HomeScience and Technology Journalvol. 2 no. 1 (2012)

Root Growth Potentials and Morphological Characteristics of Jatropha curcas L. Seedlings from Three Provenances

Joselito I. Rosario | Adrian M. Tulod | Wilfredo M. Carandang | Arturo SA Castillo

Discipline: Forestry and Arboriculture

 

Abstract:

The study was conducted at the Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Nursery, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños to evaluate the quality of Jatropha curcas seedlings raised from three local provenances (Laguna, Palawan and Surigao). Specifically, it assessed the variations in the root growth potential (RGP) of J. curcas seedlings from three provenances; differentiated their morphological attributes; and determined the degree of relationships between their RGP and morphological traits. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replicates. The parameters were RGP, height, root collar diameter (RCD), length of longest root, seedling biomass, rootshoot ratio, and seedling quality index (SQI). Among the three provenances, Laguna provenance produced taller seedlings that had higher RGP than those from Palawan and Surigao. This indicates that those from Laguna could be genetically superior than the other two provenances. No provenance variations were observed on the RCD, length of longest roots, seedling biomass, shootroot ratio, and SQI. In addition, all the seedlings, regardless of provenance, were top heavy and could be susceptible to moisture stress and desiccation when outplanted in drought prone areas. Seedling height and RCD were correlated with all the morphological traits, except shoot-root ratio. This means that either height or RCD can be used to estimate the other morphological traits of J. curcas seedlings. Additionally, RGP is positively correlated with all the morphological traits, except shoot-root ratio. Likewise, a strong positive correlation was observed between SQI and all the morphological attributes of the J. curcas seedlings.



References:

  1. Carandang, W.M. (1994) Lateral root development and seedling performance of large leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. CFNR, UPLB College, Laguna. 130pp.
  2. ECOSYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUREAU. (1998). Development and Management of Forest Plantations: A Guidebook. DENR-ERDB. College, Laguna. 208pp.
  3. Gazal, R.M., Blanche, C.A., and Carandang, W.M. (2004). Root growth potential and seedling morphological attributes of narra (Pterocarpus indicus Willd.) transplants. Forest Ecology and Management 195: 259–266.
  4. Haase, D.L. (2007). Morphological and physiological evaluations of seedling quality. In: Riley, L. E.; Dumroese, R. K.; Landis, T. D., tech. coords. 2007. National proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2006. Proc. RMRS-P-50. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
  5. Haase, D.L. (Undated). Understanding forest seedling quality: Measurements and interpretation. Tree Planters’ Notes 52 ( 2): 24 – 30.
  6. Hawkins, B. (1996). Planting stock quality assessment. In: Yapa, A. C. (Ed). International Symposium on Recent Advances in Tropical Seed Technology and Planting Stock Production. ASEAN Forest Tree Seed Centre, Muak-Lek, Saraburi, Thailand. pp. 107 – 111.
  7. Jaenicke, H. (1999). Tree nursery practices: Practical guidelines for research nurseries. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry. Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from: http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/NurseryManuals Community/ SeedQuality.pdf, Oct. 6, 2008
  8. Manahay, H.B.G. (2010). Growth and survival of nursery-grown tubing-bakod (Jatropha curcas L.) as affected by types and rates of fertilizer. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. MMSU, Batac, Ilocos Norte. 56pp.
  9. May, J.T. (Undated). Seedling quality, grading, culling and counting. Retrieved from: https://fp.auburn.edu/sfws/sfnmc/class/handbook/chapter9.pdf , October 13, 2008.
  10. Mullan, G.D. and White, P.J. (2001). Seedling Quality: Making informed choices. Bushcare and the Department of Conservation and Land Management.
  11. O’reilly, C., Keane, M. and Morrissey, N. (2002). The importance of plant size for successful forest plantation establishment. COFORD Connects Reproductive Material No. 5.
  12. Ritchie, G.A. (1985). Root growth potential: Principles, procedures and predictive ability. In: Duryea, M. L. (ed.). Proc.: Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests. Workshop held Oct. 16-18, 1984. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Retrieved from: http://www.rngr.net/Publications/evaluating/PDF.2003-10-27.0620/file , Oct. 6, 2008.
  13. Ritchie, G.A. (1984). Assessing seedling quality. In: Duryea. M. L., and T. D. Landis (eds.). 1984. Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bare Root Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers. The Hague/Boston/Lancaster, for Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University. Corvallis. 386 p. Accessed via the Internet at: http://www.rngr.net/Publications/fnm/Chapter%2023/file , October 13, 2008.48
  14. Rowan, S. J. (1987). Nursery seedling quality affects growth and survival in out-plantings. Georgia Forest Research Paper No. 70. Research Division, Georgia Forestry Commission.
  15. South, D. (2000). Planting morphologically improved pine seedlings to increase survival and growth. Forestry and Wildlife Research Series 1. 14p.
  16. South, D. and Mexal, J.G. (1984). Growing the “best” seedling for reforestation success. Forestry Departmental Series No. 12. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Auburn University, Alabama.
  17. Tinus, R.W., Burr, K.E., Atzmon, N. and Riov, J. (2000). Relationship between carbohydrate concentration and root growth potential in coniferous seedlings from three climates during cold hardening and dehardening. Tree Physiology 20: 1097-1104.
  18. WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTER. (2008). Seedling quality. Accessed via the Internet at: http://www.worldagroforestry.