Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 16 no. 4 (2023)

Elected Officials' Governance on Educational Projects as Influenced by Their Leadership Aptitudes and Styles

Janette Dejano | Bayani Dejano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aims to determine the good governance of CHICKS/Provincial elected officials in education as influenced by their leadership aptitude, style and educational programs. There were ninety (90) office staff rated elected officials in terms of their efficacy and effectiveness accountability, rule of law, and Transparency. Respondents of the study include twenty (20) elected officials with a Bachelors degree and one (1) graduate of a (2- year course). Findings revealed that elected officials have a competence. Elected official leadership aptitude as to their location, generally, they are all competent. I Elected officials manifest all leadership style as to their location in terms of Transformational, cross-cultural, Laissez fair leadership and transactional. Male elected officials are using transformational, cross- cultural and laissez-fair type of leadership but not transactional. Females are not using Laissez-faire leadership, the most critical annual goals were not met. Municipality and of Ilog Cauayan were the location that implemented all their educational projects and programs. The project that has been accomplished by the elected officials will depend on the kind of governance they are practicing. In governance, elected officials are using, transformational, laissez-faire, and transactional the same with their aptitude, it is conform to what kind of leadership they are using and as well as in implementation of projects.



References:

  1. Badures, Katie L. (2018). Gender and Leadership Emergence: A meta analysis and explanatory model.
  2. Bailey, Sebastian (2014). Who makes a better leader; A man or a woman?
  3. Bekker, Michiel C. (2014). Project Governance – The Definition and Leadership Dillema.
  4. Bell, Clement & Mjoli, Themba (2013). The effects of participative leadership on organizational commitment: Comparing its effects on two gender groups among bank clerks.
  5. Besley, Timothy & Montalvo, Jose G., et al (2011). Do Educated Leaders Matter?
  6. Biddle, Mathew (August, 2018). Men are still more likely than women to be perceived as leaders.
  7. BILLIG, M., (2015). Kurt Lewin’s leadership studies and his legacy to social psychology: is there nothing as practical as a good theory? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(4), pp.440-460.
  8. Bogert, Sherry. The Use of Situational Leadership Theory
  9. Boerrigter, Carlijn (2015). How leader’s age is related to leader effectiveness. Through leader’s affective state and leadership behavior.
  10. Bovens, Mark (2003). Public Accountability.
  11. Capistrano, Francis Y. (September, 2017). The Road to Fiscal Transparency in the Philippines.
  12. Carrington, Wesley, DeBuse, Jim, et al (May, 2008). The Theory of Governance and Accountability.
  13. Cavazotte, Flávia, Moreno, Valter, et al (2013). Transformational Leaders and Work Performance: The Mediating Roles of Identification and Self-efficacy.
  14. Challenges for bused learning in Public: A Behavioral Perspective on Reformation Information use, 2017.
  15. Chaudry, Abdul Q. & Javed, Husnain (2012). Impact of Transactional and Laissez Faire Leadership Style on Motivation.
  16. Chemla, Emmanuel (2008). Transparency Theory: Empirical Issues and Psycholinguistic Routes.
  17. Danley, Bryan & Nakita, James, et al. Behaviorism Theory and its Relation to Instructional Design. CRAIG SWANSON © www.perspecuity.com
  18. Diaz-Serrano, L. (2018). Do more Educated Leaders Revise Citizen Education.
  19. Dr. Schoech (January, 2006). Contingency Theory. UTA School of Social Work, Community and Administrative Practice, pp. 1-4.
  20. Eckmann, Helen L. Great Man Theory: A personal account of attraction.
  21. Forbes, Melissa (2007). Governance and Organizational Effectiveness: Toward a Theory of Government Performance.
  22. Graham, Gordon (2005). Philosophy of the Arts.
  23. Grant, Ruth W., Keohane, Robert O. (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.
  24. Great Man Theory. thehumanelement.com/leadership. ©Syque 2002-2009.
  25. Good Governance – the concept.
  26. Huil, Michael (2014). Critical View on Leibestein’s X-Efficiency Theory.
  27. Kanodia, Rekha & Sacher, Arun (December, 2016). Trait Theories of Leadership. www.conferencewsorld.in
  28. Katsamunska, Polya (2016). The Concept of Governance and Public Governance Theoriess. Economic Alternatives, Issue 2, 2016.
  29. Kelley, C. P. (2014). The power of identity in important leadership decisions.
  30. Kunhert, Karl W. (1987). Transactional and Transformational Leadership: A Constructive/Developmental Analysis.
  31. Luft, Kathlee A. (2012). A Research Study of Transformational Leadership Comparing Leadership Style of the Principal.
  32. Manasan, Rosario G., et al (1999). Indicators of Good Governance: Developing an Index of Governance Quality at the LGU Level.
  33. Mohammed Al Moliki, Wang Juan (2018). Impact of Laissez-faire Leadership on Pole Ambiguity and Pole Conflict: Implications for Job Performance.
  34. Nicola, Pless M., et al (2011). Responsible Leadership: Pathways to the Future.
  35. Odugbemi, Sina & Lee, Taeku (2011). Accountability through Public Opinion: From Inertia to Pubic Action.
  36. Patel, Gita (2013). Gender Differences in Leadership Styles and the Impact within Corporate Boards.
  37. Perrels, Adriaan (October, 2001). Efficiency and Effectiveness of Policy Instruments: Concepts and Pratice.
  38. Principe, Michael L. (2000). Albert Venn Dicey and the Principles of the Rule of Law: Is Justice Blind? A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Great Britain.
  39. Rego and Simpson (2018). The Perceived Impact of Leader’s Humanity on Team Effectiveness: An Empirical Study.
  40. Ruleof Law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ARule_of_law
  41. Simpson, Jeffry A., Farrel, Allison K., et al (2014). Power and Social Influence in Relationships.
  42. Scheafer, Beth (2015). On Becoming a Leader: Building Relationship and Creating Communities.
  43. Schneider, Robert C. (2012). Affective Leadership of Sport Management through Political Astuteness.
  44. Shrivastava, Amartya (2015). Theory of Transparency: The Right To Know.
  45. Stoker, Gerry (2002). Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. ©UNESCO 1998
  46. Storr, Lorna (2014). “Leading with Integrity: A quantitative research study”, Journal of Health Organization and Management, Volume 18, Issue 6 pp-415-434.
  47. Sturin, Rachel E., et al (2016). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance.
  48. Subedi, Nahakul. Rule of Law: Principles and Practices.
  49. The Concept and Theories of GovernanceTheories of Law: Natural Law, Legal Positivism, The Morality of Law, Dworkin’s “Third Theory of Law”, Legal Realism and Critical Legal Studies.
  50. Waduge, C.S. (2011). Governance and Performance: An Empirical Study of Australian Universities.
  51. Winkler, Ingo (2010). Role of Theory Leadership

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic