HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 16 no. 5 (2023)

Enhancing the Comprehension Skills of Grade 6 Learners Using Project ARISE (Acquisition of Reading Innovation Through Strategic Exercises)

Allan Talain

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study determined the effectiveness of Project ARISE in enhancing the comprehension skills of Grade 6 learners using a true experimental research design. Specifically, pretest-posttest control group design was employed to demonstrate causality between the intervention and an outcome. The respondents involved 40 Grade 6 learners who comprised the control and experimental groups formed through simple random sampling. In connection, the reading performance of the respondents in both groups was assessed using the standardized passages from Phil-IRI at two points of the experimental study: one was before the treatment (pre-test), and the other was after the treatment (posttest). Weighted Mean was used for the analysis and interpretation of the collected data. In relation to this, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was used to determine whether the data was normal. The outcomes offer strong proof that the data are regularly delivered. Thus, the data were statistically treated using the independent t-test, a parametric test. Lavene's test for equality of variance was utilized to examine the differences in pre-test scores between the experimental and control groups. Meanwhile, the results suggest no difference between the variances of both groups, which means there is homogeneity before employing Project ARISE in the treatment group and the teacher-led reading approach in the control group. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between the pre-test scores of control and experimental groups in terms of comprehension, which indicated that there was homogeneity before utilizing Project ARISE. On the other hand, after the treatment, there was a significant difference between the posttest scores of the two groups. Therefore, there was a marked improvement in the reading performance of the respondents. This demonstrated that the respondents’ comprehension skills have improved.



References:

  1. Annamma, S., Eppolito, A., Klinger, J., Boele, A., Boardman, A., & Stillman- Spisak, S.J. (2011). Collaborative strategic reading. Fostering for All Voices From the Middle, 19(2), 27-32. https://www.nete.org/journals/vm/print-to-practice.
  2. Baclig, E. C. (2020, November 20). Philippines drops further in global English proficiency rankings. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1362951/philippines-drops-further-in-global-english-proficiency-rankings
  3. Barrot, J. (2016). Key concept in teaching macro skills. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061071  
  4. Caper. C. (2015). The importance of reading in improving performance level. The Modern Teacher, 64(1), 126. 
  5. Clarke, P. J., Truelove, E., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2013). Developing reading comprehension. Wiley- Blackwell. 
  6. Claessen, M., Dzidic, P., Boyes, M., Badcock, N., Nayton, M., & Leitao, S. (2020). Educators’ perceptions of the impact of reading difficulties for young people. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 25, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2020.1734952  
  7. Cleveland, B. (2017). The school library as a behaviour setting: Exploring the physical and social components behind effective learning environment. http://www.academia.edu/4612918.  
  8. Custodio, L. P. 2016). Reading comprehension: Path to a better understanding. The Modern Teacher, 64(1), 203. 
  9. Gelzheiser, L. M., Scanlon, D. M., Flynn, L. H., & Connors, P. (2019). Comprehensive reading intervention in Grades 3-8. The Guilford Press. 
  10. Manaog, N. S. (Jan. 23, 2020). Why students have poor reading comprehension. https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/01/23/students-Campus-press/why-have-poor-reading-comprehension
  11. Nambiar, Z. Z., & Tengku, N.R. (2014).  Effects of metadiscourse in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners.  The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(3), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.17576131-2014-2003-03.  
  12. Ruiz, Y. (2015). Improving reading comprehension through the use of interactive strategies: A quantitative study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix, 2015). https://www.proquest.com.
  13. Tadesse, T. (2018). Assessing the dimensionality and educational impacts of integrated ICT literacy in the higher education context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/2957.  
  14. Talain, A., A. (2021). Project Educational Video-Assisted Reciprocal and Strategic Reading (Eares): An intervention program to address difficulties in word recognition and comprehension among Grade 6 pupils. IOER Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj257
  15. Toste, J., & Ciullo, S. (2017). Reading and writing instruction in the upper elementary grades. Intervention in School and Clinic Journal, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216676835.  
  16. Tromp, B. (2012). Making content comprehensive for English Language learners. Pearson Education. 
  17. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S., & Stillman- Spisak, S.J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938-964. https://www.aer.sagepub.com.