HomeThe PCMC Journalvol. 19 no. 1 (2023)

Determination of the ideal timing of delivery among growth- restricted fetuses at less than 32 weeks age of gestation using a stage-based doppler protocol for admitted patients at the Philippine Children’s Medical Center

Ma. Theresa A. Muldong | Maria Estrella Y. Flores

Discipline: medicine by specialism

 

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Early onset fetal growth restriction substantially contributes to neonatal morbidities and mortalities. The main dilemma lies on the timing of delivery, especially for pre- and peri-viable fetuses, due to the challenge in creating an ideal balance of minimized in-utero hypoxia-induced fetal injury or death versus the risks of iatrogenic preterm delivery. We wished to determine the ideal timing of delivery among growth-restricted fetuses <32 weeks gestation using a stage-based doppler protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective-cohort study of 67 singleton-pregnant women with growth restriction at <32 weeks gestation and hospitalized from January 2010 to September 2021 was conducted. Medical records were reviewed, and the outcomes were extracted. The primary outcomes were arterial pH at birth and mortality, while secondary outcomes included neonatal morbidities. RESULTS: Fetal growth restriction progressed by an average of 3 stages (41.79%) within a 2- to 3.5-week period. More than half had arterial pH <7.20, which was lowest at Stage II FGR (50.00%). The prevalence of neonatal mortality was 16.42% and was lowest at Stage I (8.70%) and Stage II FGR (18.75%). CONCLUSION: Doppler studies may be conducted weekly for Stage I, biweekly for Stage II, every 1-2 days for Stage III and every 12 hours for Stage IV. Delivery



References:

  1. Albu AR, Anca AF, Horhoianu VV, Horhoianu IA. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction. J Med Life. 2014 Jun 15;7(2):165-71. Epub 2014 Jun 25. PMID: 25408721; PMCID: PMC4197512
  2. Philippine Obstetrical and Gynecological Society. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fetal Growth Disorders and Abnormalities in Amniotic Fluid Volume. November 2015
  3. Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) 2021 Annual Report: Vital statistics (published January 27, 2021)
  4. Philippine Children’s Medical Center Perinatology Section 2010-2020 Registry
  5. Spinillo, A., Gardella, B., Bariselli, S., Alfei, A., Silini, E. and Dal Bello, B. (2012), Placental histopathological correlates of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn, 32: 1263-1272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.3988
  6. Baschat AA. Arterial and venous Doppler in the diagnosis and management of early onset fetal growth restriction. Early Hum Dev. 2005 Nov;81(11):877-87. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.09.008. Epub 2005 Nov 8. PMID: 16280208.
  7. Baschat,et al.  Chapter 33 - Intrauterine Growth Restriction, Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies (Seventh Edition),Elsevier, 2017, Pages 737-769.e1, ISBN 9780323321082
  8. Figueras F, Gratacós E: Update on the Diagnosis and Classification of Fetal Growth Restriction and Proposal of a Stage-Based Management Protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;36:86-98. doi: 10.1159/000357592
  9. Daniel, W.W. and Cross, C.L. (2013) Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. 10th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
  10. Galan HL. Timing delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Semin Perinatol, 2011; 35(5): 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.009
  11. GRIT Study Group. A randomized trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003;110:27–32