HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 5 no. 3 (2024)

Implementation of Work Immersion in the New Normal: Basis for Students’ Quality Performance and Satisfaction

Democrito C. Cabile Jr

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study evaluated the implementation of work immersion in the new normal, students' quality performance, and work immersion satisfaction. The relationship between variables and the mediating effect of students' quality performance between work immersion implementation and student satisfaction was also investigated. Adherence, exposure, quality of delivery in terms of work immersion curriculum, work immersion processes, and work immersion assessment, as well as participant responsiveness, were used to assess the extent of work immersion implementation. In addition, the level of satisfaction among students was evaluated using Task values (attainment value, intrinsic value, utility value, and cost); Motivation factors (work itself, achievement, and responsibility); and Hygiene factors (administrative policies, supervision, interpersonal, and working conditions). On the other hand, students’ quality performance was gauged base on teamwork, communication, attendance/punctuality, productivity/resilience, initiative/proactivity, judgement/ decision-making, and dependability. Respondents are Grade 12 students from public secondary schools in the SDO Tayabas who have participated in actual work immersion activities in an authentic workplace. The structured questionnaire was created and validated to collect data from respondents via Google Forms to determine the extent of the research variables and their association. These data were analyzed to obtain reliable and valid study results. The study's findings revealed that work immersion program implementation is significantly related to student satisfaction. Work immersion program implementation is significant to student quality performance; student satisfaction creates a relationship with work immersion program implementation. The mediation analysis results indicate that the overall student’s quality performance can transmit the effect of influenced implementation of work immersion, which increases student Satisfaction. Also, partial mediation exists considering the extent of the mediating effect of students' quality performance between the work immersion implementation and the students' satisfaction with work immersion. This is due to the analysis that the work immersion implementation as the independent variable significantly affects a mediating variable, which is the students' quality performance. The students' quality performance as the mediating variable has a direct impact on the students' satisfaction with work immersion as the independent variable.



References:

  1. Brandon, J. J., & Amarasinghe, M. F. and G. (2021, January 21). Work Immersion: re-al-world experience at senior high. The Asia Foundation. https://asiafoundation.org/publication/work-immersion-real-world experience-at-senior-high/.
  2. Caraig, G. A. (2018). Internship performance and level of satisfaction of student train-ees in industry immersion program. Int. J. Rec. Innov. Acad. Res, 2(5), 165- 175
  3. Cruz, K. (2022, May 5). DepEd strengthens physical work immersion for SHS students. The Manila Times. Retrieved October 18, 2022, from https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/05/05/campus-press/deped-strengthens-physical-work-immersion-for-shs-students/1842449
  4. Diokno, M. S. I. (2021). Learning in a Time of Pandemic. COVID-19:EveryWoman’s Fem-inist Response and Recovery Plan, 67.
  5. DO 30, s. 2017 – Guidelines for Work Immer-sion. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/06/05/do-30-s-2017-guidelines-for-work im-mersion/.
  6. Durlak, J. (2013). The importance of quality implementation for research, practice, and policy. ASPE. Retrieved October 1, 2022, from https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/importance-quality-implementation-research-practice-policy-0
  7. Guimba, G. A. F. (2019). Work-Related Self-Efficacy and Work Immersion Satisfac-tion among Grade 12 General Academic Strand Students of Trece Martires City Senior High School SY 2017-2018. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidis-ciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2N).
  8. Jaradat, G. M. (2017). Internship training in computer science: Exploring student sat-isfaction levels. Evaluation and Program Planning, 63, 109– 115.
  9. Kaseorg, M., & Pukkonen, L. (2015). Roles and satisfaction during internship program in Estonian universities. Analele stiintifice ale Universitatii “Al. I. Cuza” din Iasi. Sti-inte economice/Scientific Annals of the" Al. I. Cuza", 62(1).
  10. Khanna, V. (2017). Measuring job satisfaction 0f academicians using Herzberg theo-ry. Delhi Business Review, 18(2), 75-86.
  11. LIU, D., ZHANGYANG, Y., SONG, Y., HE, C., & XIE, Y. (2019). Immersion experience of medical students and related influencing factors. Chinese Journal of Medical Edu-cation Research, 742-745.
  12. Lu, W. C., & Kuo, C.-C. (2016). Internship per-formance and satisfaction in sports: Ap-plication of the proactive motivation model. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 18, 33– 41.
  13. Malipot, M. H. (2022, October 17). 5 days of in-person classes mandatory for all public schools starting Nov. 2 --- DepEd. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2022/10/17/5-days-of-in-person-classes-mandatory-for-all-public-schools-starting-nov-2-deped/
  14. McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Foster-ing conceptual change about child devel-opment in prospective teachers and other college students. Child Development Per-spectives, 2(2), 85-91.
  15. Ronda, R. A. (2018, January 24). DepEd banks on partnerships for SHS work immersion. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/other-sections/education-and-home/2018/01/25/1781082/deped-banks-partnerships-shs-work-immersion.
  16. Sihombing, I. H. H. (2021). The influence of individual factors on hospitality students' internship satisfaction: The mediation role of perceived importance. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 26(1), 9-21.
  17. Stangor, C., & Walinga, J. (2019). 3.5 psycholo-gists use descriptive, correlational, and experimental research designs to under-stand behaviour. Introduction to Psychol-ogy.
  18. Syptak, J. M., Marsland, D. W., & Ulmer, D. (1999). Job satisfaction: Putting theory into practice. Family practice manage-ment, 6(9), 26.
  19. To, W. M., & Lung, J. W. (2020). Factors influ-encing internship satisfaction among Chi-nese students. Education+ Training