HomeMabini Review Journalvol. 9 no. 1 (2020)

Sen and Žižek on the Multiculturalist Approach to Non-Violence

Marlon Jesspher De Vera

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This paper analyzes areas of convergence in the works of Amartya Sen and Slavoj Žižek in their criticisms of the multiculturalist approach to non-violence. First, Žižek’s characterization of the liberal discourse of guilt and fear is presented. Then, Sen’s key ideas on multiculturalism, tolerance, and rational critique are explicated. Next, a synthesis of Sen and Žižek’s notions of universality, freedom, and rationality, as well as of their critical conceptions of globalization and anti-globalization are discussed. Subsequently, Sen and Žižek’s divergences on overcoming violence are examined. Lastly, from integrating Sen and Žižek’s thoughts, key theses are provided on the paradoxical character of the multiculturalist approach to non-violence and on how despite their divergences, both Sen and Žižek propose radical systematic changes and an alternative approach to non-violence characterized by the universals of rationality and genuine freedom.



References:

  1. Bufacchi, Vittorio. “Two Concepts of Violence” Political Studies Review 3 (2005): 193-204.
  2. Clark, Kelly James and Kevin Corcoran. “Pluralism, Secularism, and Tolerance.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 3, no. 4 (2000): 627-639.
  3. Escobar, Arturo. “Beyond the Third World: imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 1 (2004): 207-230.
  4. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996.
  5. Mufti, Aamir R. “Critical Secularism: A Reintroduction for Perilous Times.” boundary 2 31, no. 2 (2004): 1-9.
  6. Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1974.
  7. Rawls, John. “The Law of Peoples.” Critical Inquiry 20, no. 1 (1993): 36-68.
  8. Sen, Amartya. “Democracy as a Universal Value” Journal of Democracy 10, no. 3 (1999): 3-17.
  9. Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.,1999.
  10. Sen, Amartya. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006.
  11. Sen, Amartya. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.
  12. Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009.
  13. Ward, Ian. “Democracy after Secularism.” The Good Society 19, no. 2  (2010): 30-36. [134] MABINI REVIEW | Volume IX (2020)
  14. Žižek, Slavoj. “A Plea for Ethical Violence” The Bible and Ethical Theory 1, no. 1 (2004): 02-1-15.
  15. Žižek, Slavoj. “A Plea for Leninist Intolerance” Critical Inquiry 28, no. 2 (Winter 2002): 542-566.
  16. Žižek, Slavoj. “Descartes and the Post-Traumatic Subject” Filozofskivestnik 29, no. 2 (2008):9-29.
  17. Žižek, Slavoj. First as Tragedy, then as Farce, London: Verso, 2009.
  18. Žižek, Slavoj. Violence: Six Sideways Reflections, New York: Picador, 2008.