HomeDangal Research Journalvol. 2 no. 1 (2020)

Student Outcomes Assessment System for Pamantasan ng Cabuyao

Jasper P Diongco | Anna Vida H Lopez | Rich Lhyne O Rebana

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The adaptation and shift from traditional teaching m ethods to outcom e -based education wherein decision about curriculum are driven by the ex it learning outcom es that the student displa y at the end of the course. Assessm ent of lea rning outcom es is an im portant aspect of any educational landscape. At every point in a stud ent’s life, they face assessm ent it is an inseparable part of every student’s ca reer trajectory that becom es a lens for understand ing student lea rning and identifying invisible barriers, and helps to im prove tea ching approaches. In this stud y, researchers developed a system entitled “Student Outcom es Assessm ent System for Pamantasan ng Cabuyao”. The system is useful in a way that it would help the university to improve the current practices in t erms of m anaging the curriculum and mapping of the curriculum in respective stud ent outcom es. The system desire outcom e is to help and contribute improvement of the university courses instructional program s a nd ensuring that outcome achieved is aligned with the m ission and vision of the university.



References:

  1. Mrunal Mahajan, Mavinder Kaur Sarjit Signh, “Importance and Benefits of Learning Outcomes,” March 2017. J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73
  2. Scott, “Multiple Choice Questions: Benefits, Debates, and Best Practices,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://blog.gutenberg-technology.com/en/multiple-choice-questions.
  3. Xu, Kauer and Tupy, “Multiple-choice questions:Tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online,” 2016.
  4. Weimer, “Multiple-Choice Tests: Revisiting the Pros and Cons,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/multiple-choice-tests-pros-cons/.M. Young, The
  5. Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
  6. Rao, Prasad, Sajitha, Permi and Shetty, “Item analysis of multiple choice questions: Assessing an assessment tool in medical students,” International Journal of Educational and Psychological Research, 2016.
  7. Christian, Prajapati, Rana and Dave, “Evaluation of multiple choice questions using item analysis tool,” 2017.
  8. Tolulope, “Exam Software: Benefits of Computer Based Assessment,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://avalanchenigeria.com/Blog/Exam_Software_Benefits_of_Computer_Based_Testing
  9. Rawle, Bowen, Murck and Hong, “Curriculum Mapping Across the Disciplines: Differences, Approaches, and Strategies,” 2017
  10. “Descriptive Research: Defining Your Respondents and Drawing Conclusions,” 2014. [Online]. Available: http://fluidsurveys.com/university/descriptive-research-defining-respondents-drawing-conclusions/
  11. Abdallah and Jones, “Successful Use of Performance Indicators to Assess Student Outcomes,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/16133/view
  12. N. Kasturi, Survey: Designing Curriculum for Outcome Based, 2017, p. 418.
  13. “Curriculum mapping,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.stthomas.edu/accreditation-assessment/assessment-bestpractices/curriculummapping/
  14. “Curriculum mapping: A toolkit,” National Institution for Learning Outcomes Assessment, 2018.
  15. “Student learning objectives,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.myuea.org/members_only/teaching_learning/student_learning_objectives.aspx
  16. Abreu, Silva and Gomes, “Multiple-choice questions in programming courses,” 2018.
  17. Bobde, Chaudhari, Golguri and Shahane, “Web based online examination system,” GRD Journals-Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 2017.
  18. Castillo, “A paradigm shift to outcomes-based higher education: Policies, principles and preparations,” 2014.
  19. Chai and Alomran, “Automated scoring system for multiple choice test with quick feedback,” International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 2018.
  20. Fowler, “Student learning outcomes: A primer,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/student-learning-outcomes-primer/
  21. Irvine, “Curriculum mapping and assessment mapping,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.chalkandwire.com/curriculum-mapping-improve-higher-education-learning/
  22. Joyner, “Curriculum mapping: A method to assess and refine undergraduate degree programs,” 2016.
  23. Kasturi, “Survey: Designing curriculum for outcome based education,” 2017.
  24. Macayan, “Implementating outcome-based education (OBE) framework: Implications for assessment of students' performance,” 2017.
  25. Tshai, Ho, Yap and Ng, “Outcome-based education – The assessment of programme educational objectives for an engineering undergraduate degree,” A Journal of the Higher Education Academy, 2015.
  26. Student learning objectives. (2019). Retrieved from Utah Educational Association: http://www.myuea.org/members_only/teaching_learning/student_learning_objectives.aspx.