HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 9 no. 1 (2013)

Impact of ICRMP on the Socio-economic Status and Participation of Fishing Households in Mati, Davao Oriental

Enrique G. Oracion | Dave E. Marcial | Jessie V Alzate | Roland Dalagan

Discipline: Economics

 

Abstract:

Employing quota sampling technique, 240 fishing households were interviewed in six sites along Mayo Bay (Dahican), Pujada Bay (Tamisan, Lawigan), and Balete Bay (Dawan, Mamali, Macambol) all in the City of Mati, Davao Oriental. These areas have established, or yet to be delineated as Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Poverty incidence among households in all sites was high since their income fell below Php 7,000.00 per month. More men (64%) were engaged in agricultural enterprise than women. They had low (15.42%) participation in organizations which were engaged in coastal resources management. They participated in decision-making processes that were relevant to coastal resource management but majority (59.96%) had less influence especially in policy making. Social facilities and services the households availed of included pre-school, elementary and high schools. Only few (10%) had collegiate education. Health centers were present in almost (92.92%) all sites. Safe sources of water were available in the form of communal faucets and public deep wells. Few (38.75%) availed of productive loans and financial assistance (25.42%) respectively. The distance of the respondents’ house from ICRMP interventions and enforcement landmarks were not significantly related to household income. Only household income and distance of fishing from MPA was significantly related. This means that those who fished near the MPAs were catching more due to “spill over” effects (i.e., mature fish get out of the MPA and caught later by fishers). Thus, it was the direct utilization of fishery and marine resources that posed impact rather than the distance of their domicile.



References:

  1. Alcala, A.C. 2011. A National Integrated Coastal Resources Management and Marine Biodiversity Research Agenda for the Philippines, DENR-Protected Wildlife Bureau, Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Center, Quezon Avenue, Diliman 1101 Quezon City Philippines. 3-5 p.
  2. Alcala, A.C. and calumpong. HIP. 2008 Siliman University Marine Protected Area (MPA) Program, 1974 to 2006. In: Miclat RI. Gonzales ROM and Alina PM (Editors). Coastä  Zones  Philippines2  Sustainable  Financing  and  Marine  Protected  Areas
  3. Congress. MSN. ME&R Foundation, Inc., and Marine Science Institute. up Diliman, QC. Philippines. 71 p.
  4. Aswani, S., & Weiant, P. (2004). Scientific evaluation in women’s participatory management: monitoring marine invertebrate refugia in the Solomon Islands. Human organization, 63(3), 301-319.
  5. European Marine protected Areas tools for fisheries Management & Conservation (EMPAFISH) 2006. Economic Analysis of Marine protected Areas: A Literature Review h«p./tvxw.urn.empafish. Auster M. eta (Ed.). 51 pp.
  6. Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2009). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. World Bank Publications.
  7. Lutchman, I., & Aalbersberg, W. (2005). Marine protected areas: benefits and costs for islands. WWF the Netherlands.
  8. Pomeroy, R. (2010, November). People Matter: Social Impacts of Marine Protected Areas. In MPA Advisory Committee Meeting, Sta. Barbara CA http://www.mpa. gov/ pdf/fac/10mtg_nov02_04/people_matter_bob_pomeroypdf.
  9. Vicente, J. A., & Cerezo, R. B. (2010). The Socio-Economic Contributions of Marine Protected Areas to the Fisherfolk of Lingayen Gulf, Northwestern Philippines.