HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 14 no. 7 (2023)

Challenges and Coping Mechanisms in Online Classes of Freshmen Master of Arts in Education

Carlito Abarquez | Najera Macud

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The goal of the study was to identify the difficulties and coping mechanisms faced by first-year students enrolled in online Master of Arts in Education courses at St. Peter's College in Iligan City during the first semester of the academic year 2022–2023. The survey provided information on the respondent profiles in terms of their age, sex, civil status, career, technology usage, and monthly family income. Also, the difficulties of taking lessons online, including isolation, instructor ability, motivation, and features. The respondents' coping strategies for the difficulties of taking online classes as well as for course, individual, technological, and environmental difficulties. Significant differences in the challenges and coping mechanisms for the challenges in the online classes of the respondents when grouped according to their socio-demographic profile and significant relationship between the respondents’ challenges in online classes and their coping mechanisms. Family monthly income and age mediated the relationship between respondents’ challenges and coping mechanisms were determined. The data gathered led to develop an action plan and made recommendations for this study. The study used the descriptive- correlational research method. It involved 149 students as respondents. The data used an adapted questionnaire that was validated through pilot testing. The result showed that most of the respondent’s challenges in online classes were motivation, features of online classes, and isolation. The respondents' coping mechanisms for the challenges were in terms of environmental challenges; nevertheless, the other coping mechanisms—course challenges, technological challenges, and individual challenges—were also affirmed to have a better coping mechanism in their online class. The challenges faced by the respondents did significantly differed with the gadgets they used and their family's monthly income and coping mechanisms for online class challenges did significantly differed by their family's monthly income. The challenges in online classes were significantly correlated with their coping



References:

  1. Alexander, M., Truell, A., & Zhao, J. (2012). Expected advantagesand disadvantages of online learning: Perceptions from collegestudents who have not taken online courses. Issues in InformationSystems.Algahtani, A. F. (2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the E-learning Experience in Some Universities in Saudi Arabia fromMale Students’ Perceptions. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3215/
  2. Australian Council of Professions (2003). What is aprofession? https://www.professions.org.au/what-is-a-professional/Blakey,  L. (2010). The proliferation, pitfalls, and power of onlineeducation. Research Journal.
  3. Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G.(2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as animmediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia.International Journal for Research in Applied Science &Engineering Technology, 8(III). Distance Delivery and LearningOutcomes: Emerging Trends and Programs. Ed. Deb Gearhart., Vol.1, No. 8, pp.283-289.
  4. Beegle, J. A. & Rice, R. (1965). Some demographic characteristicsof rural youth, in rural youth in crisis: Facts myths and socialchange. ed. Lee G. Buchinal. Washington: Government PrintingOffice. Hershey. Information Science Reference.
  5. Bertram, C., Mthiyane, N., & Mukeredzi, T. (2013). It will make mea real teacher’: Learning experiences of part time PGCE students inSouth Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 448-456.
  6. Borden, J. (2011). The Future of Online Learning. https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2024704
  7. Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M.M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T.I. (2014).Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from asix-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis &Management.
  8. Brocato, B. R., Bonanno, A., & Ulbig, S. (2015). Studentperceptions and instructional evaluations: A multivariate analysis ofonline and face-to-face classroom settings. Education andI n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g i e s . d o i : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9268-6.
  9. B u s i n e s s D i c t i o n a r y . c o m . ( 2 0 1 6 ) . https://www.dictionary.com/browse/business
  10. Cahyadi, B. (2014). Membuat webcam sebagai CCTV melaluiss m a r t p h o n e a n d r o i d . Y o g y a k a r t a : ANDI https://www.academia.edu/86932232.
  11. Cambridge Dictionary. (1999). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/Cara Friedman (202). Students’ Major Online Learning Challengesa m i d t h e C O V I D - 1 9 P a n d e m i c . https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/64332688/
  12. Cazan, A. M., & Indreica, S. E. (2014). Need for cognition andapproaches to learning among university students. Procedia-Socialand Behavioral Sciences Journal.
  13. Chaney E. G. (2001). Web-based instruction in a rural high school:A collaborative inquiry into its effectiveness and desirability.NASSP Bulletin.
  14. Claris Caga Belgica, Janice A.Calugan, Juliet Ugay Dumo & LarilynAkiapat Simber (2020). Online distance learning:Thematic study onthe challenges faced by Educare College Inc. primary pupils. https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/30-10340.pdf.
  15. Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOTanalysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective oftheir beneficiaries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.
  16. Cho, M., & Rathbun, G. (2013). Implementing teacher-centeredonline teacher professional development (OTPD) program in highereducation: A case study. Innovations in Education and TeachingInternational.
  17. Cole, M., Shelley, D., & Swartz, L. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three- year study. TheInternational Review Of of Research In in Open and DistributedLearning. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748.
  18. David Garson. (1998). The effects of gender, educational level, andpersonality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19p a n d e m i c .  https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3
  19. Davidson, R. (2015). Wiki use that increases communication andcollaboration motivation. Journal of Learning Design.Demographic Variable. (1999). 1285.0 - Demographic Variables,1 9 9 9 . https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/8A82CE62440E5D2DCA25697E0018FEA8?opendocument
  20. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time ofcovid-19 crisis. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018.
  21. DiBiase, D. & Kidwai, K. (2010). Wasted on the young? Comparingthe performance and attitudes of younger and older US adults in anonline class on geographic information. Journal of Geography inHigher Education, 34(3), 299-326.
  22. Dobbs, R. D., Waid, C. A. & del Carmen, A. ((2009). Students’perceptions of online courses: The effect on online courseexperience. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education.
  23. Dr. Mansi Somaiya (2015). Study of mechanisms of coping,resilience and quality of life in medical undergraduates. https://www.indjsp.org/article.asp?issn=0971-9962;year=2015. 4
  24. Drennan, J.& Clarke, M. (2009). Coursework master’s programmes:The student’s experience of research and research supervision.Studies in Higher Education,34 (5), 483-500.
  25. Duncan, H. E., Range, B., & Hvidston, D. (2013). Exploring studentperceptions of rigor online: Toward a definition of rigorous learning.Journal on Excellence in College Teaching.
  26. Daugherty, M., & Funke, B. L. (1998). University faculty andstudent perceptions of Web-based instruction. Journal of DistanceEducation. 13 (1), 21-39.
  27. Education Reform Glossary of Education. (2021). https://www.edglossary.org/https://www.finduniversity.ph/https://www.finduniversity.ph/
  28. Elliot A. J., Dweck C. S., Yeager D. S. (2017). Handbook ofcompetence and motivation: Theory and application. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. https://scholar.google.com/citations.
  29. Estévez, J. A., Castro-Martínez, J., & Granobles, H. R. (2015). Laeducación virtual en Colombia: Exposición de modelos dedeserción. Apertura, 7(1). https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6445&context=etd
  30. Factor, R., Oliver, A. L., & Stecklov, G. (2012). Professionalhomogeneity: Global versus local effects. International Journal ofSociology and Anthropology, 4 (3), 100-115.
  31. Favale, T., Soro, F., Trevisan, M., Drago, I., & Mellia, M. (2020).Campus traffic and eLearning during COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128620306046
  32. FindUniversity. (2010). https://www.finduniversity.ph/Genelyn R. Baluyos & Ariel R. Clarin (2021). Experiences ofinstructors in online teaching: A phenomenological study eduline:Journal of Education and Learning Innovation ISSN: 2775-6173( o n l i n e ) V o l . 1 N o . 2 ( 2 0 2 1 ) https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.edu line542.
  33. Gillet- Swan, G. (2017) The challenges of online learning supportingand engaging the isolated learner Queensland University ofT ech n o lo g y . j e n n a . g i l l e t t s w a n @ q u t . e d u . a u https://eprints.qut.edu.au/102750/1/293-749-1-PB.pdf.
  34. Gilbert, B. (2015). Online learning revealing the benefits andc h a l l e n g e s . E d u c a t i o n M a s t e r s . https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/education_ETD_masters/303.
  35. Gunawardena, C., Linder-VanBerschot, J., LaPointe, D., & Rao, L.(2010). Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in acorporate online education program. American Journal of DistanceEducation.Glosarry https://www.edglossary.org/.
  36. Harris, M. (1996). Review of postgraduate education (London,Higher Education Funding Councilfor England). akt. Hesketh AJ ve
  37. Peter TK (1999) Postgraduates' Choice of Programme:helpinguniversities to market and postgraduates to choose. Studies inHigherEducation,24 (2), 95-107.
  38. Hayeon Song, Jihyun Kim & Wen Luo (2014). Teacher–studentrelationship in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S074756321530048
  39. Henke, H & Russum, J. (2000) Factors influencing attrition rates ina corporate distance education program. Education at a DistanceJ o u r n a l . I n c i t f i t https://incentfit.com/wellness-word/group-challenges-vs-personal.
  40. Hill, J.R. (2002). Overcoming obstacles and creating connections:Community building in Web-based learning environments. Journalof Computing in Higher Education, 14(1), 67 – 86.
  41. Incentfit. (2020). Wellness Benefits for a Healthier Workplace.https://incentfit.com/
  42. Jayadi, A. M. (2020) An Analysis of student’s difficulties in onlinelearning process thrugh whatsapp media in English department atM u h a m m a d i y a h U n i v e r s i t y of M a t a r a m . http://repository.ummat.ac.id/1714/1/COVER-CHAPTER_III%5B1%5D.pdf.
  43. Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbookfor face-to-face and online environments. Research Journal.
  44. Jennifer-Sullivan, H. (2022). Online learning: Common struggles ford i v e r s e l e a r n e r s . https://www.collegiateparent.com/academics/online-learning-struggles-for-diverse-learners/
  45. Jordan Friedman (2020). Tackle challenges of online classes due toC O V I D - 1 9 https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/how-to-overcome-challenges-of-online-classes-due-to-coronavirus.
  46. K a ti e T e r r e l l H a n n a ( 2 0 2 2 ) . A c t i o n p l an . https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/action-plan.
  47. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues andchallenges for teaching successful online courses in highereducation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems.
  48. Karkar-Esperat, & Tala, M. (2018). International graduate students’challenges and learning experiences in online classes. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1197277.pdf
  49. Kress, H., Thering, A., Lalonde, C., Kim, S., & Cleeton, L. (2012).Faculty reflections on online course development andimplementation for teacher education. International Journal ofTechnology, Knowledge & Society.
  50. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learningand teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how dowe know? A Critical Literature Review. Learning, Media andTechnology.
  51. Kirtman, L. (2009). Online versus in-class courses: An examinationof differences in learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education,1 8 ( 2 ) , 1 0 3 - 1 1 6 . http://search.proquest.com/docview/233320851?accountid=27700.
  52. C.H. Ko, S. Hsiao, G. Liu, J. Yen, M. Yang, C. Yen. (2010). TheCharacteristics of Decision Making, Potential to Take Risks, AndPersonality of College Students with Internet Addiction. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165178108003570
  53. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present, andf u t u r e . P s y c h o s o m . M ed . 55, 2 3 4 – 2 4 7 . d o i:10.1097/00006842 -199305000-00002
  54. Lederman, Doug. (2018). Online Education: Worldwide Status,C h a l l e n g e s , T r e n d s , a n d I m p l i c a t i o n s . https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262
  55. Lehmann, K. (2004). How to be a great online teacher. Lanham, Md:Scarecrow Education.
  56. Littlefield, J. (2018). The difference between synchronous anda s y n c h r o n o u s d i s t a n c elearning. https://www.thoughtco.com/synchronous-distance-learning-asynchronousdistance-learning-1097959.
  57. Liu, I., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. (2010). Extendingthe TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use anonline learning community. Computers & Education.
  58. Lev Vygotsky. (1960). Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory ofC o g n i t i v e D e v e l o p m e n t https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html#:~:text=Vygotsky's%20approach%20to%20child%20development,of%20knowledge%20through%20social%20negotiation.
  59. Liyan Song, Ernise S. Singleton, Janette R. Hill, & Myung Hwa Koh(2004), Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful andc h a l l e n g i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . https://d1wqtxsts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/33545799/1-with-cover-page.
  60. Mathew, L. (2017). The absence of internet at home is a problem fors o m estudents. https://www.theedadvocate.org/the-absence-of-internet-at-home-is-a-problem-for-some-students.
  61. Matuga, J. M. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, andacademic achievement of secondary students in online universitycourses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 4-n/a. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1287037464?accountid=27700.
  62. Margaret-Visnji, L. (2020). The importance of digital gadgets forstudents and their ed ucational ach ievements. V https://revenuesandprofits.com/digital-gadgets-for-students/#:~:text=Digital%20gadgets%20reduce%20time.
  63. Mark Anthony Llego. (2022). 5 reasons why teachers should pursuea m a s t e r ’ s d e g r e e i n e d u c a t i o n . https://www.teacherph.com/teachers-masters-degree-education/
  64. McEwen L., Monk, J., Hay, I., Kneale, P., & King, H. (2008).Strength in diversity: Enhancing learning in vocationally-orientated,master's level courses. Journal of Geography in HigherEducation,32(1): 101-119.
  65. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Socialinteraction and the creation of a sense of community. EducationalT e c h n o l o g y &Society. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279598456_Online_Learning_Social_Interaction_and_the_Creation_of_a_Sense_of_Community.
  66. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009).Evaluation of evidence based practices in online learning studies.Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and PolicyDevelopment.
  67. Meriam Webster n.d Meyer. https://www.merriam-webster.com/
  68. Kobani. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What worksand why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1-114. doi:10.1002/aehe.20018.
  69. McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces:Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate studentengagement in online learning. The International Review ofResearch in Open and Distributed Learning.
  70. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systemsview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  71. Mudrak J., Zabrodska K., & Machovcova K. (2019). Cumulativeadvantage or job crafting? Organizational and psychologicalconditions of the development of research excellence in early careerr e s e a r c h e r s . C e s k . P s y c h o l . 6 3 , 4 4 5 https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=uu5SMm28HqcC&hl=en&oi.
  72. Murat Çalışoğlu & Abdul Samet Yalvaç (2018). The difficulties thatthe teachers who continue master of science education experience. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331906006_The_Difficulties_That_the_Teachers_Who_Continue_Master_of_Science_Education.
  73. Nazime, Tuncay. (2016). Smartphones as tools for distanceeducation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605968.pdf.
  74. Oswal, S. K., & Meloncon, L. (2014). Paying attention toaccessibility when designing online courses in technical andprofessional communication. Journal of Business and TechnicalCommunication.
  75. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habitsmake smartphone use more pervasive. personal ubiquitousc o m p u t i n g ( 2 ) https://www.academia.edu/86932232/Gadget_Utility_Used_by_Elementary_School_Students_for_Online_Learning.
  76. Parkes, M. (2014). Online learning: A panacea in the time ofcovid-19 crisis. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018.
  77. Parthiba, Kumar. (2020). Online learning is the future of education:H e r e ’ s w h y . https://elearningindustry.com/why-online-learning-is-future-of-education.
  78. Pavlov, Ivan & Skinner, Burrhus Frederic. (1971). BehavioristApproach. https://www.simplypsychology.org/behaviorism.html
  79. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On theHorizon.
  80. Piaget, Jean. (1950). 4 Stages of Cognitive Development Explained. https://www.verywellmind.com/piagets-stages-of-cognitive-development-2795457
  81. Reindolf Yao Nani, oliver Eddward, Emmanuel, &Onesimus, K. (2016). Assessment of family income on academicperformance of tertiary students: The case of Ho Polytechnic,Ghana. https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/2221/Article.%20Rizalin,%20Francisco.%20(2001).%20Virtual%20learning:%20Challenges%20and%20coping%20mechanisms%20of%20language%20learnersinruralareas. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355194708_Virtual_Learning_Challenges_and_Coping_Mechanisms_of_Language_Learners_in_Rural.
  82. Rossett, A. (2002). Waking in the night and thinking about e-learning. In A. Rossett (Ed.), The ASTD e-learning handbook (pp.3–18). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  83. Russell, T. (2021). The “no significant difference phenomenon”. http://teleeducation.nbca/nosignificantdiffrence/
  84. Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learningonline (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  85. Salmon, G. (2014). Learning innovation: A framework fortransformation. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning.
  86. Savenye, W.C. (2005). Improving online courses: What isinteraction and why use it? (Undetermined). Distance Learning.
  87. Schmidt, S. W., Tschida, C. M., & Hodge, E. M. (2016). Howfaculty learn to teach online: What administrators need to know.Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring191/schmidhodge191.html.
  88. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we defineonline learning? A systematic literature review of definitions ofonline learning (1988-2018). American Journal of DistanceEducation.
  89. Shea, P., Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presenceand student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education.
  90. S h o r e , J. ( 2 0 2 0 ) . P r o b l e m s in o n l i n e c l a s s . https://file:///C:/Users/julie/Desktop/research%20example.pdfeducation.seattlepi.com/problems-online-classes-1132.html.
  91. Simon, E. (2012) The impact of online teaching on higher educationfaculty’s professional identity and the role of technology: Thec o m i n g of a g e of t h e v i r t u a lteacher: https://www.colorado.edu/atlas/sites/default/files/attached-files/the_impact_of_online_teaching_on_higher_education_faculty.pdf
  92. Skilbeck, M. (2001). The university challenged: A review ofinternational trends and issues with particular reference to Ireland.D u b l i n : H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n A u t h o r i t y . T C . https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=21510.
  93. Stansfield, M., McLellan, E., & Connolly, T. (2004). Enhancingstudent performance in online learning and traditional face-to-faceclass delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education.
  94. Tallent- Runnels, m.K., Thomass, J A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S.,Ahern , T.C., Shaw, S. M., & Li, X. (2006). Teaching courseso n l i n e : A r e v i e w o f t h e r e s e a r c h . https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/00346543076001093
  95. Tao Lin & Han, L. (2017). The effects of family income onchildren’s education: An empirical analysis of CHNS data. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321317848_The_effects_of_family_income_on_children's_education_An_empirical_analysis_of_CHNS.
  96. Thomson, L. D. (2010). Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ andstudents’ perspectives on how online learning can meet the needs ofgifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662-712. http://joa.sagepub.com.pluma.sjfc.edu/content/21/4/662.full.pdf+html .
  97. Thomas A. Simonds, S.J., Ed.D., Barbara L. Brock, Ed.D., (2014).Relationship between age, experience, and student preference forty pesof learning activities in online courses. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1020106.pdf.
  98. Ullah, A., Ashraf, M., Ashraf, S., & Ahmed, S. (2021). Challengesof online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic encountered bystudents in Pakistan. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology , 3 ( 1 ) , 3 6 - 4 4 .https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2021167264
  99. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocesses. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman(Eds.). Harvard University.
  100. Utpala Das, IMS Ghaziabad, & Uttar Pradesh (2022), Onlinelearning: Challenges and solutions for learners and teachers.  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X211069501.
  101. Vermunt, J. D. & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in studentlearning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions oflearning and learning orientations. Educational Research PsychologyReview, 16(4), 359-384.
  102. Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, (2010). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530681
  103. Williams, K. C., Cameron, B. A., & Morgan, K. (2012). Supportingonline group projects. NACTA Journal.
  104. Wang Qifu (2013) A study of barriers to online learning in distancee d u c a t i o n i n C h i n a . http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28966/1/601804.pdf.
  105. Warden, C. A., Stanworth, J. O., Ren, J. B., & Warden, A. R.(2013). Synchronous learning best practices: An action researchstudy. Computers & Education, 63, 197-207.
  106. You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions inthe relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education.
  107. Zen, D. (2008). How to be an effective online instructor. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605968.pdf. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.gvsu.edu/docview/61952289?accountid=3947.
  108. Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2009). A cross-cultural studyof online collaborative learning. Multicultural Education &Technology Journal