Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 15 no. 4 (2023)

Online News Coverage of COVID-19 in the Philippines: A Media Framing Study

Percie Joy Gelera | Mary Ann E. Tarusan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored how the COVID-19 pandemic was framed in the Philippine media during its initial stage. Specifically, it determined the dominant frames and tones used and identified emerging themes in the online news coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using qualitative content analysis, 72 online news articles published from March 1 to April 30, 2020, from the websites of the three chosen media companies–ABS-CBN News, GMA News, and INQUIRER.net were analyzed. The news articles were sampled using a consecutive 6-day sampling technique. Additionally, 18 news articles were purposively chosen from the total samples to examine emerging themes further. A contextualized news article analysis form was used to determine the dominant frames and tones, and the techniques of open and axial coding were used to identify emerging themes manually. The result shows that the dominant frame and tone were the human interest frame and neutral tone, respectively. Further, five themes emerged from the analysis: Scientific Accounts, Misinformation and Fake News, Discrimination and Harassment, New Normal, and Community Support. The findings provide significant insights into how COVID-19 was framed in the Philippine media. It also revealed possible unique themes Filipino journalists use in presenting health crises.



References:

  1. An, S.-K., & Gower, K. K. (2009). How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisisnews coverage. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.010
  2. Anwar, A., Malik, M., Raees, V., & Anwar, A. (2020). Role of Mass Media and Public HealthCommunications in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus, 12(9), e10453. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10453
  3. Arowolo, S. O. (2017). Understanding Framing Theory. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25800.52482
  4. Beaudoin, C. E. (2007). SARS News Coverage and Its Determinants in China and the US. International Communication Gazette, 69(6), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048507082839
  5. Bernadas, J. M. A. C., & Ilagan, K. (2020). Journalism, public health, and COVID-19: some preliminaryinsights from the Philippines. Media International Australia, 177(1), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20953854
  6. Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Medsurg Nursing : Official Journal ofthe Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 25(6), 435–436.
  7. Corpuz, J. C. G. (2021). Adapting to the culture of “new normal”: an emerging response to COVID-19.Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 43(2), e344–e345. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab057
  8. Gadekar, R., Krishnatray, P., & Ang, P. H. (2014). Framing of the H1N1 Flu in an Indian Newspaper.Journal of Creative Communications, 9(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258613517438
  9. Griffin, E. (2012). Agenda-Setting Theory of Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw. In A First Look atCommunication Theory (8th ed., pp. 378–390). McGraw-Hill.
  10. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  11. Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., Beets, B., & Brossard, D. (2020). Fact-checking as risk communication: themulti-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8),1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385
  12. Machungo, F. G. (2012). Trends and content of media coverage of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa bythree influential U.S. newspapers, 1983--2008 [University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign]. https://core.ac.uk/reader/4838810
  13. Madarang, C. R. S. (2020, March 12). Metro Manila residents are panic buying amid COVID-19. Why they do it and why they shouldn’t. Interaksyon News.(DOI) 18
  14. Mutua, S. N., & Ong’ong’a, D. O. (2020). Online News Media Framing of COVID-19 Pandemic:Probing the Initial Phases of the Disease Outbreak in International Media. European Journal ofInteractive Multimedia and Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/8402
  15. Ogbodo, J. N., Onwe, E. C., Chukwu, J., Nwasum, C. J., Nwakpu, E. S., Nwankwo, S. U., Nwamini, S.,Elem, S., & Iroabuchi Ogbaeja, N. (2020). Communicating health crisis: a content analysis ofglobal media framing of COVID-19. Health Promotion Perspectives, 10(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2020.40
  16. Ophir, Y. (2018). Coverage of Epidemics in American Newspapers Through the Lens of the Crisis andEmergency Risk Communication Framework. Health Security, 16(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0106
  17. Riffe, D., Aust, C. F., & Lacy, S. R. (1993). The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day andConstructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1),133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000115
  18. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
  19. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. V. (2000). Framing European politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
  20. Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653
  21. Subingsubing, K. (2021, May 4). ABS-CBN’s Ordeal and Its “chilling” Effect’ on Media. PhilippineDaily Inquirer. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1427319/abs-cbns-ordeal-and-its-chilling-effect-on-media
  22. Thomas, T., Wilson, A., Tonkin, E., Miller, E. R., & Ward, P. R. (2020). How the Media PlacesResponsibility for the COVID-19 Pandemic—An Australian Media Analysis. Frontiers in PublicHealth, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00483
  23. Uribe, M. R. (2020). Framing of Online News Coverage of the Coronavirus in the United States. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 11(2), 89–98. https://eloncdn.blob.core.windows.net/eu3/sites/153/2020/12/09-RamirezuribefinalEJ.pdf
  24. Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S.,Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015
  25. Volkmer, I. (2021). Social Media & COVID-19: A Global Study of Digital Crisis Interaction among Gen Z and Millennials. University of Melbourne. https://arts.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/3958684/Volkmer-Social-Media-and-COVID.pdf (DOI) 19
  26. Wong, A., Ho, S., Olusanya, O., Antonini, M. V., & Lyness, D. (2021). The use of social media andonline communications in times of pandemic COVID-19. Journal of the Intensive Care Society,22(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143720966280
  27. Xi, Y., Chen, A., & Ng, A. (2021). Conditional transparency: Differentiated news framings of COVID-19 severity in the pre-crisis stage in China. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0252062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252062
  28. Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
  29. Zhang, X., Bie, B., & Billings, A. C. (2017). Newspaper Ebola articles differ from Twitter updates.Newspaper Research Journal, 38(4), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532917739883

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic