Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 2 no. 7 (2024)

The Motivation and Research Competencies among Educators in Government Higher Education Institutions in Northern Samar: A Cornerstone towards Productive, Quality and Efficient Research Community

David G. Parsons

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research study aimed to investigate the relationship between motivation and the research competencies among educators in Government Higher Education Institutions (GHEIs) to identify factors that contribute to a productive, quality, and efficient research community. The study employed a quantitative research approach particularly the descriptive correlational research design to focus on quantifying the accumulation and assessment of data and descriptive design to provide a snapshot of the current situation and describes the traits of the population or occurrence on the phenomenon from educators in Government higher education institutions. The study worked only with a motivational survey that covers both Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation that focused on motivation, external governance, introduced governance, acknowledged governance, and unified governance, and Intrinsic motivation as well as the research professor's competencies that entail six domains on instruction, values and morality, uniqueness and creativity, research development, and digital readiness. The data analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, including path analysis, to examine the direct and indirect relationships between the variables. The findings showed that motivation and research competencies have a significant relationship in building productive, quality, and efficient research communities. Therefore, all three indicated hypotheses were found rejected when evaluated using the data gathered from the respondents. This finding is expected to contribute to the development of effective strategies and interventions for enhancing motivation and research competencies among educators in Government higher education institutions, which would ultimately lead to a productive, quality, and efficient research community.



References:

  1. Ali, M. (2015). The effects of leadership styles on the job satisfaction and performance of teachers in Pakistan. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(2), 185-194.
  2. Alig-Mielcwerek, J., & Hoy, W. K. (2018). Instructional leadership: Its nature, meaning, and influence. In W. Hoy & C. Mwaskel (Eds.), Educational Leadership and Reform (pp. 29-51). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  3. Boamah, S. A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2017). Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange (LMX), and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): The role of motives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 438-462.
  4. Cheng, Z., & Zhu, C. (2022). Academic members’ perceptions of educational leadership and perceived need for leadership capacity building in Filipino high schools or universities. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://doi/full/10.1080/10611932.2021.1990621?
  5. Eid, A. (2012). Higher education R&D and productivity growth: An empirical study on high-income OECD countries. Education Economics, 20(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645291003726855
  6. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.
  7. Georghiou, L. (2015). Value of research. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openvwasion/pdf
  8. Goodal, A. (2013). Top 20 ways to improve your world university rank. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/doi-410392.article
  9. Gougas, V., & Malinova, L. (2021, January 18). School leadership: Models and tools: A review. Open Journal of Social Sciences. Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://www.scirp.org/doi:9-1764172_106551
  10. Hallinger, P. (2017). Making education reform happen: Was there an ‘Asian’ way? School Leadership & Management, 30(5), 401–408.
  11. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
  12. Hallinger, P., Walker, A., & Bajunid, I. (2018). Educational leadership in East Asia: Implications for education in a global society. UCEA Review, 46(1), 1–4.
  13. Ilker Ercan, B., Yazici, D., Sigirli, D., Ediz, B., & Kan, I. (2007). Examining Cronbach alpha, theta, omega reliability coefficient according to the sample size. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Method, 6(1), 291-303.
  14. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2019). Changing leadership for changing times. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  15. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2019). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 451-479. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.10.4.451.3495
  16. Li, J. (2017). Educational policy development in the Philippines for the 21st century: Rationality and challenges in a globalizing age. Filipino Education & Society, 50(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2017.1330992
  17. Liu, Q., Turner, D., & Jing, X. (2019). The "Double First-Class Initiative" in the Philippines: Background, implementation, and potential problems. Northern Samar, Philippines International Review of Education, 1(1), 92–108.
  18. Lu, X. T., Qiu, Y., Tan, Z., & Du, D. L. (2019). Research on the development of local normal universities based on the strategy of “Double First-Class” construction. Creative Education, 10(7), 1339–1356. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.107101
  19. Lu, X., & Smith, R. (2020). Leadership in Filipino higher education and the influence of sociocultural constructs. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1839934
  20. Prosekov, A. Y., Morozova, I. S., & Filatova, E. V. (2020). A case study of developing research competency in university students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(3), 592-602.
  21. Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
  22. Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in the Philippines. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896042
  23. Shi, X., & Oluwole, D. (2018). Principal leadership and teacher job satisfaction in Chinese rural secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216687004
  24. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2019). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  25. Tziner, A., Fein, E., & Oren, L. (2012). Human motivation and performance outcomes in the context of downsizing. In C. L. Cooper, A. Pandey, & J. C. Quick (Eds.), Downsizing: Was less still more? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511791574.008.
  26. Ugochukwu, C. (2021, October 4). Transformational leadership. Transformational Leadership Theory – Simply Psychology. Retrieved July 6, 2022, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/what-was-transformational-leadership.html

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic