Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 2 no. 7 (2024)

Assessing Teachers’ Readiness for Mathematics Instruction: Insights from Student Perspectives

Nashiera J. Tahamid

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study evaluated the perceived readiness of Mathematics teachers at Luuk National High School from the perspective of their students. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational research design, the study included 100 student respondents selected through purposive sampling. Key findings are as follows: The majority of the 100 student respondents are female, within the typical age range for junior high school, and evenly distributed across the four grade levels. Their parents generally have average educational attainment and low-income levels. Students perceive their teachers as frequently prepared to teach Mathematics across three main areas: understanding of student needs in Mathematics, strategies for engaging students, and the implementation of instructional practices. No significant differences were observed in perceived teacher readiness based on students' age, gender, parental education, or family income, except grade level. There is a significant positive correlation among the subcategories of teacher readiness, except between understanding student needs in Mathematics and engagement strategies. The study offers several recommendations: School administrators should enhance support and resources for Mathematics teachers through professional development, mentoring, feedback, and recognition. Mathematics teachers are encouraged to deepen their understanding of student needs, refine their instructional strategies, and collaborate with colleagues to share best practices. Parents should actively support their children's Mathematics education, especially given the low income and educational levels within the community. Students should value and leverage the readiness and resources provided by their teachers. Future research should investigate additional factors influencing teacher readiness, such as school culture, curriculum, assessment methods, and technological integration.



References:

  1. ADESQ. (2015). Targeted competencies in graduate programs.
  2. Airy, D. (2017). Teacher readiness definition. Law Insider. Retrieved from https://www.lawinsider.com/teacher
  3. Barr, N. (2019). Instructional strategies for the classroom. Graduate Programs. Retrieved from https://www.graduateprogram.org
  4. Braun, C. (2022). Research design: What it is, elements and types. QuestionPro. Retrieved from https://www.questionpro.com/blog
  5. Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wprs3
  6. Burger, E. B., & Starbird, M. (2015). The 5 elements of effective thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400844562
  7. Byrnes, J. (2015). Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematics procedural learning.
  8. Carraso, L., Lanos, M. G., & Teodora, C. (2019). What is instructional practices? IGI Global. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/leading
  9. Cross, S. (2017). The influence of teacher readiness to learning achievement of students. SciTePress. Retrieved from https://www.scitepress.org/press
  10. Cross, S. (2020). The influence of teacher readiness to learning achievement of vocational students. SciTePress. Retrieved from https://www.scitepress.org
  11. Deal, N. (2022). What skills, knowledge, and experiences are needed to become a teacher? Chron. Retrieved from https://work.chron.com/skills-knowledge
  12. Donaghy, L. (2019). Subject knowledge: 10 things every teacher-educator should know. Teach First. Retrieved from https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/blog
  13. Dunn, E. (2017). Learner readiness: Why and how should they be ready? ERIC. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext
  14. Dunn, E. (2023). Identifying the individual differences among students. ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov
  15. Enid, C. (2016). How does a teacher demonstrate knowledge of students? Deerfield. Retrieved from https://www.deerfield.k12.us
  16. Farr, S. (2022). Teacher readiness definition. Law Insider. Retrieved from https://www.lawinsider.com/teach
  17. Fort, C. (2021). The Institute for Learning and Teaching, Colorado 80521, 801 Oval Drive.
  18. Frost, T. (2023). Teacher readiness definition. Law Insider. Retrieved from https://www.lawinsider.com/teach
  19. Gross, E. (2018). Response: Building relationships with students is the most important thing a teacher can do. EdWeek. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org
  20. Hurst, T. (2018). Improving students' relationships with teachers. EdWeek. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org
  21. Janiola, F. R. (2019). The readiness of mathematics teachers in teaching K to 12: Spiral approach. Holy Name University, Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines.
  22. Joust, P. (2022). Instructional practices. Texas Education Agency. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/system
  23. Knorr, Q. (2018). Knowledge, for, in, and of practice. Galileo. Retrieved from https://inquiry.galileo.org/knowledge
  24. Kohn, D. (2023). Descriptive research: Design, methods, examples, and FAQs. Dovetail. Retrieved from https://dovetail.com/research/design
  25. Kolbi, D. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
  26. Laal, M. (2015). Lifelong learning: Why do we need it?
  27. Lear, N. (2023). Learning profiles: What great teachers should know about their students. TeachThought. Retrieved from https://www.teachthought.com
  28. Lear, P. (2023). Characteristics of highly effective teaching and learning (CHETL). Retrieved from https://education.ky.gov/pages
  29. Magnusson, N., Krajcik, C., & Borko, P. (2015). Pedagogical content knowledge.
  30. Manasia, L., & Teodora, C. (2020). Teaching readiness model: Conceptualization of professional knowledge, professional practice, and self-management. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net
  31. Manasia, L., Lanos, M. G., & Teodora, C. (2019). Pre-service teacher preparedness for fostering education for sustainable development: An empirical analysis of central dimensions of teaching readiness. Bucharest, Romania.
  32. McGill University. (2020). Subject knowledge/Skillsets. FutureLearn. Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com
  33. Muñiz-Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., & Alsina, Á. (2020). Deficits in the statistical and probabilistic literacy of citizens: Effects in a world in crisis. Mathematics, 8(11), 1872. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8111872
  34. Penn, R. (2017). The importance of knowledge for teaching. The Education Hub. Retrieved from https://theducationhub.org
  35. Persaud, C. (2023). 25 effective instructional strategies for educators. Top Hat. Retrieved from https://tophat.com/blog/instruction
  36. Perth, M. (2022). The importance of teacher knowledge of individual students’ skills (KISS). CEPA. Retrieved from https://cepa.stanford.edu/content
  37. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2015). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other?
  38. Sánchez Prieto, J., Trujillo Torres, J. M., Gómez García, M., & Gómez García, G. (2020). Gender and digital teaching competence in dual vocational education and training. Education Sciences, 10(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030084
  39. Staake, J. (2023). 30 instructional strategies examples for every kind of classroom.
  40. Talikan, A. (2021). Effectiveness of back-to-basic mathematics on physics performance of the students in Mindanao State University-Sulu in the Southern Philippines. LC International Journal of STEM, 2(4), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6412425
  41. Talikan, A. (2024). Academic resilience in mathematics among senior high school students in Mindanao State University-Sulu. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(6), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10987904
  42. Teaching Effectiveness Framework. (2022). Knowledge of instructional practices.
  43. Tramp, R. (2022). Laws of learning no instructional designer can afford to ignore. Shift Learning. Retrieved from https://www.shiftlearning.com/bid
  44. UNESCO. (2022). Content knowledge. IIEP Policy Toolbox.
  45. Viquez, H. A. (2022). E-learning readiness of teachers in the new normal education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. Retrieved from https://ijere.iaescore.com/view

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic