Overcoming the Politics of Fear and the Role of Liberal Education in the Filipino Youth&rsquo;s Formation of Political Emotion

Gerlie  C. Ogatis,

Overcoming the Politics of Fear and the Role of Liberal Education in the Filipino Youth’s Formation of Political Emotion

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

Emotion is seen as an uncritical force that can bring detriment in shaping the political terrain of the land. Historically, emotions are seen as negative political vectors that promote uncritical and unthinking culture among the citizens of a given political community. The Philippines as a country has its dilemma when it comes to nurturing negative emotions of some kind; what is rampant in its political landscape is the negative emotions of fear, shame, and disgust. The danger of sustaining negative emotions can be present in the political atmosphere of many societies around the world. Its detriment is extended to the formation of political emotion among the younger generations. This study intends to pay serious attention to the possibility of redirecting the political emotions of the youth into the formation of positive kinds through a careful analysis of the potential role of liberal education. Our current approaches to civic education do not yet account for the emotional basis of citizenship that will generate the formation of a positive political culture. Eliminating negative emotions requires a sensible analysis of the factors that contribute to its polarized direction. We live in a time where the generation of politics of fear is rampant among civic leaders. Negative emotion in our political sphere needs to be addressed by cultivating a culture of emotion characterized by compassion and care. Thus, this study sees it imperative to inculcate positivity among the youths at present to better shape the future of our country’s political culture.

References:

Adarlo, G. (2016). (Re)framing citizenship education in the Philippines: A twentyfirst century imperative. The Good Society, Penn State University Press, 25 (2-3), 256-288.
Alcala, A. (1991). Higher Education in the Philippines. Philippine Studies, 47 (1), 114-128.
Arguelles, C.A. (2020). Rethinking Filipino Millennials: Alternative Perspectives on a Misunderstood Generation. Apathetic millennials: The personal politics of today’s young people. https://www.academia.edu/44860421/Apathetic_millennials_The_personal_politics_of_todays_young_people?from=cover_page
Bayod, R. (2020). Legacies of Love, Peace, and Hope. “The Democratic and Moral Deficit of the Philippine Educational System.” Eubios Ethics Institute, 116-117.
Claudio, L.E. (2015). Colonial Miseducation Internationalism and Deweyan Pedagogy in the American-era Philippines. Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints, 63 (2), 193-221.
Deinla, I., Mendoza, G.A.S., Ballar, K.J., & Yap, J. (2021). The link between fake news susceptibility and political polarization of the youth in the Philippines. Available at SSRN 3964492.
Deslauriers, M. and Destr´ee, P. (2013). The Cambridge Companion to ARISTOTLE’S POLITICS. Cambridge University Press, 211.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. In Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith (Eds.). Published by.Lawrence and Wishart, 20-25.
Horner, L. (2022). Oscillating between populism and liberalism in the Philippines: Participatory education’s role in addressing stubborn inequalities. Globalisation, Societies and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2048799
Hunt, L. (2006). Martha Nussbaum on the emotions. Ethics, 116 (3), 552-577. https://doi.org/10.1086/498465. Lopez, M. L. (2022, February 8). 56% of May 2022 voters part of the youth – Comelec. CNN News. Retrieved April 18, 2023, from http://www.cnnphilippines.com/news/2022/2/8/youthvote-56- percent-2022.html
Nussbaum, M. (1985). Finely aware and richly responsible: Moral attention and the moral task of literature. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(10), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026358
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2004). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, and species membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2004). Hiding from humanity, disgust, shame and the law. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2013). Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2012). The new religious intolerance: Overcoming the politics of fear in an anxious age. USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Ranada, P. (2021, December 28). 2022, the year to be political. Rappler Blogs. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://www.rappler.com/voices/rappler-blogs/2022-year-to-be-political/
Rice, J. P. (2006). What Should We be Teaching? Nussbaum, Seneca, and the Liberal Arts. Modern Language Studies, 36(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/27647881
Smith, R. (1993). Arts education as liberal education. The Journal of Education, 175 (3), 1-14.
Timberman, David G. (2015). A changeless land: Continuity and change in Philippine Politics. New York: Published by Routledge, 3-8.
Weis, M. (2017). Resistance and resilience: Coping with/against the state. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 374-404.
Zymdelas, M. (2013). Revisiting the Gramscian legacy on counter-hegemony, the subaltern and affectivity: Toward an ‘Emotional Pedagogy’ of activism in higher education. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.14426/cristal.v1i1.2