HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 8 (2024)

Towards An Integrated Structure and Agency Construction of Political Rights in the Philippines

Milrose Patawaran-Llenas | Emmanuel D. Batoon

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

Political rights in the Philippines continue to be a persistent societal challenge despite ongoing efforts across various sectors to address issues related to their protection. Human rights studies traditionally consider political rights inherent, yet disputes over their interpretation persist, suggesting that consensus depends on aligning definitions with universal human nature. This paper contends that political rights are socially constructed through historical processes involving diverse social structures and agents. Therefore, integrating structural and agential perspectives is crucial for establishing a common societal understanding of these rights. Drawing on social constructionism theories by Benjamin Gregg (2011), Peter Berger (1966), and Anthony Giddens' structuration theory (1984), this study explores how individuals' interactions within society and culture shape the conception of political human rights. An exploratory-sequential mixed-method approach was employed, combining qualitative documentary analysis and interviews to investigate how social structures and agents construct political rights. Quantitative data triangulation further enhanced the study's comprehensiveness and depth. Key findings underscore ongoing efforts to address political rights in the Philippines, highlighting the social nature of their understanding and the necessity for collaborative efforts among government and multiple sectors.



References:

  1. Ahmed, J. (2010). Documentary Research Method: New Dimensions. Indus Journal of Management & Social Science (IJMSS), 4, 1-14.
  2. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
  3. Chatterjee, I., Kunwar, J., & Den Hond, F. (2019). Anthony Giddens and structuration theory. In S. Clegg, & M. Pina e Cunha (Eds.), Management, Organizations and Contemporary Social Theory (pp. 60-79). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279591-4
  4. Frohlich, K. L., & Potvin, L. (2010). Commentary: Structure or agency? The importance of both for addressing social inequalities in health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(2), 378-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp372
  5. Gregg, B. (2012). Human Rights as Social Construction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059626
  6. Human Rights Principles and Rights. (n.d.). Asia Pacific Human Rights Information Center Hurights Osaka, 15-32. https://www.hurights.or.jp/archives/other_publications/section1/pdf/Principles%2C%20Rights%2C%20Duty%20and%20Pedagogy.pdf
  7. Kipo-Sunyehzi, D. (2014). Agency-Structure Relation in Social Sciences: Reflections on Policy Implementation. Asian Social Science, 10(2), 19-26. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n2p18
  8. Mintz, M. (2006). Crime and Punishment in Pre-Hispanic Philippine Society. Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context, (13). http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue13/mintz.html (22.10.2010)
  9. Meta Response: Philippines Human Rights Impact Assessment. (2021, December). https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Meta-Response_Philippines-Human-Rights-Impact-Assessment
  10. Mihr, A. (2012). Towards a Human Rights Pedagogy. Council of Europe Janusz Korczak Seminar on Education for Democracy, European Youth Centre, Strasbourg. https://rm.coe.int/16802f9acd
  11. PhilRights. (2013). From four nodes of history: The human rights challenge in the Philippine security sector. Philippine Human Rights Information Center, 1-104.
  12. Vinney, C., Dill-Shackleford, K. E., Plante, C. N., & Bartsch, A. (2019). Development and validation of a measure of popular media fan identity and its relationship to well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000188