Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 7 (2024)

Mathematics E-learning Packets for Technical and Livelihood Education (TLE) Automotive Servicing

Jonathan C. Tuazon

Discipline: education and teaching

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to develop and evaluate Mathematics e-learning packets tailored for Technical and Livelihood Education (TLE) Automotive Servicing students at a public national high school, in the City Schools Division of Marikina for the School Year 2023-2024. The impetus for the study was based on the increasing number of learners who are having difficulty solving basic mathematical problems. The research addressed the following questions: (1) identifying Mathematics 9 topics suitable for e-learning packets based on literature review, (2) evaluating the developed packets by automotive and mathematics teachers according to DepEd guidelines concerning content quality, instructional quality, technical quality, assessment, visuals, and plan layout, (3) assessing any significant differences between the evaluations of the two groups of respondents, and (4) gathering comments and suggestions for improvement. Utilizing a descriptive research method, the study involved evaluations from 15 mathematics teachers and 15 automotive teachers from two public national high schools in Marikina City, Philippines. Data were analyzed using Weighted Mean and the Mann-Whitney U Test. Key findings include (1) prioritized topics under the Matatag Curriculum: perpendicular and parallel lines, relations and functions, quadratic functions and equations, direct and inverse variations, trigonometric ratios, and probability of simple events; (2) both groups rated the e-learning packets highly acceptable, with grand weighted means of 3.50 and 3.60, respectively; (3) no significant difference was found between the evaluations of the two groups; (4) respondents praised the packets' adequacy, organization, relevance, and interactivity, offering suggestions to incorporate more visuals, expand topics and activities, add video demonstrations, and involve industry professionals. In conclusion, the developed e-learning packets were well-received and deemed effective, with recommended enhancements aimed at further enriching the learning experience and bridging theoretical knowledge with practical application.



References:

  1. Abuzahra, A.S. (2018) Development and Effec-tiveness of E-Learning Modules in Auto-motive Technology
  2. Ahmed, H., & Mcguire, P. (2015). 21st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Re-search and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083656.pdf
  3. Alexey Ryzhov, Ziskin, K. E., Polina Razumovskaya, & Peshcherov, D. V. (2021). The content of the concept “quali-ty of education” and the definition of methods to measure it. ResearchGate; EDP Sciences. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349918820_The_content_of_the_concept_quality_of_education_and_the_definition_of_methods_to_measure_it
  4. Ansari, A., Hofkens, T. L., & Pianta, R. C. (2020). Teacher-student relationships across the first seven years of education and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Ap-plied Developmental Psychology, 71, 101200–101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101200
  5. Arifin, U. (2020), Transfer of ICT-Based Realis-tic Mathematics Science and Technology Worksheets to SDIT Teachers in Order to Improve Mathematical Skills in Geomet-ric Concepts. Retrieve: 2020 form ( https://www.mendeley.com/search/?page=1&query=Transfer%20Iptek%20Mathemat-ic%20Realistic%20Worksheet%20Berbasis%20ICT%20Kepada%20GuruGuru%20SDIT%20dalam%20Rangka%20Meningkat-kan%20Keterampilan%20Matematis%20pada%20Konsep%20Geometris&sortBy=relevance)
  6. Aronuevo, Heydee I. (2019). Interactive Sup-plementary Intervention Materials in Chemistry 8. A Master’s Thesis. Marikina Polytechnic College. Sta Elena, Marikina City
  7. Benjamin Kobina Sarbah. (2020, June 21). CONSTRUCTIVISM LEARNING AP-PROACHES. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344015500_CONSTRUCTIVISM_LEARNING_APPROACHES#:~:text=The%20constructiv-ism%20is%20an%20important,nature%20of%20reality.%20...
  8. Carreon, J. R., Aquino, J. T., & Salera, J. C. (n.d.). Validation and utilization of a developed contextualized learning module. Re-trieved May 10, 2022, from https://www.google.com
  9. Castor, K. J. (2019). Computer-Based Instruc-tional Materials in Statistics and Probabil-ity for Grade 11. A Master’s Thesis. Marikina Polytechnic College. Marikina City.
  10. Clavido, G. B., & Denmark Simbajon Macal-isang. (2024, February). Teaching Styles and Pupils’ Learning Styles: Their Rela-tionship with Pupils’ Academic Perfor-mance. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377953664_Teaching_Styles_and_Pupils'_Learning_Styles_Their_Relationship_with_Pupils'_Academic_Performance
  11. Cos, F. L., Duero, M. C., & Ranillo, M. (2021). The Viability of Deped Textbooks as the Primary Material for the Modular Dis-tance Learning Modality of Carrascal Na-tional High School. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 1(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.12691/jitl-1-2-2
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2021). Concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Baez, V. (2021). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Re-search design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE.
  15. Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual Methods in Teach-ing. Retrieved from http://books.google.ie/books?id=yNyGNAEACAAJ&dq=Dale,+E.91969).+Audio-Visu-al+Method+in+Teaching,+3rd+ed.+Holt,Rine-hart,+New+York&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
  16. Detlef Urhahne, & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Re-view, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
  17. Dowker, A. (2005). Individual Differences in Arithmetic. Psychology Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.ie/books?id=6DBRYsN-aOIC&pg=PT4&dq=Dowke+r,+A.+(2005b).+Individual+Difference+in+Arithmetic:+Implica-tions+for+psychology,+Neuroscience,+and+Education.+How+and+New+York:+Psycholo-gy+Press.&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
  18. Escalera, Promise Joy S. (2019). Supplemen-tary Learning Materials in Physics
  19. Fletcher, J. M., & Miciak, J. (2019). The Identi-fication of Specific Learning Disabilities: A Summary of Research on Best Practic-es. Austin, TX: Meadows Center for Pre-venting Educational Risk.
  20. Galos, R. (2022). Science Learning Activity Packets (SciLAPs) on the Evaluation of Learning Performance. International Journal of Research Publication and Re-views Journal Homepage: Www.ijrpr.com ISSN, 3(7), 1800–1810. https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V3ISSUE7/IJRPR5888.pdf
  21. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabili-ties, 37(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370010201
  22. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early Identification and Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040301
  23. Giri, A. K., Pandey, R., & Mohapatra, G. (2021). Does Technological Progress, Trade, or Financial Globalization Stimulate Income Inequality in India, Journal of Asian Fi-nance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0111
  24. Gökçe, S., & Guner, P. (2021). Forty Years of Mathematics Education: 1980-2019. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technolo-gy, 9(3), 514–539. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1361
  25. Grainger, P. R., Christie, M., & Carey, M. (2019). Assessing written communication skills using a Continua Model of a Guide to Making Judgments (GTMJ). Research Online. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol16/iss2/10/
  26. Khasanah, A. (2021), The Effect of Quizizz and Learning Independence on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. Retrieved on June 29, 2021 from Tradis: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah (http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadris/article/view/7288/pdf?fbclid=IwAR0payS-MlbtIKhVgM1hqz-tSd00y6VhqEw-OT2_09RWvFAlYN312Ktt0M)
  27. Kwabena, G. Y., Mei, Q., Ghumro, T. H., Li, W., & Erusalkina, D. (2021). Effects of a Technological-Organizational Environ-mental Factor on the Adoption of the Mobile Payment System. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 329338. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0329.
  28. Lister, C. (2020). Constructivism: The Founda-tion of Inquiry Learning. Unlearn to Learn. Retrieved 20 June 2020, from https://christopherlister.ca/tiegrad-2/constructivism-the-foundation-of-inquiry-learning/.
  29. Miller, C., Cruz, L., & Kelley, J. (2021). Outside the Box. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 76–93.
  30. Mohamad, M. M. (2013). Learning styles and academic achievement among building construction students. A Dissertation. Skudai, Malaysia:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  31. Mohamad, O., et al. (2014) The Impact of Web-Based Learning Materials on Technical and Vocational Skills Development
  32. Navalta, C. (2021). Deepening of Learners’ Knowledge and Learning Experiences Through Contextualization and Localiza-tion Theory. Retrieved at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3939375 on 9, October 2021.
  33. Navalta, J. (2020) Utilization of ICT-Based In-structional Materials in Mathematics 9. A Master’s Thesis. Marikina Polytechnic College, Marikina City.
  34. Patel, V.S. (2002). An Investigation into the Proficiency in the Subject of Mathemat-ics of the Primary School Teachers. Ph.D.(Edu.), Sardar Patel University. In NCERT (Ed.2006) Sixth Survey of Re-search in Education. New Delhi: NCERT.
  35. PISA 2022 Results Learning During -and From -Disruption Publication Volume II. (n.d.). https://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/a97db61cen.pdf?expires=1702192880&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=9E9329C9BFCBC16EB340563EF1A5B59B
  36. Sage, K., Piazzini, M., Downey, J. C., & Masilela, L. (2020). Reading from Print, Laptop Computer, and E-Reader: Differences and Similarities for College Students’ Learn-ing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 441–460. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=views+and+preferences+about+print+and+digital+resources&id=EJ1268645
  37. Schubring, G. (2019, March 8). From the Few to the Many: on the emergence of math-ematics for all. Retrieved from https://revue-rdm.com/2015/from-the-few-to-the-many-on-the/
  38. Sharda, U. (2004). Using Fictional Sources in the Classroom: Applications from Cogni-tive Psychology. Review Article. Educa-tional Psychology DOI10.1007/s10648-012-9204-0
  39. Simanjuntak, Marudut & Suseno, Muchlas & Setiadi, Samsi & Lustyantie, Ninuk & Ba-rus, Irma. (2022). Integration of Curricula (Curriculum 2013 and Cambridge Curric-ulum for Junior High School Level in Three Subjects) in Pandemic Situation. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Bu-daya. 8. 77. 10.32884/ideas.v8i1.615.
  40. Şimşek, M., & Yazici, N. (2021). Examining the Digital Learning Material Preparation Competencies of Pre-Service Mathemat-ics Teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.68.8.3
  41. Tanod-Tanod, Liberty E. (2019). Supplemen-tary Instructional Modules for Spiral Progression Approach in Teaching Earth and Space with Graphic Organizers for an Enhanced Performance of Grade 8 Stu-dents. A Master’s Thesis. Marikina Poly-technic College. Sta Elena, Marikina City
  42. Tenney, K., Brinley Poulsen Stringer, LaTona-Tequida, T., & White, I. (2023). Conceptu-alizations and Limitations of STEM Liter-acy across Learning Theories. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00168-22
  43. Ukut, I. I. T., & Krairit, D. (2019). Justifying students' performance. Interactive Tech-nology and Smart Education, 16(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2018-0028
  44. View of Learning Activity Packets (LAPs) for Personal Development in Senior High School in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. (2023). Journalsajsse.com. https://journalsajsse.com/index.php/SAJSSE/article/view/669/1332
  45. Villar, R.L., & Dimarucudan, M.J.C. (2021) Inte-grating E-learning with Activity-Based Learning for Enhanced Technical Skills Development in Automotive Technology
  46. What Teachers Need to Know about Learning Difficulties. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/What_Teachers_Need_to_Know_about_Learnin.html?id=RBB1gx_8h1sC&redir_esc=y.
  47. Wheelahan, L. (2010). The quality of teaching in VET: literature review. LH Martin Insti-tute for Higher Education Leadership and Management. Melbourne Graduate School of Education. University of Mel-bourne. Available from http://www.Lhmart-in-institute.edu.au/research-andpublications/research/1-study-on-the-quality-of-teaching-in-vet

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic