HomeASLP Journalvol. 3 no. 1 (2017)

Antecedents of Searching Satisfaction: A Usability Study of an Online Public Access Catalog

John Louie Zabala | Lovely Secretaria | Thalia Marie Deonoso | Anotenette Bayarcal

 



References:

  1. Beheshti, J. (1992). Browsing through public access catalogs. Information Technology and Libraries, 11(3), 220. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215838408?accountid=33262
  2. Borgman, C. L. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986-1998), 47(7), 493. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216901029?accountid=33262
  3. Halcoussis, D., Halverson, A. L., Lowenberg, A. D., & Lowenberg, S. (2002). An empirical analysis of web catalog user experiences. Information Technology and Libraries, 21(4), 148-157. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215829860?accountid=33262
  4. Jääskeläinen, R. (2010). Think-aloud protocol.Handbook of translation studies, 1, 371-373.
  5. Madhusudhan, M., & Aggarwal, S. (2011). Web-based online public access catalogues of IIT libraries in india: An evaluative study. Program, 45(4), 415-438. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/0033033111118210
  6. Ruzegea, M. (2012). The usability of OPAC interface features: The perspective of postgraduate students at international islamic university malaysia (IIUM). Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-20. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1014176020?accountid=33262
  7. Truong, D. L., & Liew, C. L. (2009). The evaluation of new zealand academic library OPACs: A checklist approach. The Electronic Library, 27(3), 376-393. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640470910966844
  8. Yee, M. (1991). "System Design and Cataloging Meet the User: User Interfaces to online public access catalogs." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (2), 78-98.