Impact of ICRMP on the Socio-economic Status and Participation of Fishing Households in Mati, Davao Oriental
Enrique G. Oracion | Dave E. Marcial | Jessie V Alzate | Roland Dalagan
Discipline: Economics
Abstract:
Employing quota sampling technique, 240 fishing households were
interviewed in six sites along Mayo Bay (Dahican), Pujada Bay (Tamisan, Lawigan),
and Balete Bay (Dawan, Mamali, Macambol) all in the City of Mati, Davao Oriental.
These areas have established, or yet to be delineated as Marine Protected Areas
(MPAs). Poverty incidence among households in all sites was high since their income
fell below Php 7,000.00 per month. More men (64%) were engaged in agricultural
enterprise than women. They had low (15.42%) participation in organizations which
were engaged in coastal resources management. They participated in decision-making
processes that were relevant to coastal resource management but majority (59.96%) had
less influence especially in policy making. Social facilities and services the households
availed of included pre-school, elementary and high schools. Only few (10%) had
collegiate education. Health centers were present in almost (92.92%) all sites. Safe
sources of water were available in the form of communal faucets and public deep
wells. Few (38.75%) availed of productive loans and financial assistance (25.42%)
respectively. The distance of the respondents’ house from ICRMP interventions and
enforcement landmarks were not significantly related to household income. Only
household income and distance of fishing from MPA was significantly related. This
means that those who fished near the MPAs were catching more due to “spill over”
effects (i.e., mature fish get out of the MPA and caught later by fishers). Thus, it was
the direct utilization of fishery and marine resources that posed impact rather than the
distance of their domicile.
References:
- Alcala, A.C. 2011. A National Integrated Coastal Resources Management and Marine Biodiversity Research Agenda for the Philippines, DENR-Protected Wildlife Bureau, Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Center, Quezon Avenue, Diliman 1101 Quezon City Philippines. 3-5 p.
- Alcala, A.C. and calumpong. HIP. 2008 Siliman University Marine Protected Area (MPA) Program, 1974 to 2006. In: Miclat RI. Gonzales ROM and Alina PM (Editors). Coastä Zones Philippines2 Sustainable Financing and Marine Protected Areas
- Congress. MSN. ME&R Foundation, Inc., and Marine Science Institute. up Diliman, QC. Philippines. 71 p.
- Aswani, S., & Weiant, P. (2004). Scientific evaluation in women’s participatory management: monitoring marine invertebrate refugia in the Solomon Islands. Human organization, 63(3), 301-319.
- European Marine protected Areas tools for fisheries Management & Conservation (EMPAFISH) 2006. Economic Analysis of Marine protected Areas: A Literature Review h«p./tvxw.urn.empafish. Auster M. eta (Ed.). 51 pp.
- Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2009). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. World Bank Publications.
- Lutchman, I., & Aalbersberg, W. (2005). Marine protected areas: benefits and costs for islands. WWF the Netherlands.
- Pomeroy, R. (2010, November). People Matter: Social Impacts of Marine Protected Areas. In MPA Advisory Committee Meeting, Sta. Barbara CA http://www.mpa. gov/ pdf/fac/10mtg_nov02_04/people_matter_bob_pomeroypdf.
- Vicente, J. A., & Cerezo, R. B. (2010). The Socio-Economic Contributions of Marine Protected Areas to the Fisherfolk of Lingayen Gulf, Northwestern Philippines.
ISSN 2984-7125 (Online)
ISSN 2244-4432 (Print)