective instructionalstrategies and technology use in blended learning: A case study.Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6143–6161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10544-w.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic