HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 11 no. 1 (2015)

Sustainable tourism in an ecologically critical area: Implications to Dahican and its threatened marine megafauna

Lea A. Jimenez | Bernadette J. Nanual | Diana Maria Margarita Verdote | Maria Jessica June Labaja | Marlo Khen D. Inabiogan | France Guillian B Rapiz

Discipline: Environmental Science

 

Abstract:

The City of Mati, Davao Oriental is one of the few places that can boast of a wide variety of natural attractions ideal for promoting eco-tourism enterprises. Dahican Beach is unique because it is the habitat of several charismatic marine megafauna, namely: dugongs, whale sharks, dolphins, and three species of nesting marine turtles. Yet, very little is about the marine species that have made Dahican their home. In 2013, the Regional ICRM Center XI simultaneously conducted two studies in Dahican: one was the baseline study on the status of marine megafauna in Mayo Bay, and the other was a willingness-to-pay study for the feasibility of collecting environmental fees. Both projects have implications on the sustainability of these resources as well as that of future tourism endeavors. Around the same time, however, the operation of a personal watercraft (PWC) - popularly known as Jet Ski® had been observed in Dahican. Such an activity has and will result to a number of issues including but not limited to conflict with other beach recreationists, disruption in the conduct of RIC Xl’s research, and the potentially grave threat to the survival of marine organisms, especially the large marine vertebrates. To elucidate to the reader the possible threats of PWCs on the marine wildlife of Dahican, a literature review is provided.



References:

  1. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Trade Organization (WTO).  Making  Tourism  More  Sustainable:  A  Guide  for  Policy  Makers. France and Spain: United Nations Environment Programme and World Trade Organization; 2005. p 222.
  2. World Bank. Sustainable Tourism and Cultural Heritage: A Review of Development Assistance md its Potential to Promote Sustainability. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1999. p 67.
  3. Neto, F. A New Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development: Moving Beyond Environmental Protection. DESA Discussion Paper No. 29. Discussion Paper of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations; 2003. p 16.
  4. D’Antuono K. The National Park Services’ Proposed Ban: A New Approach to Personal Watercrafts Use in the National Parks. 27 B.C. Envtl. L. Rev [Online]. 2000; 243: (2):243-278.
  5. Davenport J, Davenport JL. The impact of tourism and personal leisure transport on coastal environments: A review. Estuar Coast Shelf S [Online]. 2006; 67:280-292.
  6. Marsh H, Penrose H, Eros C, Hughes J. Dugong Status Report and Action Plans for Countries and Territories. UK: United Nations Environment Progamme World Conservation Monitoring Centre; 2002. p 162.
  7. Taubitz, E. 2007. Potential effect of whale watching engine noise on the vocal behavior  of  bottlenose dolphins  (Tursiops  truncatus)  in  Bocas  del  Toro, Panama and Manzanillo, Costa Rica. Diploma Thesis, Universitat Rostock, Rostock, Germany, 2007, p 69.
  8. Roussel  E. Disturbance  to  Mediterranean cetaceans caused by noise.  In: G. Notarbartolo di Sciara (Ed.), Cetaceans of the Mediterranean and Black Seas: state of knowledge and conservation strategies. A report to the ACCOBAMS Secretariat, Monaco, February 2002. Section 13, p 18.
  9. Koschinski S. 2008. Possible Impact of Personal (PWC) on Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) and Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina). Literature study commissioned by the Society for the Conservation of Marine Mammals (Gesellschaft zum Schutz der Meeressäugetiere e. V., GSM), Quickborn, Germany; 2008. p 13.
  10. Martinez E, Stockin KA. Blunt Trauma Observed in a Common Dolphin Delphinus sp. Likely Caused by a Vessel Collision in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Pac Conservat Biol [Online]. 2013; 19 (1): 19-27.
  11. Rowat D, Brooks KS. A review of the biology, fisheries and conservation of the whale Rhincodon typus. J Fish Biol [Online]. 2012; 80: 1019-1056.
  12. A1ava MNR, Dolumbal’o ERZ, Yaptinchay AA, Trono RB. 1997. Fishery and trade of whale sharks and manta rays in the Bohol Sea, Philippines. In Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management (Fowler, S. L., Reed, T. M. & Dipper, F. A., eds.). Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia; 2015, p. 132-148.
  13. Quiros AL. Tourist compliance to a code of conduct and the resulting effects on whale shark (Rhincodon typus) behavior in Donsol, Philippines. Fish Res [Online]. 2007; 84: 102-108.
  14. Catlin J, Jones R. Whale shark tourism at Ningaloo Marine Park: A longitudinal study of wildlife tourism. Tourism Manage [Online]. 2010; 31:386-394.
  15. Pine R. 2007. Donsol Whale Shark Tourism Coastal Resource Management: A Case Study on the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: WWF-Phi1ippines•, 2007. p 41.
  16. Quiros AL. Whale shark “ecotourism” in the Philippines and Belize: evaluating conservation and community benefits. Tropical Resources Bulletin [Online]. 2005. 24:42-48
  17. Pierce  SJ,  Mendez-Jimenez  A,  Rosero-Caicedo  M,  Monadjem  A.  Developing a code of conduct for whale shark interactions in Mozambique. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst [Online]. 2010; 20 (7): p 8.
  18. Mau R. Managing for conservation and recreation: The Ningaloo whale shark experience. Journal of Ecotourism [Online]. 2008; 7:213-225
  19. Scarpaci C, Parsons ECM, Luck M. 2008. Recent advances in whale watching research:  2006-2007.  Tourism  in  Marine  Environments  [Online].  2008; 5(1):55-66.
  20. California Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA). Fact Sheet e New Regulations for Gasoline Marine Engines. http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/offroad/recmarine/documents/facts.pdf (Accessed February 2, 2013)
  21. Ziegler J, Dearden P, Rollin R. But are tourists satisfied? Importance-performance analysis of the whale shark tourism industry on Isla Holbox, Mexico. Tourism Manage [Online]. 2011; 30: 1-10.
  22. Bagarinao TU. 2011. The Sea Turtles Capture by Coastal Fisheries in the Northeastern Sulu Sea, Philippines: Documentation, Care and Release. Herpetol Conserv Bio [Online]. 2011; 6 (3): 353-363.
  23. Plotkin PT (ed.). National Marine Fisheries Service and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Status Reviews for Sea Turtles Listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Silver Spring, Maryland: National Marine Fisheries Service;1995. p 139.
  24. Choi GY, Ecken KL. Manual of Best Practices for Safeguarding Sea Turtle Nesting Beaches. Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Technical Report No. 9. Ballwin, Missouri: WIDECAST; 2009. p 86.