HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 9 no. 1 (2013)

Philippine Mining Companies’ Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility

Marshaley J. Baquiano

Discipline: physical geographical sciences



This study looked at how mining companies operating in the Philippines socially represent corporate social responsibility using the lens of social representation theory. I used thematic analysis in examining nine articles taken from the websites of nine mining companies and published within the month of March, 2009. The study found shared representations of corporate social responsibility. The narratives focused on commitment to environment, communities, and employees as well as working hand in hand with various stakeholders. The findings point to the need to explore the social understanding of other mining stakeholders to capture a more comprehensive picture of corporate social responsibility as this study looked only at the mining companies’ points of view. The results also show that social representations are located not only in people’s everyday talk but also in their crafted work and writings as found in mass communication media.


  1. Bauer, M. & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 29(2), 163-186.
  2. Caroll, A. (1999). Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38(3), 268-295.
  3. Hamann, R. & Kapelus, P. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in mining in South Africa: fair accountability or just green wash Development 47(3), 85-92.
  4. Hamann, R. (2003). Mining companies’ role in sustainable development: the why and how of corporate social responsibility from a business perspective. Development Southern Africa 20(2), 237-254.
  5. Hilson, G. (2007). Championing the rhetoric? Corporate social responsibility in Ghana mining sector. Retrieved on March 23, 2009 from http://www.greenleafpublishing.com
  6. Imbun, B. Y (2007). Cannot manage without the significant other: mining, corporate social responsibility and local communities in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Business Ethics 73, 177-192.
  7. Jenkins, H. &Obara, L. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility in the mining industry — the risk of community dependency. Retrieved on March 22, 2009 from http://crrconference.org/ downloads/2006jenkinsobara.pdf
  8. Panyarachun, K. A. (2003). Asian forum on corporate social responsibility keynote address. In F. Alfornso, B. Jikich, & P. Sharma (Eds.) Asian forum on corporate social responsibility (pp. 5-7). Makati City. Asian Institute of Management
  9. Parker, R. A. (2007, February 28). Community impacts of Corporate social responsibility in the mining sector: examples from Peru, Canada, and Mali. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  10. Pop, A. (2008, July). Exploring polemical social representations in an environmental conflict through visual image analysis. Conference conducted at 9th International Conference on Social Representation Bali, Indonesia.
  11. Jodelet, D. (2006). Représentation Sociales [Social Représentations Theory]. Le Dictionnaire des Sciences Humaines.
  12. Jones, M., Marshall, S., & Mitchell, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the management of labor in two Australian mining industry companies. Corporate Governance 15(1), 57-67.
  13. Kotler, P. & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the best for your company and your Cause. USA: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
  14. Maximiano, J. M. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Basic principles and best practices. Makati City: PLOT and Antonio C. Maximiano
  15. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117-127.
  16. Moscovici (1997). Social representations theory and social constructionism. Retrieved July 23, 2008 from http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bit/moscl-htm
  17. Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.
  18. Social responsibilities of business corporations (1971). USA: Committee for Economic Development.
  19. Spencer, L, Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Analysis: Practices, principles and processes. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.),
  20. Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (pp. 199-218). London: Sage.
  21. Wagner, W, Duveen, G., Farr, R, Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Ci01di, E, Markovå, 1., et al. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 95-125.
  22. Warhurst, A. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry. Euromines, Brussels, 4.