Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 4 (2024)

Development and Evaluation of an Optimized Energy Recovery System from Excess Heat of a Compressed Air System

Andrew S. Mañego

 

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to build a bounded optimized energy recovery system from the compressed air system’s excess heat. It is important to concentrate on the use of products that satisfy the requirements for performance and sustainability, as well as the need for energy that will be optimized. Purposive sampling is used to select the respondents, using quantitative research, specifically both descriptive and developmental methods. The researcher utilized a decision support tool developed by Kolaitis et al., (2020) as the primary research instrument of the study. The adopted tool was slightly modified to suit the assessment needs of the developed energy utilization system. All the main criteria components are interpreted as highly sustainable. The researcher utilized log sheets to determine the performance of the study. Finally, paired t-test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference in the performance of the study. The performance of the optimized energy after the implementation of the project was statistically higher than the performance of the optimized energy before the implementation of the project. The researcher concluded that the performance of the optimized energy recovery system from excess heat of a compressed air system after the installation and operation was effective and efficient based on the ratings of respondents and descriptive measures on the log sheet. For this kind of innovation, the manufacturing company with the same equipment should adopt and sustain it for potential energy savings and protect mother nature.



References:

  1. Abaya, L. M., Dela Cruz, J., & Clarence Llobera, C. (2023). Bridging the Conventions: Ef-fects of Modular Approach in Teaching Elementary Grades. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 4(6), 1955 – 1962. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.06.21
  2. Agasen, A. C., Cabardo, R. E., Lapuz, M. C. M., & Alvarez, M. M. (2022). Comparative Anal-ysis of the Expectation and Willingness of the Hei’s Stakeholders in Manila for Lim-ited Face-To-Face Classes.
  3. Barrera L., Gomez, A. C., Padernos, J. L. F., Jr. P. P. V., Espinosa, M. J. G. (2022). The Expe-riences of Selected Teachers in Dasma-rinas City During the Initial Implementa-tion of Online Distance Learning (ODL) in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 3 (3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.03.09
  4. Bustillo, E., & Aguilos, M. (2022). The Chal-lenges of Modular Learning in the Wake of COVID-19: A Digital Divide in the Phil-ippine Countryside Revealed. Education Sciences, 12(7), 449.
  5. Castroverde, F., & Acala, M. (2021). Modular distance learning modality: Challenges of teachers in teaching amid the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Re-search Studies in Education, 10(8), 7-15.
  6. DepEd Memorandum No. 30, s. 2022. Dissemi-nation of the Revised School Safety As-sessment Tool for the Progressive expan-sion of the Face to Face Classes. Re-trieved on 3rd September, 2022 from https://www.deped.gov.ph./
  7. DepEd Order No. 17, s. 2022. Guidelines on the Progressive Expansion of Face-to-Face Classes. Retrieved on 3rd September, 2022 from https://www.deped.gov.ph./
  8. DepEd Order No. 34, s. 2022. School Calendar and Activities for School Year 2022-2023. Retrieved on 3rd September, 2022 from https://www.deped.gov.ph./
  9. DepEd Order no. 35 s. 2022. Guidelines on En-rolment for SY (School Year) 2022-2023 in the context of re-introducing the In-person Classes. Retrieved on 3rd Septem-ber, 2022 from https://www.deped.gov.ph./
  10. Gamboa, J. N. (2022). I Survived: Academic Life of Junior High School Learners in Online Distance Learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Busi-ness and Education Research. 3(5), 828 – 841. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.05.11
  11. Garcia, M. I., Caraig, D. J., Carator, K., Oyco, M. T., Tababa, G. A., Linaugo, J., & De Oca, P. R. (2022). Influence of Gadget Dependen-cy on the Academic Procrastination Lev-els of Grade 12 STEM Students. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research. 3 (6), 1197 – 1210. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.06.22
  12. Gay, A. J. (1992). Basic statistics. Manila: Rex Book Store.
  13. Gopez J. M. W. (2021). Cautious and gradual reopening of limited face-to-face classes in Philippine tertiary schools. Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 43(2), e356–e357. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab060
  14. Harumi, D. S. I., & Pambudi, D. I. (2022). Im-plementation of Face-to-Face Learning after the Covid-19 Pandemic: Case Study at SD Muhammadiyah Pakel, Yogyakarta. International Journal of Learning Refor-mation in Elementary Education, 1(01), 12-20.
  15. Jackaria, P. M. (2022). Elementary teachers’ experiences and instructional challenges during the return to school after the COVID-19 closure in the Philippines. In-ternational Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(2), 216-225.
  16. Joint Memorandum Circular no. 001, s. 2022. Revised Operational Guidelines on the Progressive Expansion of Face-to-Face Learning Modality. Retrieved on 3rd Sep-tember, 2022 from https://www.deped.gov.ph./
  17. NU.CEPAL & UNESCO (2020). Education in the time of COVID-19. Retrieved from 15th August, 2022 from https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/45905-education-time-covid-19
  18. Olivio, M. G. (2021). Parents’ Perception on Printed Modular Distance Learning in Canarem Elementary School: Basis for Proposed Action Plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 2(4), 296 – 309. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.04.03
  19. Riva, E., Freeman, R., Schrock, L., Jelicic, V., Özer, C. T., & Caleb, R. (2020). Student wellbeing in the teaching and learning environment: a study exploring student and staff perspectives. Higher Education Studies, 10(4), 103-115.
  20. Sarmiento, P., Sarmiento, C., & Tolentino, R. (2021). Face-to-face classes during COVID-19: a call for deliberate and well-planned school health protocols in the Philippine context. Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 43(2), e305–e306. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab006
  21. Sulasmi, E. (2022). Implementation of Face-to-face Learning (Analysis of Readiness of Parents, Learners, and Education Units in Bengkulu City). Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(02).
  22. Valenzuela, e. S., & Buenvinida, L. P. (2021). Managing School Operations and Re-sources in the New Normal and Perfor-mance of Public Schools in one School Division in the Philippines. IOER Interna-tional Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(5).
  23. Yambot, R. L., Ayro, E. C., & Vidal Jr., E. S. (2023). Teachers’ Challenges and Readi-ness of the School on the Implementation of Expanded Face-to-face Classes. Inter-national Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research. 4(7), 2482 – 2502. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.26.
  24. Zhan, Z., Li, Y., Yuan, X. et al. (2021) To Be or Not to Be: Parents’ Willingness to Send Their Children Back to School After the COVID-19 Outbreak. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 31, 589–600 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00610-9

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic