Home⇛Journal of Education, Management, and Development Studies⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2023)

Semantic Analysis on the Police Lingo in the Narratives of Students of Bachelor of Science in Law Enforcement Administration: A Forensic Linguistic Study

Susan B. Pineda | Annie M. Ruiz | Vergel L. Mayo

Discipline: creative writing

 

Abstract:

This study looks into the terminologies (police lingo) in the write-ups of Bachelor of Science in Law Enforcement Administration fourth-year students to illustrate the categorical and descriptive meanings of the words used in the narratives, identify the errors in the usage, and find out inaccuracies in the application of mechanics of writing like correct spelling, capitalization, abbreviation, and punctuation marks. Twenty-six (26) (BSLEAD) students participated in this study. They were instructed to write a narrative report in one of their experiences in the field. Police lingo identified in the statements such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives, were singled out from the narratives. These words were analyzed to determine whether they clearly stated their intention and described vividly what they meant to say. Semantic analysis was done by giving the dictionary definition of the word in the first level (categorical meaning as to parts of speech) and the illustrative meaning of the word in the second analysis (descriptive meaning), hence, the police lingo in the narratives were explained and described as to their literal meanings and clarity of intention as used in the statements. Results showed that male and female respondents have a similar choice of police lingo in writing the context of utterances in the narrative reports. They also committed errors in writing mechanics such as punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. It is recommended that the BSLEAD students engage in language learning activities like conversation using English, reading forensic texts, and listening/watching investigative programs on the radio or television that use English as a medium.



References:

  1. Aher, M. (2016). The semantics of discourse as evidence. Paper presented at Forensic Linguistics: Tartu University, Estonia.
  2. Ang, E. (2016). The narrative of the police: Language features, organizational structures, and communicative functions of Philippine police report. Paper presented at the Asian Regional Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguistics, University of Santo Tomas.
  3. Chomsky, N. (1965). Persistent topics in linguistic theory. Diogenes, 13(51), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305102
  4. Cotton, K. (2003). Research you can use to improve results. Update of Section 3. Program Report.
  5. Crabbe, D. (2003). The quality of language learning opportunities. TESOL Quarterly, 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588464
  6. Faraldo-Cabana, P. (2018). Research excellence and Anglophone dominance: The case of law, criminology, and social science. In The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South (pp. 163–181). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_9
  7. Friginal, E. (2018). Corpus linguistics for English teachers: New tools, online resources, and classroom activities. Routledge.
  8. Genelza, G. (2022, June). Language learning opportunities and English language competence of first-year BS-Criminology students under the new normal setting.
  9. Gibbons, J. (2003). Law on language and linguistic evidence, in forensic linguistics. Blackwell Publishing.
  10. Hudson, J. (2004). Introduction: Aid and development. The Economic Journal, 114(496), F185–F190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3590059
  11. Hulit, L. M., Howard, M. R., & Fahey, K. R. (2011). Born to talk: An introduction to speech and language development. Pearson.
  12. Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A coursebook (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  13. Jackson, H. (1988). Words and their meaning. Longman.
  14. Mackevic, V. (2016). Identifying an anonymous author’s native language. Forensic Linguistics: Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  15. McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Topics in the design of materials and methods. In Materials and methods in ELT (pp. 1–79).
  16. Mercullo, H. M. (2020). The language of police arrest in the Philippines. Journal of Forensic Research, 11(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.37421/2157-7145.11.464
  17. Olsson, J. (2008). What is forensic linguistics? New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  18. Paligat, E. P. (2016). A handbook for criminology and public safety students (First edition). Kadena Press Foundation, Incorporated.
  19. Pidlaski, V., & Tenenbaum, A. (Eds.). (2015). Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Arcler Press LLC.
  20. Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics in linguistics. In Semantics (4th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
  21. Spolsky, B., & Hult, F. M. (Eds.). (2010). The handbook of educational linguistics (Pbk. ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
  22. Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (2001). An introduction to syntax (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164320
  23. Walsh, D., Oxburgh, G. E., & Redlich, A. D. (2016). International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation volume 2, suspects. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic