HomeSocial Sciences and Development Review Journalvol. 13 no. 1 (2021)

The Land Question and Development

Artchil Fernandez

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

There are growing concerns that the social justice provision of the Philippine Constitution where agrarian reform is embedded will be abandoned by future governments intent on market solutions to poverty and late development. This paper disagrees and argues for the need to extend the land reform program in the light of the current issues faced by the country. It contends that agrarian reform is a crucial ingredient to address the late development status of the Philippines. The paper makes it case by first tackling the role of agriculture in development. It next discusses the pathways to economic development with land reform as a vital component. Lastly it argues for the extension of the land reform program as a key component for the development of the Philippines.



References:

  1. Ballesteros, et.al. (2017). The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program after 30 Years: Accomplishments and Forward Options, Discussion Paper Series No. 2017-34. PIDS.
  2. Benarjee, R., Bhattacharya, P. & Ulubasoglu, M.. (2016). Land Reform and Economic Growth: A Century of Evidence from OECD Countries, Paper prepared for presentation at the “2016 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty” The World Bank - Washington DC, March 14-18, 2016.
  3. Carranza, D.. (2015). Agrarian reform and the difficult road to peace in the Philippine countryside. Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Center.
  4. Constantino, R.. (1975). The Philippines: A Past Revisited (Vol. 1), Quezon City. Constantino, R. & Constantino, L.. (1978). The Philippines: The Continuing Past, Quezon City: The Foundation For Nationalist Studies.
  5. Gaido, D.. (2013). The American Path of Bourgeois Development Revisited. Science & Society, Vol. 77, No. 2, April 2013, 227–252.
  6. Johnston, B. & Mellor, J. W. (1961). The Role of Agriculture in Economic Development, The American Economic Review , Sep., 1961, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 566-593
  7. Kellogg, P.. (2019). The Peasant Question and the Russian Revolution: Revisiting Old Orthodoxies. Prepared for the conference, “Marx and Marxism 2019: Marxism without taboos – confronting oppressions,” August 2019, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  8. Lewis, A.W. (1954). Economic Development with unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School, 22 (2):139-191.
  9. Philippine Human Development Report (2005). Peace, Human Security and Human Development in the Philippines, 2nd Edition, Human Development Network (HDN).
  10. PSA. (2022). Urban-Rural Classification. https://psa.gov.ph/tags/urban-rural-classification retrieved 20 April 2022.
  11. Quimba, F.M. &, Estudillo, J. (2018). Sources of income in rural Philippines: the role of population pressure, urbanization and infrastructure development, Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 37-45
  12. Tadem, E.. (2015). Technocracy and the Peasantry: Martial Law Development Paradigms and Philippine Agrarian Reform, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 45, No. 3, 394–418.
  13. Terami-Wada, M. (2014). Sakdalistas’ Struggle for Philippine Independence 1930-1945, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.
  14. World Bank. (2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank.
  15. Wright, S. & Labiste, D.. (2018). Stories of Struggle: Experiences of Land Reform in Negros Island, Philippines, University of the Philippines Press.
  16. Vellema, S., Borras Jr., S., &Lara Jr., F.. (2011). The Agrarian Roots of Contemporary Violent Conflict in Mindanao, Southern Philippines, Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 11 No. 3, July 2011, pp. 298–320.
  17. 1987 Philippine Constitution https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/ retrieved 18 April 2022